You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-333      
 
Author Message
25 new of 333 responses total.
nharmon
response 250 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 10:35 UTC 2006

You should've been on /a

Sorry!
keesan
response 251 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 16:13 UTC 2006

Please date messages in the motd, including those about email having been
fixed.
cross
response 252 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 16:39 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 253 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 16:49 UTC 2006

Was it not adopted because of policy, or just neglect? 
cross
response 254 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 22:44 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 255 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 01:43 UTC 2006

That sounds like the handwriting is on the wall, when those in charge are
practicing neglect. 
ball
response 256 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 02:40 UTC 2006

   "Email on Grex has been broken long enough for the
    situation to be considered permanent."

                           http://grex.cyberspace.org/~ball/
scholar
response 257 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 08:47 UTC 2006

Someone might want to help labia out:

labiocom ft 137.204.106.65   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.77   Thu10AM     0 -
pchihao  ft 222.253.76.86    19May06     0 -
mbb      ft p5491B806.dip0.t 20May06     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.115  Thu10AM     0 -
cecep    ft 157.95.31.123     4:18AM     0 RETR kaset_3_b.wav
labiocom ft 137.204.106.81   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.98   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.83   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.62   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.68   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.88   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.54   Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.117  Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.107  Thu10AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.72   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.60   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.106  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.85   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.115  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.67   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.103  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.71   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.86   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.109  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.75   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.100  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.111  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.104  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.73   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.114  Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.87   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.78   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.80   Thu11AM     0 -
labiocom ft 137.204.106.69   Thu11AM     0 -
keesan
response 258 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 15:07 UTC 2006

Could someone please update the motd as regards email problems of last week?
tsty
response 259 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 22:37 UTC 2006

now _this_ really hurts:
  
  
& n
Message 64:
From xxxx@yyyyy.com Sat Jun 03 22:48:00 2006
Envelope-to: tsty@cyberspace.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:48:00 -0400
Reply-To: <xxxxx@yyyyy.com>
From: "another AACS officer" <xxx@yyy.com>
To: "'TS Taylor'" <tsty@cyberspace.org>
Subject: RE: Web site
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 21:46:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C8757.20071F40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <002a01c6865c$dbeaf0$6a1e1e0a@yyyyy>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
Thread-Index: AcaGW62keyTyYLloSxuUxrAUphJwAAMmSQAEcCZiA=
X-ArGoMail-Authenticated: xxxx@yyyyyyyy.com

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C68757.20071F40
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

TS - you have a problem with your email server. It keeps complaining about
too many concurrent SMTP connections. Do you have an account at a more
reliable email host?

  _____


tod
response 260 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 22:44 UTC 2006

jalopy.org
gull
response 261 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 06:38 UTC 2006

Perhaps staff should eliminate the connection delays.  What worked well 
on the medium-sized email server I used to administer may be 
ill-advised for the volume of mail Grex handles. 
vivekm1234
response 262 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 15:19 UTC 2006

Having some problem with my web interface to the BBS. Some articles don't show
up eg: in agora 184, 189, 177 178 and many more. Any idea why? AM i doing
something wrong? I use Firefox 1.5.0.4 on Win2K.
vivekm1234
response 263 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 15:23 UTC 2006

Err ignore #262 Solved..
I needed to check "All items"
Perhaps that could be made more obvious!
tsty
response 264 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 21:06 UTC 2006

 ... but that would remove the thrill of finding NewStuff (tm) every time
you login ... <g>!
davel
response 265 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 21:41 UTC 2006

Re 261 re 259:
I see this all the time - mail to cyberspace.org hangs in the queue for hours
to days, often generating warnings after 4 hours.  If I connect to the SMTP
port, I see that "too many concurrent SMTP connections" message, & an
immediate disconnect.  And I've also gotten complaints about mail to my
Grex address not getting through; & this is much more of a problem for
Grace, who has no other email address.

But is this really a problem with the delay?  It seems to me that the delay
must be really, really, REALLY long if this is the case; when I see the
too-many-connections message the disconnect is *immediate*.  What
is the maximum allowable number of SMTP connections (or processes)
set to?  Can this be bumped up, if it realistically is much too low?

I realize that the limit is set to keep mail from completely busying out the
system.  But that doesn't mean that the default limit (if that's what it
is) is reasonable for Grex.  If the limit is inherited somehow from the
previous hardware, it's even less likely to be reasonable.  (But that seems
a bit unlikely, given that we went from a hacked sendmail to something else
at that time.)
mcnally
response 266 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 00:37 UTC 2006

 Grex's mail config sucks, but I'm afraid I don't know enough about exim
 to fix it.

 The maillog shows we're dropping connections on the floor pretty much
 constantly, but I'm not sure how to fix that.  I have a hypothesis that
 it may be due to our policy of introducing a 30s delay for any host listed
 in one of several RBLs, which I think causes a lot of tied up exim processes,
 but my attempts to reduce that delay to 1s by tweaking the exim.conf file
 have probably not been successful.
keesan
response 267 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 01:50 UTC 2006

Several people report that they can never send me mail, including from
mindspring/earthlink, which is impatient so it always times out.  
ball
response 268 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 04:20 UTC 2006

Re #267: That's what prompted me to post what I did on my
  Web site.  It's pointless people trying to send me email
  on Grex unless they happen to be another local user here.
rcurl
response 269 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 15:42 UTC 2006

I see what people mean about a problem with e-mail. I had sent a message here
a few days ago that arrived within minutes, but last night I sent one that
has still not arrived after nearly 12 hours.
keesan
response 270 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 19:40 UTC 2006

ssh did not work just now but telnet does.  Please someone remove the email
not working message from last week (motd).
krj
response 271 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 21:05 UTC 2006

My unscientific observation is that my incoming and outgoing mail
have stopped working for approximately the last 24 hours.
 
I realize that some of this is still my fault for not having moved
to a modern mail platform.
rcurl
response 272 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 22:45 UTC 2006

I have received some mail dated today, but not what I sent yesterday. Has it
gone into a black hole?
keesan
response 273 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 8 23:34 UTC 2006

I got three mails from AOL today (they have fixed the problem of refusing to
accept mails from us too).
keesan
response 274 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 9 02:06 UTC 2006

sdf.lonestar.org is working now, but freeshell.org is not, and the disk quotas
all set themselves to 0 (with 400MB free) and I had to 'tweak' them - I
wonder what people do who have not paid for the use of 'tweak'.  I posted this
info for people who signed up at freeshell.org for more reliable email than
grex, which has been astonishingly reliable recently.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-333      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss