|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 1037 responses total. |
blaise
|
|
response 250 of 1037:
| 
May 4 19:16 UTC 2001 |
OK, I have a new word which is not
faerie 0 (lastword)
|
kentn
|
|
response 251 of 1037:
|
May 4 22:17 UTC 2001 |
uneasy
|
gelinas
|
|
response 252 of 1037:
|
May 5 00:12 UTC 2001 |
wander
|
aruba
|
|
response 253 of 1037:
|
May 5 03:30 UTC 2001 |
teepee
|
blaise
|
|
response 254 of 1037:
|
May 5 14:35 UTC 2001 |
uneasy 0 (kentn)
wander 0 (gelinas)
teepee 0 (aruba)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 255 of 1037:
|
May 6 04:02 UTC 2001 |
vanity
|
blaise
|
|
response 256 of 1037:
|
May 6 14:31 UTC 2001 |
vanity 1 (gelinas)
|
kentn
|
|
response 257 of 1037:
|
May 6 15:17 UTC 2001 |
action
|
aruba
|
|
response 258 of 1037:
|
May 6 23:55 UTC 2001 |
easels
|
blaise
|
|
response 259 of 1037:
|
May 7 14:29 UTC 2001 |
action 1 (kentn)
easels 0 (aruba)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 260 of 1037:
|
May 7 19:16 UTC 2001 |
angers
|
blaise
|
|
response 261 of 1037:
|
May 7 20:43 UTC 2001 |
angers 0 (gelinas)
|
kentn
|
|
response 262 of 1037:
|
May 8 01:54 UTC 2001 |
jovial
|
aruba
|
|
response 263 of 1037:
|
May 8 02:08 UTC 2001 |
vacate
|
blaise
|
|
response 264 of 1037:
|
May 8 02:19 UTC 2001 |
jovial 3 (kentn)
vacate 0 (aruba)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 265 of 1037:
|
May 8 03:02 UTC 2001 |
joyous
|
blaise
|
|
response 266 of 1037:
|
May 8 03:03 UTC 2001 |
joyous 1 (gelinas)
|
kentn
|
|
response 267 of 1037:
|
May 8 11:09 UTC 2001 |
moving
|
blaise
|
|
response 268 of 1037:
|
May 8 12:17 UTC 2001 |
moving 2 (kentn)
|
aruba
|
|
response 269 of 1037:
|
May 8 13:33 UTC 2001 |
zodiac
|
blaise
|
|
response 270 of 1037:
|
May 8 14:52 UTC 2001 |
Congrats!
zodiac 6 (aruba)
|
aruba
|
|
response 271 of 1037:
|
May 8 19:53 UTC 2001 |
Doh! Ok, I'll try to think of a word.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 272 of 1037:
|
May 9 04:58 UTC 2001 |
Zodiac has been used before (for whatever that's worth - though it is
very rare). See ~rcurl/l.m.words
|
blaise
|
|
response 273 of 1037:
|
May 9 16:06 UTC 2001 |
I hadn't realized that we were supposed to avoid repeating words (and that
there was a source to check against).
|
rcurl
|
|
response 274 of 1037:
|
May 9 16:28 UTC 2001 |
That's why it gets mentioned now and then. However there is no rule
in the game against repeating words.....just wanted to mention that
it was a repeat, for discussion purpose. So far, though, no one has
used the previous word.
|