You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   248-272   273-297   298-322   323-347   348-372   373-384    
 
Author Message
25 new of 384 responses total.
ryan
response 273 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 13:30 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rational
response 274 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 13:32 UTC 2004

send it 2 uce, newB.
aruba
response 275 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 15:09 UTC 2004

I get around 40 spams a day on Grex, thanks to several of my addresses being
on the web.  I, for one, am pretty annoyed by it, but I don't know what we
can do.  Of course, I don't know how many more I'd be getting without
Marcus's spam filter, but my sense is still that his approach isn't working.
Can we allow users to filter their own spam on the new machine?
katie
response 276 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 15:43 UTC 2004

I get hundreds of spam messages per week. I often delete important
real email by mistake while deleting the spam. It is very irritating.
tod
response 277 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 16:27 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 278 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 18:09 UTC 2004

Yes, 90+ percent of the e-mail I receive at grex is SPAM.  I haven't yet made
the effort to set up procmail rules to try to filter out the obvious ones...
keesan
response 279 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 21:04 UTC 2004

You can try my .procmailrc (and .forward) - I filter out about 2/3 of my spam
that way.  Maybe more, as I am sending some larger categories to /dev/null
and just saving stuff that might also be real mail (hi, hello, test....).
tod
response 280 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 22:47 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 281 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 23:35 UTC 2004

Only add names of people you want mail from at the beginning if you find that
mail from them is ending up in your spam folder(s).  I filter into different
folders out of curiosity - you could filter it all to /bulk/ instead.  
I was filtering 'hi' 'hello' and 'test' because of a recent virus that no
longer appears to be around (the SCO virus) so you should probably remove
those filters or you might catch a lot of friends in them.  If you tend to
get mail from your friends on the subject of medications, or refinancing,
remove those filters too.  When something slips through my filters, I look
at the header to see what I might filter on - sometimes  something simple
like X-Authentication or X-Mailer that nobody else uses.
Half the Nigeria spams get through - I might add 'Good Morning'.
tod
response 282 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 23:50 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 283 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 01:30 UTC 2004

When you set up a filter, it automatically creates folders when it catches
spam for them.  You can mkdir to create them yourself in ~/mail.  You can also
save mail to folders and they will be created.  To see the different folders,
type L while in Pine.  I delete my folders after looking in them and finding
nothing but spam.
tod
response 284 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 15:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 285 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 19:59 UTC 2004

Congratulations on your first three filtered spams!  Today I added a filter
for X-MSMail-Priority:.* when I got two spams with that in the header (type
H to see the header).  Trying to sell vkiagra.
keesan
response 286 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 20:07 UTC 2004

Which twit accounts are currently active?  I would like to fit all the twits
onto one line of my twit filter.   Is the polytarp account, or the dah or
asddsa or naftee or dah account still open?  
rational
response 287 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 20:08 UTC 2004

None of those accounts are still active.
salad
response 288 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 20:15 UTC 2004

Neither are the boltwitz account(s) .  You might want to add the coopcf
account, since  I plan on adding some more shit with that account.
remmers
response 289 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 29 12:21 UTC 2004

You can find that out using the 'finger' command.  For example,
"!finger -m asddsa" yields "no such user".
salad
response 290 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 29 17:17 UTC 2004

That's not foolproof.  The 'naftee' account still exists but I can't use it.
asddsa
response 291 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 29 17:18 UTC 2004

re 289 Not anymore!
jhudson
response 292 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 1 17:11 UTC 2004

Since *all* of my e-mail is spam, I set up a rule to bounce it all.
tod
response 293 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 00:21 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 294 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 01:20 UTC 2004

Glad to hear it - how many do you catch every day?
Jim finally succeeded in attaching a file to webmail he was sending with
opera, and mailed it to me. It is plain text.  I got the email without the
attachment but with the following explanation:


--------
WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by MIMEDefang.  Following this
paragraph are indications of the actual changes made.  For more
information about your site's MIMEDefang policy, contact
Frisco Roque/Rex Roof <admins@localhost>.  For more information about
MIMEDefang, see:

            http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/enduser.php3

A non-multipart attachment named feb29.eml was removed from this document as it
constituted a security hazard.  If you require this document, please contact
the sender and arrange an alternate means of receiving it.


  [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]

this has one attachmeent of text. feb29.eml from /D/kermit/

rcurl
response 295 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 01:23 UTC 2004

Would it have gone through if it had been .txt instead? Some filters are
on the extensions. 
keesan
response 296 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 02:41 UTC 2004

That is what I told Jim.  I have no idea what .eml meant to him.  email?
I recall sending .slk files which Windows interpreted as Excel when they were
slovak.  We can't use smtp mail until he figures out the smtp server for WCC
-anyone know that?  He wants to compose offline, so he ended up composing the
mail at home, uploading it to grex, importing it into the message body,
sending it to himself at WCC, going to webmail there, and forwarding it.  He
sent me a test mail and it got defanged.  He wants the From address to be at
wcc - is there some way to set Pine to show a reply-to address or a From
address other than grex?  
gelinas
response 297 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 02:53 UTC 2004

No, it's not possible to reset the "From:" field in Pine on grex.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   248-272   273-297   298-322   323-347   348-372   373-384    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss