|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 603 responses total. |
janc
|
|
response 275 of 603:
| 
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
112
|
janc
|
|
response 276 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
113
|
janc
|
|
response 277 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
114
|
janc
|
|
response 278 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
115
|
janc
|
|
response 279 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
116
|
janc
|
|
response 280 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
117
|
janc
|
|
response 281 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
118
|
janc
|
|
response 282 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
119
|
janc
|
|
response 283 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
120
|
janc
|
|
response 284 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
121
|
janc
|
|
response 285 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
122
|
janc
|
|
response 286 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
123
|
janc
|
|
response 287 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
124
|
janc
|
|
response 288 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:50 UTC 1995 |
125
|
janc
|
|
response 289 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
126
|
janc
|
|
response 290 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
127
|
janc
|
|
response 291 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
128
|
janc
|
|
response 292 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
129
|
janc
|
|
response 293 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
130
|
janc
|
|
response 294 of 603:
|
Jun 6 20:51 UTC 1995 |
131
|
remmers
|
|
response 295 of 603:
|
Jun 6 22:19 UTC 1995 |
How come no responses were entered at 16:42?
|
srw
|
|
response 296 of 603:
|
Jun 10 18:59 UTC 1995 |
This is a test of janc's incredible new text collector. I will enter all of
this text, but I am refusing to type any <cr> characters. The result is quite
clever.
|
janc
|
|
response 297 of 603:
|
Jun 11 13:14 UTC 1995 |
What all that was up there was me running a little program to test what return
codes inspired Marcus's PicoSpan program to do interesting things. Turns out
like this:
/* Return codes recognized by PicoSpan (but ignored by Yapp) */
#define RET_ENTER 67 /* Silently enter the response */
#define RET_ABORT 66 /* Discard the response, and print a warning */
#define RET_ASKOK 58 /* Ask which of the above the user wants */
and returning 73 does something weird I didn't figure out. 0 does the same
as 58. You'll have noticed 66 and 73 are missing from the above.
I have no clue where these numbers came from.
|
janc
|
|
response 298 of 603:
|
Jun 11 22:37 UTC 1995 |
this is a test of a test of the the this.
|
janc
|
|
response 299 of 603:
|
Jun 11 22:49 UTC 1995 |
this is a test of a test of the the this.
|