You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-333      
 
Author Message
25 new of 333 responses total.
rcurl
response 269 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 15:42 UTC 2006

I see what people mean about a problem with e-mail. I had sent a message here
a few days ago that arrived within minutes, but last night I sent one that
has still not arrived after nearly 12 hours.
keesan
response 270 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 19:40 UTC 2006

ssh did not work just now but telnet does.  Please someone remove the email
not working message from last week (motd).
krj
response 271 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 21:05 UTC 2006

My unscientific observation is that my incoming and outgoing mail
have stopped working for approximately the last 24 hours.
 
I realize that some of this is still my fault for not having moved
to a modern mail platform.
rcurl
response 272 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 22:45 UTC 2006

I have received some mail dated today, but not what I sent yesterday. Has it
gone into a black hole?
keesan
response 273 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 23:34 UTC 2006

I got three mails from AOL today (they have fixed the problem of refusing to
accept mails from us too).
keesan
response 274 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 02:06 UTC 2006

sdf.lonestar.org is working now, but freeshell.org is not, and the disk quotas
all set themselves to 0 (with 400MB free) and I had to 'tweak' them - I
wonder what people do who have not paid for the use of 'tweak'.  I posted this
info for people who signed up at freeshell.org for more reliable email than
grex, which has been astonishingly reliable recently.
rcurl
response 275 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 14:28 UTC 2006

After a few days with no spam, the dam broke this morning and 21 spam messages
poured in. But the message I sent two days ago has not. Where is it?
keesan
response 276 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 15:53 UTC 2006

Your message must have drowned in the flood of spam.
davel
response 277 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:16 UTC 2006

I also am seeing much more spam.  OTOH, SMTP connections are not being
closed (or much, much less frequently) with that too-many-smtp-connections
message.  I suspect no mere coincidence.
mcnally
response 278 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:25 UTC 2006

 In an attempt to end the backlogs that were causing many valid
 messages to be dropped, I disabled two of the three spam blacklist
 checks to see whether that would improve mail delivery.  Apparently
 it hasn't had any affect on the delay problems people are complaining
 about, only facilitated the delivery of more spam.

 I'll put back the copy of the exim configuration I kept from before
 my changes, restoring the status ante.

 I apologize for the extra spam; it was an experiment to see whether
 some tuning of the system would help the situation; unfortunately I
 don't know enough about exim to figure out how to increase the
 number of simultaneous connections it will accept.  I *do* know that
 the mail log is full of dropped connections, constantly, and it 
 would be nice if whoever committed us to exim would look at them.
keesan
response 279 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:33 UTC 2006

Mike, could you set up some simple script that would let people use
spamassassin?  I have never ever had a false positive (I only require three
points to dump suspected mail) but still sometimes get false negatives.
Spamassassin with 3 points was getting at least 3/4 of my spam.  (I added some
more filters on top of it).  Unfortunately it puts some large files into a
./.spamassassin directory but they could be deleted automatically at login.
rcurl
response 280 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:38 UTC 2006

Re #278 - so my message to me here was killed by a Grex spam filter? From 
a UM server address? Why would any of those be in a spam blacklist?
cyklone
response 281 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 16:58 UTC 2006

In case you are unaware, some ISPs, etc, filter HARD on umich.edu. I know 
from experience because several times in the last year or so I've had that 
problem with another ISP I use blocking the umich mail. There reasons were 
quite understandable. Apparently, a lot of spam or other problems involve 
umich.edu addresses. I was once told it had to do with all the freebies 
the students download using their umich accounts (presumably a reference 
to the hidden "zombieware" some freebies contain) though I don't know the 
details. In any case, if you haven't learned already, be warned now: a 
umich.edu address is apt to be filtered by any number if ISPs for any 
number of reasons. I'd suggest an alternate address for time-critical 
communications.
keesan
response 282 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 12:18 UTC 2006

I cannot send mail from grex or even postpone it.
keesan
response 283 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 12:52 UTC 2006

Sdf.lonestar.org is also inaccessible again.  When I try to telnet
it gets stuck - how do I exit from the attempt (in DOS, Ctrl-C
does not work)?
lorance
response 284 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 17:35 UTC 2006

I've never used telnet under DOS, but in UNIX if you enter Control-]
you should get a prompt. Enter q and press enter and you should quit.
If you don't get the prompt then I have no idea.
keesan
response 285 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 18:01 UTC 2006

Thanks.  First time today sdf at freeshell was 'down', an hour later
it had been up for over 3 days.  ???
davel
response 286 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 18:13 UTC 2006

I'm not able to get any mail at all into Grex.
keesan
response 287 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 18:16 UTC 2006

Ctrl-] works when I am ssh'ed to grex, but what I need is a way to
end a telnet attempt FROM grex to freeshell/lonestar.  
mcnally
response 288 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 11 07:42 UTC 2006

 re #280: 
 > so my message to me here was killed by a Grex spam filter?

 I have no way of knowing that, but probably not.  Delaying messages
 from sites that are believed to be spam sites potentially affects
 delivery of messages from all sites.  Let's say that Grex is configured
 to support N simultaneous mail connections at any given time.  Now imagine
 a whole bunch of sites that are listed in these RBLs connect and attempt 
 to deliver messages.  Because they're listed in the RBLs their connections
 are intentionally delayed to slow down spam delivery.  What happens if
 N of these sites are being kept waiting while your non-blacklisted mail
 site attempts to make the N+1th connection?  

 If I understand the system properly your connection, the N+1th, 
 is rejected because the mail server is busy and it's assumed that
 the host trying to deliver it will reconnect later when the Grex
 server isn't busy.  But from what I see in the log files I think
 we're being more or less constantly bombarded with connections
 from other hosts and there's never a time when Grex's server is not
 busy and dropping connections from other hosts that want to connect.

 I really hope I'm misunderstanding something fundamental here
 but whether I am or not something is clearly very wrong with mail
 delivery.
keesan
response 289 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 11 12:51 UTC 2006

Grex is not accepting mail for the last day or two, and yesterday (and
probably today) was not sending mail either.  What is the problem and is
anyone working on it?   I have a couple of craigslist ads listing my grex
address, because freeshell was broken at the time.
keesan
response 290 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 01:36 UTC 2006

fastmail.fm offers 10MB webmail without ads.  Login at least 8 characters.
rcurl
response 291 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 02:50 UTC 2006

When are we going to get e-mail back on Grex? Or is now the time to "jump
ship" from using Grex for e-mail?
nharmon
response 292 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 11:42 UTC 2006

Some of us "jumped ship" a long time ago.
slynne
response 293 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 12 12:50 UTC 2006

As much as I hate to say this, I dont think that grex currently has the 
staff needed to maintain email up to the standards we all would like. 
This is especially true since there are so many excellent free email 
services out there (like gmail). 
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-333      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss