|
Grex > Agora56 > #105: State: Wal-Mart must carry emergency contraception | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 526 responses total. |
slynne
|
|
response 273 of 526:
|
Mar 2 18:51 UTC 2006 |
I just think it will be interesting when Republican candidates have to
face a choice. Do they support National Health Care in order to get big
business on their side or do they listen to the voters on the right who
seem to mostly be against it.
Just out of curiosity, nharmon, how many frivolous malpractice suits do
you think there are? I think there are a lot fewer than you might like
to think. And how would you make a law that would prevent frivolous
malpractice suits and not prevent legitimate ones?
I think a high deductible health insurance plan might be something that
can work but only if everyone is required to join it.
|
twenex
|
|
response 274 of 526:
|
Mar 2 18:52 UTC 2006 |
I'm assuming the first part of 268 was referring to 265, and not 267? :)
Correct. My mistake.
if the government just foot the bill,
I'm curious: How do you tax-haters think the government would pay for things
if there were no taxes?
You see, the United States already has a national healthcare
system, but it is for former military personnel. Tod mentioned it in
266, its called the VA. It is highly bureaucratic, and gets often gets
drawn into politics.
I'm yet to be convinced that the market works well enough to render the
alternative of bureaucracy undesirable. It certainly doesn't work well enough
when it's weighted in favour of big enterprise rather than market forces, as
it is in the US and UK.
I don't think the US could afford to build a system like the VA that
could treat everybody. So what then? Do we claim eminent domain and
yank public hospitals into a Federal health system? That'll go over
real well.
Why not? The UK can afford it.
IMHO, the best thing the government can do right now is (1) make health
care more affordable by putting an end to frivolous malpractice
lawsuits/extortion, (2) provide a high-deductible health insurance plan
for everyone, and (3) maintain a medicare/medicaid system for poor
people.
One of the things the US and UK governments have historically been worst at
is making sure free markets work properly; see my comments in paragraph 2.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 275 of 526:
|
Mar 2 19:27 UTC 2006 |
"APPLETON, WI. (UPI) - Nadean Cool, 44, has sued her psychiatrist for
malpractice in a suit alleging that Dr. Kenneth Olson convinced her
that she had 120 personalities, then billed her insurance company for
group therapy. Her insurance carrier, after adding up bills it paid for
her psychiatric care -- about $300,000 -- has joined the suit. Ms Cool
claims that Olson said her 120 personalities included a duck and
angels. Thankfully, it appears no one is alleging Cool is mentally
healthy."
> Just out of curiosity, nharmon, how many frivolous malpractice suits
> do you think there are?
Well, frivolous malpractice lawsuits have been cited as being the major
cause of the outrageous insurance premiums that doctors have to pay.
This raises medical prices.
> How do you tax-haters think the government would pay for things
> if there were no taxes?
Most of us tax-haters aren't against all taxes.
> Why not? The UK can afford [a system like the VA that could treat
> everybody].
Well, taxes are a lot higher in the UK than in the US, so they can
afford more things. Plus, you have a higher population density, whereas
in the US people are spread out.
|
tod
|
|
response 276 of 526:
|
Mar 2 19:34 UTC 2006 |
Thursday, March 2, 2006; Posted: 11:36 a.m. EST (16:36 GMT)
NAPLES, Florida (AP) -- If Domino's Pizza founder Thomas S. Monaghan has his
way, a new town being built in Florida will be governed according to strict
Roman Catholic principles, with no place to get an abortion, pornography or
birth control.
The pizza magnate is bankrolling the project with at least $250 million and
calls it "God's will."
Civil libertarians say the plan is unconstitutional and are threatening to
sue.
The town of Ave Maria is being constructed around Ave Maria University, the
first Catholic university to be built in the United States in about 40 years.
Both are set to open next year about 25 miles east of Naples in southwestern
Florida.
The town and the university, developed in partnership with the Barron Collier
Co., an agricultural and real estate business, will be set on 5,000 acres with
a European-inspired town center, a massive church and what planners call the
largest crucifix in the nation, at nearly 65 feet tall. Monaghan envisions
11,000 homes and 20,000 residents.
During a speech last year at a Catholic men's gathering in Boston, Monaghan
said that in his community, stores will not sell pornographic magazines,
pharmacies will not carry condoms or birth control pills, and cable television
will have no X-rated channels.
Homebuyers in Ave Maria will own their property outright. But Monaghan and
Barron Collier will control all commercial real estate in the town, meaning
they could insert provisions in leases to restrict the sale of certain items.
"I believe all of history is just one big battle between good and evil. I
don't want to be on the sidelines," Monaghan, who sold Domino's Pizza in 1998
to devote himself to doing good works, said in a recent Newsweek interview.
Robert Falls, a spokesman for the project, said Tuesday that attorneys are
still reviewing the legal issues and that Monaghan had no comment in the
meantime.
"If they attempt to do what he apparently wants to do, the people of Naples
and Collier County, Florida, are in for a whole series of legal and
constitutional problems and a lot of litigation indefinitely into the future,"
warned Howard Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union
of Florida.
Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist said it will be up to the courts to
decide the legalities of the plan. "The community has the right to provide
a wholesome environment," he said. "If someone disagrees, they have the right
to go to court and present facts before a judge."
Gov. Jeb Bush, at the site's groundbreaking earlier this month, lauded the
development as a new kind of town where faith and freedom will merge to create
a community of like-minded citizens. Bush, a convert to Catholicism, did not
speak specifically to the proposed restrictions.
"While the governor does not personally believe in abortion or pornography,
the town, and any restrictions they may place on businesses choosing to locate
there, must comply with the laws and constitution of the state and federal
governments," Russell Schweiss, a spokesman for the governor, said Tuesday.
Frances Kissling, president of the liberal Washington-based Catholics for a
Free Choice, likened Monaghan's concept to Islamic fundamentalism.
"This is un-American," Kissling said. "I don't think in a democratic society
you can have a legally organized township that will seek to have any kind of
public service whatsoever and try to restrict the constitutional rights of
citizens."
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/03/02/catholic.town.ap
|
edina
|
|
response 277 of 526:
|
Mar 2 19:48 UTC 2006 |
Well I know who *won't* be moving to Ave Maria, FL.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 278 of 526:
|
Mar 2 19:52 UTC 2006 |
protestant fundies? they already have their own homeland.
|
richard
|
|
response 279 of 526:
|
Mar 2 19:58 UTC 2006 |
I assume mr. monagahan's town will have public roads going through it, use
public electricity and public phone lines. I assume he wants to locate
his town in the state of Florida in the United States. Therefore he must
observer all federal and state laws that apply. We can't have rich
dictators creating their own little states within states.
|
tod
|
|
response 280 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:02 UTC 2006 |
Why not? It wouldn't be the first town to be religiously owned in Florida.
see http://scientology.fso.org/
|
richard
|
|
response 281 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:02 UTC 2006 |
and they should ban the 65-foot crucifix. Way too tall. Something that tall
is trying to rub their religion in the faces of non-believers. There is a
reason for building codes.
|
richard
|
|
response 282 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:04 UTC 2006 |
re #280 because you can't violate the united states constitution and bill of
rights no matter where you live in this country, even if you own a whole town.
Monagahan does not get to not obey the bill of rights just by building a town.
Not when that town is in the United States.
Let him go build his town on an island somewhere
|
jep
|
|
response 283 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:10 UTC 2006 |
re resp:279: You're willing to let people do drugs and be prostitutes
and any number of other things, but not to form their own town and live
how they want to because their laws would be based on religion? Why
not?
|
tod
|
|
response 284 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:10 UTC 2006 |
re #281
and they should ban the 65-foot crucifix
It wouldn't be the first. Cell phone companies hire stealth technology
companies all the time to help them "hide" their cell towers with things like
big tall crucifixes and church bell towers.
re #282
because you can't violate the united states constitution and bill of
rights no matter where you live in this country, even if you own a whole
town.
Then why is the 2nd Amendment banned in Washington, D.C.?
|
klg
|
|
response 285 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:11 UTC 2006 |
As a wise man once said, if you think health care is expensive now,
just wait until it's free.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 286 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:12 UTC 2006 |
Are we talking about what basically ammounts to a supersized private
property community that is based on religion? Its quite surprising that
Richard is willing to use the government to deny these people their
right to free exercise of their religion.
|
twenex
|
|
response 287 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:14 UTC 2006 |
Klg:
(a). Nationalized healthcare (or nationalized anything else) isn't "free",
since EVERYONE pays for it.
(b). You really expect anyone with half a braincell to believe you'd know a
wise man if one walked up to you and exploded?
|
tod
|
|
response 288 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:16 UTC 2006 |
Richard never heard of Wisconsin vs. Yoder, apparently.
|
twenex
|
|
response 289 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:17 UTC 2006 |
The establishment of religion forbidden is.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 290 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:20 UTC 2006 |
Not exactly Jeff. The state establishment is religion is forbidden. A
private entity is free to establish religion, and has a right to
exercise it.
|
kingjon
|
|
response 291 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:21 UTC 2006 |
"The establishment of religion" *by Congress* "forbidden is."
|
twenex
|
|
response 292 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:22 UTC 2006 |
(I know; i was just playing on the "Yoder", bit. Maybe you have to speak a
non-rhotic accent to get it.)
|
tod
|
|
response 293 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:22 UTC 2006 |
Thanks Yoda ;)
|
nharmon
|
|
response 294 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:22 UTC 2006 |
Oh, I get it now.
|
slynne
|
|
response 295 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:32 UTC 2006 |
When I first read about Monahans Catholic town, it reminded me of a
former Mnetter Sean Hastings and his idea of "seascaping". I have this
weird feeling that Monahan would probably love the idea of a community
floating out in international waters where he would make up all the
rules he wants.
|
twenex
|
|
response 296 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:34 UTC 2006 |
IIRC, Pennsylvania was born as a colony for Puritans.
|
tod
|
|
response 297 of 526:
|
Mar 2 20:44 UTC 2006 |
Well, I'll testify to the fact that PA is now full of horndogs.
|