You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   1-25   26-34        
 
Author Message
9 new of 34 responses total.
bru
response 26 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 13:12 UTC 2006

probably.  But we have a 300 year supply of coal if we need to use it.
keesan
response 27 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 13:39 UTC 2006

Solar electricity is much cleaner than coal-generated and does not contribute
to global warming.  It might even be cheaper to generate.
nharmon
response 28 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 14:02 UTC 2006

Actually keesan, the development of a room-temperature superconductor
would allow us to transport solar electricity generated in the tropics
all across the world. But as it is now, wire resistance is too much for
continental power transmission.

My brother in law was telling me that he read about a transparent solar
panel being developed that they are going to begin putting on
skyscrapers as windows. It won't totally power the building, but it will
offset its power consumption, and maybe even sell energy back on the
weekends.
keesan
response 29 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 14:07 UTC 2006

You can even get some solar gain on the north side of buildings.  Vertical
solar panels work best in the winter, and buildings with air conditioning need
more electricity in the summer.  There are also direct solar-powered air
conditioners that can go on the rooftop and operate with sun's heat instead
of electricity or gas for heating up the freon in them.  
nharmon
response 30 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 14:31 UTC 2006

An air conditioner doesn't head up freon; it compresses it, runs it
through a heat sink outside, and then allows it to expand in a heat
exchanger inside the house. Its essentially a heat pump, pumping heat
out of the house.

A solar-powered air conditioner would probably use just solar power to
charge a battery which is then used to run the capacitor. Its a mighty
fine idea because the compressor is running all of the time. So the
cummulative charge from the solar panels is enough energy to run the
compressor for 4 or 5 minutes.

Solar power is going to be very important to the energy needs of certain
geographical areas. More areas will benefit as the technology improves.
keesan
response 31 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 19:41 UTC 2006

Refrigerators and air conditioners use some heat source, I forget how.  There
are gas refrigerators and AC (propane).
rcurl
response 32 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 21:15 UTC 2006

Electric refrigerators and airconditioners use similar but not identical
systems, but do not contain a heat source. Gas refrigerators and A/C use heat
to distill ammonia from water. There is a description at
http://www.answers.com/topic/gas-absorption-refrigerator.
tod
response 33 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 22:14 UTC 2006

re #22
Thats pretty cool.  I don't imagine it would work so well in Seattle, though.

My employer is building a "green" building to move us into in 2007.

Here's some tours of green developments
http://www.builtgreen.net/studies/1021.html
gull
response 34 of 34: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:26 UTC 2006

Re resp:0: Interesting theory, but has it been peer-reviewed? 
 
 
Re resp:33: Seattle gets plenty of sun, but it's all during the summer, 
which is also when electrical demand is lowest.  Solar makes a lot more 
sense for somewhere like L.A., where the more the sun shines the more 
everyone cranks up their A/C. 
 
There are simpler things that can help, too.  I remember seeing a 
rather astounding figure for the amount of money that could be saved in 
electrical consumption if everyone in L.A. switched from black roofs to 
white.  Not only would the inside of the buildings remain cooler, the 
air in the city center would actually be cooler as well because of more 
heat being reflected away instead of absorbed. 
 0-24   1-25   26-34        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss