You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   2-26   27-51   52-76   77-84      
 
Author Message
25 new of 84 responses total.
jaklumen
response 27 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 11:40 UTC 2001

*nod* I figured the opposite was true, but wasn't quite sure as to 
reasons why.
oval
response 28 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:14 UTC 2001

i find it odd that this "sexuality" conf is more about psychology than
sexuality with lots of sweeping gender generalizations. 
senna
response 29 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:47 UTC 2001

So contribute your views if you don't like it.
oval
response 30 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 01:03 UTC 2001

humans are humans. women have cunts, men have cocks. drop the guilt, stick
it where you wanna and LIKE IT.
phenix
response 31 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:08 UTC 2001

i like oval:)
cyklone
response 32 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:26 UTC 2001

I vote yes!
flem
response 33 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 16:51 UTC 2001

I don't think it's odd that the sex conf is more about psychology and gender
issues than actual bumpin' and squishin'.  There's only so many times you can
say "I like to cum on young girls' tits" before everyone stops caring.  
phenix
response 34 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 17:18 UTC 2001

or stops bothering to call you a pedophile:)
but yha, it's all about the squishy luv thing
or at least about how fucked up you are
senna
response 35 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 21:30 UTC 2001

The real discussion comes from more complex issues that don't have easy
answers.  Questions like "do you like it up the ass?" typically elicit
one-sentence answers with little room for elaboration.  The question needs
more meat to it.
jaklumen
response 36 of 84: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 21:54 UTC 2001

and I suppose it can be amusing sometimes to think senna meant 
something more when he said "more meat to it."

But seriously, I think we get enough of the joking and crude comments 
that may come from misinformation about sex, or perhaps the attitudes 
that surround various taboos.  We're just attempting to talk 
intelligently without feeling the need to coat it with raunch.

However, analyzing the issues to death is extreme in the other 
direction; thus, I suppose, we attempt to discuss without psychobabble 
or detached clinical stances.  Honesty is good, but I think we are 
trying to find a balance.
lelande
response 37 of 84: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 18:39 UTC 2002

30 oval
what happens when a human born a male is given a cunt through surgery as an
infant? what is this human, then?
oval
response 38 of 84: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 23:05 UTC 2002

does he keeo the cock?
lelande
response 39 of 84: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 21:59 UTC 2002

his cock got keyed, actually. all scratched. needed a new paint job.
eskarina
response 40 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 01:56 UTC 2002

I have a question.

Does anyone besides jaklumen have a clue what Exodus International is/does?

Everyone's doing it, I'll add a website:  www.bridges-across.org
phenix
response 41 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 03:12 UTC 2002

wtf is it then
brighn
response 42 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 03:59 UTC 2002

Exodus International teaches gays to be straight.
brighn
response 43 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 04:00 UTC 2002

http://www.exodusnorthamerica.org/aboutus/
jazz
response 44 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 15:19 UTC 2002

        This is terribly, terribly un-PC, but I think I have a handle on
another reason the idea of reparative therapy might be reasonable.  I've run
into quite a number of people, personally, who have attractions to both
genders, but have had such strained relations, or one sufficiently strained
relation, with the opposite gender they've turned solely to the same gender.
Oftentimes they overly strongly identify with their new preference, touting
to the world that they're gay, as if in an effort to convince themselves.
I can't see a reason why curing those problems, and those strained relations,
through therapy *wouldn't* be a good thing.
brighn
response 45 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 15:30 UTC 2002

Oh, I agree. I think most people are born bisexual, though (or, at least, with
the capacity for bisexuality).
 
Anything which increases the amount of positive interactions you can have with
others isn't a bad thing.
oval
response 46 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 21:02 UTC 2002

do they reparative therapy for those who want to go from straight to gay?
brighn
response 47 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 21:48 UTC 2002

I haven't heard of it. The whole point is straight="fixed", gay="broken." You
don't repair things that aren't broken.
jazz
response 48 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 22:06 UTC 2002

        There probably would be if straights were discriminated against
randomly, beat up, and ostracized from their families for being straight or
bringing home their opposite-sex partner.
brighn
response 49 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 22:14 UTC 2002

Bisexuals are, but that's only in gay communities. ;}
jazz
response 50 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 22:24 UTC 2002

        They don't get the full membership package, and sometimes suffer from
sarcasm and wit that can only be imagined in straight circles, but they don't
generally get beat up by bisexuophobes, or ostracized from their families.

        Is it as bad in the gay male community as it is in the gay female
community?  A lot of the lesbians I know really are in it for the benefits
package, and not a kinsey 6.
brighn
response 51 of 84: Mark Unseen   Apr 3 22:25 UTC 2002

Beaten up, no. Ostracized from the "family," yes.
 0-24   2-26   27-51   52-76   77-84      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss