You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   240-264   265-289   290-314   315-339   340-364   365-389   390-414   415-439 
 440-464   465-489   490-514   515-539   540-564   565-589   590-610    
 
Author Message
25 new of 610 responses total.
valerie
response 265 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 2 13:08 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 266 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 2 14:03 UTC 1998

Not Rice Krispy Treats, or any other form of cereal. But the food
*is* solid in form, not liquid or powder.
lilmo
response 267 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 16:36 UTC 1998

Do those vitamins occur in the regular ingredients, or are they added to make
it look good?  :-)
(vitamins AND minerals, that is)
valerie
response 268 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 12:05 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 269 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 14:52 UTC 1998

Sorry, not Pop Tarts. This thing is ready to eat and not anything that 
one has to prepare by heating, toasting, etc.

This is a somewhat obscure puzzler, I think, so I'll count as correct 
the first person to come up with the right general category and won't 
expect to see a brand name.
i
response 270 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 22:28 UTC 1998

Some sort of Yuppie Chow Good-4-U Meal Bar?
lilmo
response 271 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 01:14 UTC 1998

is #267 being ignored, or overlooked?
remmers
response 272 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 15:16 UTC 1998

I wasn't sure how to respond to #267, so I put off doing so,
and then forgot about it. I'm not sure how one defines "regular
ingredients" in the context of this product, which is a mixture
of a bunch of things intended to achieve a nutritional ideal.

I guess #270 is close enough. Specifically, it's a Zone Bar.
They're marketed by Barry Sears' EisoTech company. Sears is
the author of the popular "Zone diet" books, and the bars
contain the 40/30/30 calorie percentage of carbohydrate,
protein, and fat that Sears claims is best for most people.

The i's have it.
i
response 273 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 02:31 UTC 1998

Serving size:  1/4 cup
90 calories
Fat:  45 calories / 5g, 8% / saturated 1g, 6% / cholesterol 40mg, 13%
Sodium:  270mg, 11%
Carbohydrates:  all 0's
Protein:  12g
Vitamin A:  0%    C:  0%    Calcium:  10%   Iron:  2% 

Gurus will *please* try to restrain themselves this time!   :) 
remmers
response 274 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 10:44 UTC 1998

<remmers looks around, trying to spot gurus>
i
response 275 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 01:39 UTC 1998

<i hands remmers a mirror>
lilmo
response 276 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 01:55 UTC 1998

Re #272:  I think that the correct answer would have been that they were in
the ingredients.  Either that, or "no."  :-)

Re #273:  Well, we have cholesterol, so it's from an animal, we have fat,
protein, and calcium, but no starch or sugar (or fiber).  Except for the lack
of sugars, I'd be inclined to guess milk.  In fact, I'll go out on a limb,
and guess, MILK!
keesan
response 277 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 13:10 UTC 1998

Lactose in milk is a carbohydrate and a sugar.
valerie
response 278 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 13:51 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 279 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 18:13 UTC 1998

1/4 cup equals 2 oz, not a bad serving size for cheese.
i
response 280 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 12 01:03 UTC 1998

<chortle>
It's not milk.
lilmo
response 281 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 13 23:43 UTC 1998

Well, I said that I didn't think so, but I figured that I didn't lose
anything by guessing.

Is it human-food?
remmers
response 282 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 14 00:25 UTC 1998

The ratio of protein to fat, and the total absence of carbohydrate,
suggests some kind of meat, or maybe egg, product, one that's not
excessively high in fat. But Valerie's right, meat isn't usually
measured in cups or fractions thereof. So I dunno...
i
response 283 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 14 03:47 UTC 1998

Yes, this food is commonly sold for human consumption.  :)
lilmo
response 284 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 15 23:45 UTC 1998

Is is egg white?
keesan
response 285 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 00:39 UTC 1998

egg replacer?
i
response 286 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 02:32 UTC 1998

This is neither egg white nor egg replacer.
valerie
response 287 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 14:18 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

i
response 288 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 22:48 UTC 1998

Total Fat 5g    8%
Saturated Fat 1g        6%
Cholesterol 40mg        13%
 - is how it's laid out on the actual label.  (Anyone else find my
squeeze-it-in style too cryptic?)

Nope, not cocoa mix.  1 T of plain cocoa contains 3g carbohydrates - 2 of
'em fiber.  None o' neither in this stuff.

Keep guessing!  <chortle>
i
response 289 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 20 18:03 UTC 1998

It seems hard to believe that i've actually stumped a bunch of 
red-blooded American cooks with this traditional, mainstream
food......
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   240-264   265-289   290-314   315-339   340-364   365-389   390-414   415-439 
 440-464   465-489   490-514   515-539   540-564   565-589   590-610    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss