|
Grex > Femme > #135: latest news, scandals and more |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 59 responses total. |
loperbd
|
|
response 25 of 59:
| 
Apr 23 02:01 UTC 2002 |
I will soon ask to delete this whole thread. I got complements of the
staff and called asocial by Lynne, what a nice people, why not being
friendly, yes social, warm, is that so difficult
|
loperbd
|
|
response 26 of 59:
|
Apr 23 02:38 UTC 2002 |
There are very nice alternatives for gluten and do realy like them,
with those ungly muddy shapes.
In my country you've patients clubs for a lot of things and for gluten
intolerance as well. If you have the money for it it can be a joy to
eat other food.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 27 of 59:
|
Apr 23 02:44 UTC 2002 |
If you have a thread and you don't like my illegible postings in it,
please write a message here, so I know that I can delete it.
|
glenda
|
|
response 28 of 59:
|
Apr 23 02:59 UTC 2002 |
Please don't delete what you have already posted. Everytime you delete one
of your responses it makes the item register as having a new response but all
that shows up is the subject line. It gets very annoying after a while. And
it is rude to keep deleting responses that others have read and responded to.
People coming along later see the response, wonders what it refers to, goes
to look for the referenced response and finds nothing (unless they know how
to read the censored log).
|
loperbd
|
|
response 29 of 59:
|
Apr 23 11:56 UTC 2002 |
I understand you, Glenda, it good that you tell me this.
But, my postings were mainly for a vital goal, far more important than
any other, I think. I was obliged to delete them. Glenda, the
situations changed sometimes very rapidly. One email could make posting
not only obsolete but hurting, and that's very bad. Please don't read
the censored log.
Each time you see postings you don't like, such as about my L'F'
relationship, hampers my way of giving. I don't want to press, I want
to share, I want to communicate in a friendly way.
Many deleted items are just versions that with the backspace got some
improvements, the normal way didn't succeed.
And it's true I feel me not everywhere welcome.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 30 of 59:
|
Apr 23 13:27 UTC 2002 |
I like the word gluten, it's a Duch common plural -en, like some words
in English, children.
I have a girl with salame spasms, and if we knew more and had recognized
those typical loss of tension, falling with a shock forward with supple
arms, she wouldn't fall back to a child with a mental age of 2 months,
then her development maybe could have stayed rather well.
It's very good what you do Valerie, know much, gather much. Very, very
good.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 31 of 59:
|
Apr 23 14:02 UTC 2002 |
/emote has a salami spasm
|
anderyn
|
|
response 32 of 59:
|
Apr 23 15:51 UTC 2002 |
What's a salame spasm? (I assume it's not a salami!)
|
slynne
|
|
response 33 of 59:
|
Apr 23 15:52 UTC 2002 |
/emote pees her pants from laughing so hard at #31
|
loperbd
|
|
response 34 of 59:
|
Apr 23 16:39 UTC 2002 |
Salame spams ir salaam spams is the beginning of the syndrome of West,
to google. It's a very serious metal desease. The nam Salame cramps
comes from the movent salame saleikum. It one of the most dangerous
spams brain deseases.
|
edina
|
|
response 35 of 59:
|
Apr 23 16:57 UTC 2002 |
It really IS a pseudo of lelande.
|
glenda
|
|
response 36 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:04 UTC 2002 |
Except the lelande uses better English and can be understood, even if somewhat
crude.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 37 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:10 UTC 2002 |
But this is almost too garbled to be real (I spend a lot of my days trying
to figure out what people who don't speak English as a first OR a second
language mean when they write what they think is English ... not slamming
them, since they do a lot better than I'd do writing, say, Russian or Chinese,
and definitely they write better mathematics than I'm ever likely to do, but
I think I can say that I have a sense of the patterns that one is likely to
encounter -- and this is like NOTHING I've ever seen before).
|
loperbd
|
|
response 38 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:15 UTC 2002 |
Are you your now feeling happy Edina, you could mail me.
West's sydrome is a standard name It's awful, a beautiful girl but
mentally 2 months. People who see her can't bear it. Till she was six
month I danced with her in my arms and a joyful child, then the salame
cramps came and she degenerated. Now so beautiful and a baby of 2
months. And #32 and #33 just joking. Our dreams broke. And #37
bothering about language.
|
glenda
|
|
response 39 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:27 UTC 2002 |
I deal with foreign students at WCC on a daily basis. I have never seen/heard
anything as garbled as this.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 40 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:32 UTC 2002 |
I know your point already Glenda. I'm a language lover too, but in your
eyes a very poor one. Okay. Please don't react on my posting anymore, I
know your opinion.
|
glenda
|
|
response 41 of 59:
|
Apr 23 17:47 UTC 2002 |
I will react to any posting that I choose to. If you were such a language
lover, you would take the time to use it better.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 42 of 59:
|
Apr 23 18:06 UTC 2002 |
You have the time to post in my threads, I ask you now copy my post,
make a new item, copy it and clean it up. I check the differences and
delte then my original postings. Then we work together and that gives
us both a better feeling than fighting each other.
And please take all my serious meant email serious. If not, I have to
explain unnecessary much. You know that it can backfire.
I know you are a good woman. In this country adoption homes are
screened. Maybe also in your country. I know then you are a very good
mother for her. Please take much care of her.
I once had a posting with marks for abused children, six points of
behavior and medical properties (such as tendency for type II
diabetes). It's very useful for older women so they can check for
themselves instead emailing a strange man, that you say is bad. It's
deleted now. Useful for maybe all members but that info is not for
young girls.
|
edina
|
|
response 43 of 59:
|
Apr 23 18:22 UTC 2002 |
You know what - I *did* e-mail you - you never responded.
|
morwen
|
|
response 44 of 59:
|
Apr 23 18:26 UTC 2002 |
Ed, if the situation changes that necessitated the posting, simply
state that it has changed. That way you don't have to delete
everything and the rest of us aren't left wondering what you didn't
want us to see.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 45 of 59:
|
Apr 23 18:53 UTC 2002 |
#43. I have no email of you received.
I check now. safeandwarm@hotmail.com has no email of you in the in box.
Julie used the same address with no problem. Please, Edina, don't look
at what others post who don't really know about what you feel, try to
email me again. I will always answer you. If good you'll get another
more private email address.
#44, but it can be hurting Julie, probably not for you but for others
certainly. No reminding of particular news is for not all readers good.
My former lover would make immediately a clash. Timing, not again were
her holy words. Not again and not this time that are notions I have to
use carefully.
|
morwen
|
|
response 46 of 59:
|
Apr 23 19:45 UTC 2002 |
Um. Ed, I can speak for myself, thanks.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 47 of 59:
|
Apr 23 20:32 UTC 2002 |
Yes, Julie I know that, and you thanks as well!
|
loperbd
|
|
response 48 of 59:
|
Apr 23 23:08 UTC 2002 |
Julie, I can't find anymore your nasty posting that I've not a good
contact with the feelings of women. While I simple can proof I have
what I say. You all have not seen that someone who is happy can accept
many things also not nice ones, while a not happy one total other
priorities can have, and that's very true.
And your reaction is true for yourself, but you are not the only woman.
|
loperbd
|
|
response 49 of 59:
|
Apr 24 10:25 UTC 2002 |
I refound it in a FORGOTTEN thread, completely obsolete, look at the
title, meant not to exist anymore! And in any case frozen before
commenting. Think how I feel me now.
Let it be clear deleting is only for this subject valuable, because
this subject is so sensitive, so special connected to people. It's a
truly vulnerable subject with serious aspects of privacy. No one tells
openly about those things.
You didn't like deleting, but see what happened now. I needed to post
it here to reach the people for whom it was, so they themself could
decide. It's completely true talking further can only in the safety of
a private connection.
After this exchange of words, please just talk friendly again, that's
much and much better.
This is a kind of clash, with very common elements. I've seen it many
times happen and far less the opposite: The woman has grown with her
children and the man has stayed the same. She can grow with her
opinions, he thinks she is still the same, but she has moved. A part of
this is she has more to the point information.
If communicating then succeeds you often see a kind of clash. But a
beautiful thing is you can come together again, if only you don't give
up. And the simple solution is communicate much. Ask much, listen well,
be a little patient, give room to breathe, a bit warmth, that helps
always, I think. Don't you think?
It's giving a much safer feeling we all need.
I hope many of you will believe my defense. I don't expect I've
concvinced all. But I've done my best. I thank the people who could
prevent me writing a defense, that I was able to do it. I hope you can
play the ball, and some know what I'm doing with my English.
|