You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-69        
 
Author Message
25 new of 69 responses total.
beeswing
response 25 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 08:09 UTC 1995

We are all entitled to our opinions... but the fact is a man has passed away,
and it would be nice to see some respect for the dead here (no pun intended,
really). I truly do like the Dead's music, and I resent the pseudo-hippies
who stick Dead stickers on their cars and wear the tie-dye, but never really
listened to the Dead and don't have one damn clue about the Sixties and what
happened back then. I was born in 1972, so of course I don't recall that era
either. I really do enjoy the music of those days though... I just don't want
to put on this fake persona of having been there.
rogue
response 26 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 15:03 UTC 1995

I'm not mocking his death of anything, Trisha. I am simply stating that thos
people who are acting as if it were the day that music died are 
over-reacting because the Dead's influence on music is not significant. 
steve
response 27 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 17:26 UTC 1995

   Well, I think you're mostly right Jemmie, but that is becuase they
didn't "go commercial" in the usual sense and try to plaster themsevles
everywhere like other rock groups.  That in and of itself was rather
unusual.  But I think they did pave the way for other groups to make
music that wasn't excessively head-banging.  So no, they didn't have
that much impact on the music world, but it was by choice I think.
I really respect them for that.
beeswing
response 28 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 17:48 UTC 1995

I actually hate that day-the-music-died "American Pie" song. But I digress.
For those of us who truly like the Dead's music, it's pretty depressing. They
may not have had as big an influence because they were really not played on
the radio. All I've heard on mainstream radio is "Truckin", "Uncle John's
Band", and "Touch of Grey". Touch of Grey was their only top-40 hit. But how
many bands have such a loyal following, despite that lack of airplay? That's
got to tell you something.
rogue
response 29 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:49 UTC 1995

#27: Let's not glorify commercial mediocrity, Steve. Maybe they didn't 
     "go commercial" because their music was not that good and didn't appeal
     to many people? How does one "choose" to not have their music impact
     the music world and the next generation of artists? One writes
     uncompelling music and then says, "Hey, let's hope this doesn't 
     influence too many future artists!" You respect them for creating
     possibly mediocre music which did not influence future artists? 

#28: Yeah, it might simply tell you deadheads have nothing better to do
     during the summer than follow the Dead around the country. 

I hate to be an asshole (actually, I like being one but let's leave that 
for another time) but let's just say that Jerry Garcia was a nice guy who
took lots of drugs and played lots of concerts. Let's not say that he and
the Dead were musically influential or that music will have an unfillable
void. It is probably safe to say that Kurt Cobain and Nirvana had more
influence on music in five years than the Dead did in thirty years. 
carson
response 30 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:58 UTC 1995

maybe socially influential, regardless of how limited?
bruin
response 31 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 01:36 UTC 1995

RE The fact that _Touch of Grey_ was the Grateful Dead's only top-40 hit. 
Another point of reference is that Jimi Hendrix also had only one top-40 hit,
_All Along The Watchtower_, and that song was a Bob Dylan composition.  And
Frank Zappa also had only one top-40 hit (_Valley Girl_ with his daughter
Moon, now seen on "The New VH-1").  However, calling any of the above "one
hit wonders" cound be tantamount to blasphemy to many classic rock buffs.
popcorn
response 32 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 03:52 UTC 1995

This response has been erased.

omni
response 33 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 05:40 UTC 1995

  That IS Touch of Grey, Valerie. I was thrown by it at first, but
you have to listen to it closely.
bruin
response 34 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 11:38 UTC 1995

I do remeber seeing the video for _Touch of Grey_, where the members of the
band were singing skeletons, and towards the middle of the number, the
skeletons transformed into the real Dead members.
robh
response 35 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 12:09 UTC 1995

Oh dear, sweep up the stars and lock up the wood, I'm actually
agreeing with rogue about something...  >8)  (Re the Dead's
influence on music vs. Nirvana's)

Of course, I still think the commercial success of any pop
music group has as much to do with their publicist as with
their music.
beeswing
response 36 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 14:51 UTC 1995

Paula Abdul's videos made her famous, not her music. As for the Dead's
influence, I don't care anymore. They are an entity unto themselves.
orinoco
response 37 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 15:07 UTC 1995

I've listened to some of the dead's stuff, and, quite frankly, I don't see what
the big deal is!  I found it very bland undistinguished music.  THis is not a
case of "kids these days can't accept good music"...I LOVE so called ' oldies',
as well as almost any other kind of music, but the Dead are just BAD!  I know
this is kind of a sensitive topic to bring up now, and sorry if I've offended
anyone, just wondering if there is some secret hidden cache of good dead music
that I can't get at or something...
wjw
response 38 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 15:57 UTC 1995

re 21:
regarding the "quality" vs. the "quantity" of life--I would *not* describe
the life of a drug user in and out of rehab as a "quality" life.  If you do, 
you've bought into the myth of the drug culture.  These people are on the 
bottom rung of society.  The dregs.
beeswing
response 39 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 16:14 UTC 1995

I know of quite a few people wo were on that so-called bottom rung. Thankfully
most of them have gotten out of drugs, because they realized they were killing
themselves. And I don't think anyone smokes that first joint or does that
first line of coke with the sole intention of becoming an addict. You know
what the really bottom rung is? Rapists, murderers, and abusers. And I
certianly didn't find any of those among deadheads. Those "dregs" were very
friendly people, and while I saw one smoking a joint, no one offered me drugs
and I don't think they would have thought anything if I had refused an offer.
I agree Jerry did not live a quality life, but he did live *quite* a life.
wjw
response 40 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 17:06 UTC 1995

The point is, the rock-star drug-culture life is packaged to look good.  People
would think twice if they showed Jimi Hendrix gagging on his own vomit on MTV.
It's a cruel hoax being presented to young people.  As one who was almost
snagged, and now as a parent of teen agers, I think the dark other side should
be given equal time.
orwell
response 41 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 22:41 UTC 1995

Yeah, just to clarify something/.
Jimi Hendrix's albums got high in the charts both in the UK and US during
his career.

DRugs dont enhance the quality of life, either.
DRugs are an escape from reality. They dont broaden horizons, they limit.

I belieive that if someone truly loved life, drugs would be 
unneccesary. Reality should enuff of a "high" for an entire lifetime.
krj
response 42 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 22:58 UTC 1995

There was a joke sometime back that when archeologists sift through 
the wreckage of our culture, they'll conclude that the Grateful Dead
were the most significant musicians of the era, because there are more 
different Grateful Dead recordings in the rubble than there are 
recordings of anyone else.
 
I don't know how Rogue measures "influence on music."  
The Beatles, for example, were tremendous influences on the *marketing*
of music, and on the culture, but which musicians today were 
show a significant influence from Beatles?  Few if any.
The Beatles' overlooked contemporaries The Velvet Underground 
were vastly more significant for the musicians who followed; just 
about all of "college/alternative" rock derives from the Velvets 
and the Byrds.
 
The Dead's work isn't all that far from folk music.  Most of 
Jerry Garcia's non-Dead projects were even more explicitly folk work.
beeswing
response 43 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 23:27 UTC 1995

I think Jerry's dying does expose drugs' consequences. And Jimi's . And
Janis's. I've never done drugs and don't have the desire to. And drug use is
sadly glamorized, but the "just Say No" campaign and drug war have not worked.
When I was in high school, there were always speakers with the "Just don't
use drugs, kids!" Speeches. Some of my friends experimented with drugs, saw
that it was highly overrated, and left them alone after that. Some of the
anti-drug posters in school were hilarious... "No! I am going to a rap concert
with my friends! My parents won't let me use drugs!" Pshaw.
krj
response 44 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 23:30 UTC 1995

I see rogue makes some reference to "commercial mediocrity" up around 
response #29.  Heh.  For the last 10-15 years or so, the Dead have 
consistently ranked near the top in terms of money raked in from 
live touring.  Most of this was done without record company
promotional support -- for much of this period, the Dead didn't have a 
major label contract, but they could still reliably fill stadiums.
 
In recent years the Dead have started issuing their own CDs  out 
of their extensive catalog of recorded shows.  So they get much 
more of the sales price this way...
kerouac
response 45 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 15 22:39 UTC 1995

  Where as most bands make a point of banning video cameras at concerts,
the Grateful Dead not only didnt ban them, they set a special roped off
area near the stage at all their shows where fans could make good
quality tapes of their shows.  A truly cool non-commercial attitude.
The Dead were one of a kind!
kerouac
response 46 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 15 22:54 UTC 1995

 
   For more about the Dead, check out Usenet's Rec.music.Gdead conf...
in the last few days, there have been close to 10,000 messages posted!
rogue
response 47 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 16 01:56 UTC 1995

#37: I'm a great oldies fan. I have practically all of The Beatles music,
     . I have Zepplin's 10 CD set. I have The Who, Hendrix, Eagles, 
     CCR, etc. I have listened to some of the Dead's music and, musically,
     it does not compare to any of those I have just listed. 

#40: Who gives a shit if Hendrix gags on his own vomit? His music was/is
     awesome and he was a great guitarist. 

#42: I think many musicians since The Beatles have been influenced, explicitly
     or not. The Beatles have at least 10 songs which will live as long as
     rock lives. The Dead have zero. I'm not sure how you can mention The
     Dead and The Beatles in the same sentence when talking about music. 

#44: I didn't make a judgement about The Dead's commercial success. I was
     responding to steve's conclusions. Take a downer, krj.

steve
response 48 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 16 03:14 UTC 1995

   Hmmm.  Thats an interesting thought, that the Dead have zero
songs that will be remembered while the Beatles have 10.  ...I
wonder if that will hold true, in due time?
   The Dead didn't make the headlines that the Beatles did,
thats for certain.  But they've been attracting ever greater
numbers of fans over the decades, and seem to keep them once they
got 'em.  I'm not sure there is another group anywhere that can
say that.
   Given their increasing popularity, and the fact that after a
pop star dies they often increase in stature/popularity, I really
do wonder what will happen to the Dead.
popcorn
response 49 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 16 11:26 UTC 1995

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-69        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss