You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   2-26   27-51   52-76   77-101   102-126   127-151   152-176   177-201 
 202-226   227-251   252-276   277-301   302-326   327-332     
 
Author Message
25 new of 332 responses total.
jp2
response 27 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 13:58 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

scott
response 28 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 14:03 UTC 2001

Oops, put it in the wrong item.

I hereby decline my nomination.
richard
response 29 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 20:05 UTC 2001

I nominate Sylvia (Bhelliom) and leslie (arabella)  both are longtime
grexers who would make excellent board members.  new blood is always good
on the board!
krj
response 30 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 21:43 UTC 2001

I would like to nominate Marcus Watts/mdw for re-election.
jp2
response 31 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 21:46 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 32 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 23:33 UTC 2001

I'll post a summary from time to time.  As of the moment:

  Nominated:
        other
        eeyore
        janc
        cmcgee
        mary
        davel
        scott
        jp2
        bhelliom
        arabella
        mdw
  Accepted:
        mary
        jp2
  Declined:
        janc
        davel
        scott

Anybody feel free to correct any mistakes.

Folks who are nominated by the November 15 can change their minds
about accepting or declining anytime before December 1, which is
when voting starts.
aruba
response 33 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 03:59 UTC 2001

I nominate Dan Velleman (orinoco).
arabella
response 34 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 01:06 UTC 2001

Thanks for the nomination, Richard.  Actually, I was a member of the
very first Grex Board, back in 1992 (and yes, we often met at people's
houses, and took collections of money from board members to keep
Grex afloat.  Ah, those were the days).  I'm afraid I'll have to
decline, despite my desire to serve Grex, as my future travel schedule
will very likely preclude me from attending board meetings on a regular
basis.

However, I'd like to nominate Ken Josenhans (login krj), as he's
heavily involved with Grex already, and would make a splendid
representative of our family on the board.

richard
response 35 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 03:08 UTC 2001

but doesnt krj work nights? actually I guess if he's working, he can
call the grex staff meeting and listen in.  Just need somebody present
with a cell phone or something.
jp2
response 36 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 03:26 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 37 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 03:44 UTC 2001

I heartily second the nomination of krj.  He doesn't work nights, last I
heard.
richard
response 38 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 04:52 UTC 2001

although if krj runs, there could be the great virtual candidates debate
between krj and jp2.  Have it on party and see who outlasts who.  Of course
there is the possibility they might BOTH get elected, which means they
would most likely cancel each other's votes out every time, thereby
effectively reducing the size of the board from seven to five.  But Im sure
those meetings wouldnt be dull!  
janc
response 39 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:17 UTC 2001

Does krj come across on like as a firey or contentious character?  Sometimes
knowing people face-to-face totally alters their on-line appearance.
jp2
response 40 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:22 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 41 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:38 UTC 2001

If you consider M-Net's current financial position to be "good," then 
that alone shows you to be undesireable as a Grex board member..  ;)
jp2
response 42 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:41 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

orinoco
response 43 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:46 UTC 2001

I'll accept my nomination.
aruba
response 44 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:11 UTC 2001

Yay!
bhelliom
response 45 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:17 UTC 2001

I also accept my nomiation.  Mark, kick me if I haven't given you 
membership cash by next meeting.  I've kept forgetting to do it.
carson
response 46 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 00:27 UTC 2001

I encourage Megan (eeyore) to accept her nomination.
lelande
response 47 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 00:56 UTC 2001

45 is such a fucking pigfaced lie
eeyore
response 48 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 04:45 UTC 2001

I'm thinking about it.  Kinda want to, kinda don't think I know what in hell
is going on most of the time.
mary
response 49 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 11:20 UTC 2001

I'm really hoping that janc reconsiders and lets the voters decide
if he could be of value on the Board.  I'd most certainly like
to see him there.  He's a fine leader.

Have we heard from other yet?  If he doesn't agree to run I'll
break his knees.  Enough said.

I'd very much like to see eeyore run again.  But I won't break
her knees if she decides she'd rather not.
krj
response 50 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 15:36 UTC 2001

Jamie in resp:40 ::  such *power* I have over M-net!  Bwa-ha-ha-ha!!
other
response 51 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 17:40 UTC 2001

re #49  

That is the most gut-rendingly hilarious backhanded endorsement I have 
ever received.  
 0-24   2-26   27-51   52-76   77-101   102-126   127-151   152-176   177-201 
 202-226   227-251   252-276   277-301   302-326   327-332     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss