You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-353   354-378   379-384   
 
Author Message
25 new of 384 responses total.
naftee
response 254 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 00:14 UTC 2004

GreX is slower than a peanut-butter river and there are high load_averages.
rational
response 255 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 00:32 UTC 2004

IT"S RUNNLING LIKE MOLASSES!
ryan
response 256 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 00:56 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad
response 257 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 01:41 UTC 2004

IT WASN'T ME SOMEONE LOCKED MY ACCOUNT
I'M INNOCENT WAS'NT EVEN LOGGED ON

!last -2 naftee
albaugh
response 258 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 22:24 UTC 2004

Re: #251: Seeing that, I tried to ftp again from my remote host.  I got just
a little further, but after grex displayed this:

230->>>NO PSYBNC<<<  >>>NO EGGDROP<<<  NO NO NO!!!!!  Won't run here!
230-
230-You must keep file transfers below 100 kilobytes >>>per day<<<.
230-
230-DO NOT BRING THESE FILES TO THIS SERVER:
230-NO eggdrop, NO psybnc or any bouncer, NO IRC servers/clients/bots, NO
emech,
230-NO MUDs, NO mp3s, NO jpegs, NO gifs, NO audio files, NO PTLink, NO BitchX,
230-NO Windows or Linux programs (won't run here - Grex runs SunOS), NO
Unreal,

it "froze" - I had to use Ctrl-C to break out.  Now I'm back to getting the
immediate 421 after login.
salad
response 259 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 00:21 UTC 2004

NO NO NO!!!
gelinas
response 260 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 01:45 UTC 2004

I don't know what the problem is, albaugh; I just tried it with no problem.
salad
response 261 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 02:23 UTC 2004

The problem is, you fuckers stole my account.
rcurl
response 262 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 02:28 UTC 2004

What fraction of incoming e-mail on grex is spam? It must be a very large
fraction, given what I observe on a couple of accounts. Is this a good
utilization of server capacity? 
ryan
response 263 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 02:50 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 264 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 02:54 UTC 2004

Isn't this a concern to Grex staff/board? It would seem that Grex is providing
"service" primarily to spammers rather than to users. I don't see indications
that this bothers anyone very much (unless there is something in coop about
it). 
gelinas
response 265 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 03:06 UTC 2004

Marcus has added anti-spam features to sendmail.  When he gets time, or at
other impetus not clear to me, he looks at the mail forwarded to uce and tries
to "sharpen the teeth" of his spam-filter.

There has been some discussion but, so far as I know, no progress on the mail
system for the new grex machine.
rcurl
response 266 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 03:52 UTC 2004

I was forwarding all of this spam I've been getting to uce, but I saw no
change (well, actually a great increase) in the amount of spam received,
so I quit. It is quite time consuming to forward the spam, and with no
evident improvement, I just delete it now.

If it is really true that 90% of the e-mail received here is spam, I would
suggest some drastic action, like everyone changing their e-mail address,
or do it wholesale by (say) adding "6" to the end of every account. But
then everyone would have to inform their correspondents.... I HATE SPAM.


salad
response 267 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:06 UTC 2004

I h8 u
rational
response 268 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:16 UTC 2004

I h8 fags.
twenex
response 269 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:17 UTC 2004

The feeling is most likely mutual. Or it would be, if cigarettes had feelings.
rational
response 270 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:31 UTC 2004

Do you have terrifically bad reading comprehension, or are you purposely
misinterpreting the fact that "fag" in that context undeniably refers to
homosexuals?
twenex
response 271 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:32 UTC 2004

The latter, obviously.
rational
response 272 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 04:33 UTC 2004

Why would you do that?  It's not very clever?
ryan
response 273 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 13:30 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rational
response 274 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 13:32 UTC 2004

send it 2 uce, newB.
aruba
response 275 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 15:09 UTC 2004

I get around 40 spams a day on Grex, thanks to several of my addresses being
on the web.  I, for one, am pretty annoyed by it, but I don't know what we
can do.  Of course, I don't know how many more I'd be getting without
Marcus's spam filter, but my sense is still that his approach isn't working.
Can we allow users to filter their own spam on the new machine?
katie
response 276 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 15:43 UTC 2004

I get hundreds of spam messages per week. I often delete important
real email by mistake while deleting the spam. It is very irritating.
tod
response 277 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 16:27 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 278 of 384: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 18:09 UTC 2004

Yes, 90+ percent of the e-mail I receive at grex is SPAM.  I haven't yet made
the effort to set up procmail rules to try to filter out the obvious ones...
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-353   354-378   379-384   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss