You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   253-277   278-302   303-327   328-352   353-377   378-402   403-427 
 428-452   453-457         
 
Author Message
25 new of 457 responses total.
richard
response 278 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 01:33 UTC 2005

I have noticed that now when you !finger anybody to see when they logged in
last, it says "never logged in"  For any user that I've tried.  I guess all
recent login information has been lost?
keesan
response 279 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 01:57 UTC 2005

I got garbage again the first time I dialed in but different looking garbage,
and the same wrttmp message.
drew
response 280 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 03:30 UTC 2005

Re #274 and 275:
    Out of curiosity I checked out a copy of Spinrite. It seems to do the
usual sector checking and attempted 'fixing', with five different levels of
intervention. But in addition, I've found a screen called "SMART settings"
that went something like this:

   attribute   event cnt   margin
---------------------------------
 ecc corrected: 0             149
rd chan margin: not reported
relocated sect: 0              60
realloc events: 0
   seek errors: 0              49
 spin-up retry: 0              49
 recal retries: 0              49
cabling errors: 0
 uncorrectable: 0
  write errors: 0             149
   temperature: 40'c /104'f
 power-on time: 5,271

Not sure it means anything; a 'margin' of 149 sectors out of 63*255*thousands
seems rather tiny. But I think this is supposed to be the 'bypassing the drive
electronics' part of the program.

    Spinrite also works on VMWare virtual machines. However, the SMART screen
does not appear; instead there's a message saying that SMART data is not being
reported.
steve
response 281 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 05:22 UTC 2005

   /var/log/wrttmp seems OK to me.  Is anyone else seeing problems
with anything?  The modems are a seperate issue, I think.
drew
response 282 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 05:28 UTC 2005

/var/log/wrttmp seems to be restricted-read. is it supposed to be?
russ
response 283 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 12:41 UTC 2005

The wrttmp problem is breaking "amin".
aruba
response 284 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 13:27 UTC 2005

I get this when I log on:

mesg: Unable to open /var/log/wrttmp to read/write

I guess the mesg program needs access to that directory.
eprom
response 285 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 15:17 UTC 2005

looks like /log wasn't permed correctly

last: /var/log/wtmp: Permission denied

mesg: Unable to open /var/log/wrttmp to read/write
steve
response 286 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 21:41 UTC 2005

   The /log problem is fixed.
mary
response 287 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 8 23:25 UTC 2005

Thanks, STeve, for spending a gorgeous Saturday, working on Grex.  And 
another thanks to Mark for picking up the new disk and seeing it got to 
STeve and that STeve got to Provide.  

Is newuser still off?
jor
response 288 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 9 00:52 UTC 2005


steve
response 289 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 9 01:35 UTC 2005

   Yes, its still down.  I need to finish ressuresting the accounts that
got munged.  This next week looks to be better crazy wise, so I should
get it done in the next day or so.
keesan
response 290 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 9 02:20 UTC 2005

I have changed my script to dial the second modem (0513) and no longer get
garbage.  Could someone replace the first modem, assuming we have another
working one?  Steve et al, thanks.
steve
response 291 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 9 02:50 UTC 2005

   I'm sure we have spares.  I forgot to reset the modei yesterday.  That
might be a good thing to do.
   So you've narrowed it down to the first modem.  Good and thanks.
twenex
response 292 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 9 15:45 UTC 2005

Thanks, Steve and team.
keesan
response 293 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 10 01:12 UTC 2005

Someone else told me the first modem was bad.  At least switch the two.
steve
response 294 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 10 01:36 UTC 2005

   Next time I'm there I will.  We need to have both of them
working.
albaugh
response 295 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 10 22:41 UTC 2005

It looks like grex went of the 'net for about half an hour just after 6pm.
tsty
response 296 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 11 17:47 UTC 2005

re #280 ... that disk was in pretty darn good shape based on those data.
  
i have seen errors found/fixed inthe    200,000 + range (ForReal!)(tm).
they were primarily ecc errors but other junk showed up in the 100,000+
range on other 'stuff'.
  
albaugh
response 297 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 11 19:16 UTC 2005

Does the bounce below from excite.com imply that one or more grex twits are
responsible for getting grex blacklisted re: mail delivery to excite.com?
(identifying information suppressed)


From MAILER-DAEMON Fri May 06 12:54:00 2005
Envelope-to: a_user@cyberspace.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:54:00 -0400
X-Failed-Recipients: a_user@excite.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@cyberspace.org>
To: a_user@cyberspace.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:54:00 -0400

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  a_user@excite.com
    SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<a_user@excite.com>:
    host xmxpita.excite.com [208.45.133.107]: 554 Service unavailable; Client
    ho
st [216.86.77.194] blocked using dynablock.excite.com; Your message could not
be
 delivered due to complaints we received regarding the IP address you're using
 o
r your ISP. See http://blackholes.excite.com/ Error:
    WS-02

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <a_user@cyberspace.org>
Received: from a_user by grex.cyberspace.org with local (Exim 4.42)
        id 1DU65L-0006qP-U4
        for a_user@excite.com; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:55 -0400
To: a_user@excite.com
Subject: a_subject
Message-Id: <E1DU65L-0006qP-U4@grex.cyberspace.org>
From: a_user's_name <a_user@cyberspace.org>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:55 -0400

a_subject

scholar
response 298 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 11 22:03 UTC 2005

better get steve to write a few  e-mails to abuse@gmail.com
naftee
response 299 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 11 22:33 UTC 2005

a_steve
keesan
response 300 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 13 14:01 UTC 2005

Are we supposed to have a ping command?  It tells me 'not found'.  I was
wondering why sdf.lonestar.org suddenly froze up and cannot be accessed now.
rksjr
response 301 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 13 17:32 UTC 2005

Re. #300: I tried the "finger" command circa 1:05 p.m. and got the 
following results:

> finger @sdf.lonestar.org
[sdf.lonestar.org/192.94.73.1]
must provide username

> finger staff@sdf.lonestar.org
[sdf.lonestar.org/192.94.73.1]
finger: staff: no such user

Given that the attempt to "finger" didn't time-out, I assume that they 
are at least partially "up".

If lonestar has an uptime report page similar to that of Grex, you might 
find more information there.

          http://www.cyberspace.org/cgi-bin/uptime
keesan
response 302 of 457: Mark Unseen   May 13 20:13 UTC 2005

They are online again now, but I was simply wondering why we have no ping.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   253-277   278-302   303-327   328-352   353-377   378-402   403-427 
 428-452   453-457         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss