|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 51 responses total. |
jmsaul
|
|
response 26 of 51:
| 
May 5 16:00 UTC 2002 |
Re #24: This is going to sound nastier than I mean it, but I'm not sure
adults who wear diapers should be taking shots at other people's
sexual fetishes.
|
oval
|
|
response 27 of 51:
|
May 5 21:29 UTC 2002 |
..and how hypocritical given how romaannnnnntic diapers are!
|
vidar
|
|
response 28 of 51:
|
May 6 01:25 UTC 2002 |
resp 26: Actually, it's mostly a gripe I had from being a fan of
Farscape (and sometimes looking at Sci Fi's Farscape Message Board). I
had difficulty continuing to watch the show after the body switching
episode and another with Jothee and Chianna. Waaayy too many people
there were obsessed with a relationship of 2 of the main characters -
reading their posts made me physically sick. Besides, I knew someone
would respond to my post here in a semi-negative way. :-p
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 29 of 51:
|
May 6 03:48 UTC 2002 |
Hey, I'm not into slash fiction either, or diapers, for that matter. (Forced
to make a choice, I'd go for slash, but that's just me.)
|
jazz
|
|
response 30 of 51:
|
May 6 04:08 UTC 2002 |
It's not as bad if someone takes a picture of you reading poorly
written erotic fan fiction.
I just don't understand fan fiction. It doesn't bother me. It's just
wish fulfilment fantasy set in someone else's fantasy world, and no more
derivative than Arthurian fantasy, if less snooty. If it was well-written,
I guess I'd read it; I just haven't found any that is.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 31 of 51:
|
May 6 04:40 UTC 2002 |
I don't think I'd be interested in well-written Starsky and Hutch slash
fiction, even.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 32 of 51:
|
May 6 05:38 UTC 2002 |
What's wrong with Starsky and Hutch gettin' it on?
|
phenix
|
|
response 33 of 51:
|
May 6 13:23 UTC 2002 |
ugh
that's as bad as vadar and the light saber
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 34 of 51:
|
May 6 13:36 UTC 2002 |
Re #32: Nothing, as long as they're both consenting. I'm just not into
reading about it.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 35 of 51:
|
May 6 16:25 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
vidar
|
|
response 36 of 51:
|
May 6 16:32 UTC 2002 |
resp 27: lol.
|
phenix
|
|
response 37 of 51:
|
May 6 17:19 UTC 2002 |
re 35: bad 70's psudocop drazma
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 38 of 51:
|
May 6 18:07 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
lelande
|
|
response 39 of 51:
|
May 6 19:36 UTC 2002 |
not that i possess the collector-mentality, but now one thing i'm dying to
get my hands on is a picture of joe saul reading slash porn in a diaper.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 40 of 51:
|
May 6 19:41 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 41 of 51:
|
May 6 19:52 UTC 2002 |
Wow. Well, I guess I'd be a hypocrite if I criticized your kinks, lelande.
|
phenix
|
|
response 42 of 51:
|
May 6 23:37 UTC 2002 |
no. no it's not interesting
oi
RED!
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 43 of 51:
|
May 7 03:59 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
jazz
|
|
response 44 of 51:
|
May 7 18:25 UTC 2002 |
I'M NEVER GOING TO GET THOSE MOMENTS BACK. THANKS FOR THE VISUAL.
Ugh.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 45 of 51:
|
May 7 21:02 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
phenix
|
|
response 46 of 51:
|
May 7 22:24 UTC 2002 |
i tried a safeword:)
|
lelande
|
|
response 47 of 51:
|
May 14 09:35 UTC 2002 |
you safe word, you eat it
|
phenix
|
|
response 48 of 51:
|
May 14 18:18 UTC 2002 |
eat what. and that's not exactly an ssc sentiment
|
lelande
|
|
response 49 of 51:
|
May 16 00:44 UTC 2002 |
it's a safeword diet, smurfy.
|
phenix
|
|
response 50 of 51:
|
May 16 03:26 UTC 2002 |
right.
|