You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   1-25   26-38        
 
Author Message
13 new of 38 responses total.
naftee
response 26 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 06:05 UTC 2004

The last time someone tried to explain and help you out, jep, you brutally
censored them.  You should be thankful tod is putting out an arm and a leg
to talk to you these days.
jep
response 27 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 14:30 UTC 2004

I like Todd.  He is one of the kindest people I've met on Grex, and is 
genuinely interested in helping other people.  He's intelligent, and 
knowledgeable about a lot of different things.  Some of his ideas could 
benefit Grex a great deal.  I don't believe he'll follow through on 
them or keep up his commitment to Grex for very long, but that doesn't 
mean he's a bad person or that one shouldn't admire his many good 
qualities.

It's too bad that, in order to note any characteristic about a person 
which is not glowingly positive, that you can be perceived as hating 
them or as saying they are a worthless human being.  I think Todd is a 
great guy.  I just don't think he should win a Board seat.
other
response 28 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 15:51 UTC 2004

I think that a seat on the board might very well encourage Todd to do
more.  The board race is neither a popularity contest nor a reward for
past deeds, and the responsibilities of a general board member on Grex
are not terrible huge.  Why not take a chance?  What's the worst that
could result?
twenex
response 29 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 18:22 UTC 2004

Todd has already indicated that he thinks a seat on Grex's board is worth more
than a seat on Arbornet's. That should encourage him to contribute more to
Grex than he has to M-Net.
cross
response 30 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 03:25 UTC 2004

Regarding #27; Don't be hatin'.
russ
response 31 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 03:30 UTC 2004

To be an asset to Grex requires a willingness to both make policy and
abide by it, as well as an urge to seek the truth.  Todd's actions
(consistent over months) betray contempt for policy, and I see little
will to confront the truth here.
dpc
response 32 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 14:47 UTC 2004

Yes, I think it would be a good idea to contact past members and
ask how come they are no longer members.
naftee
response 33 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 22:26 UTC 2004

So is _that_ the real reason behind the ID policy?  Collection of information
for use as a harassment tool if one doesn't contribute money?
albaugh
response 34 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 23:58 UTC 2004

Your stupidity is astounding.
naftee
response 35 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 01:22 UTC 2004

Your tactics for getting me to contribute money so you can harass me are
pathetic.
mfp
response 36 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 03:22 UTC 2004

Don't let them get you down.
naftee
response 37 of 38: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 04:41 UTC 2004

Follow the eternal optimist!
jesuit
response 38 of 38: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:15 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   1-25   26-38        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss