|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 98 responses total. |
robh
|
|
response 25 of 98:
|
Jul 4 08:12 UTC 1996 |
That could be a problem, as Grex has no owner. >8) Would a member
of the Board of Directors be sufficient?
|
scott
|
|
response 26 of 98:
|
Jul 4 11:56 UTC 1996 |
To expand on robh just there...
Grex is run by a corporation, Cyberspace Communications, Inc. That is to be
non-profit. If we had an owner, we couldn't be non-profit. So instead, Grex
has a Board of Directors, with seven members. There are three officers:
President, Treasurer, and Secretary.
As President, I would have no objection to signing such as receipt.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 27 of 98:
|
Jul 4 12:47 UTC 1996 |
If there are any circumstances in which this information will
not be kept confidential it would be a good idea to include that
in the note. And there are circumstances which would require
Grex to give up this information, some known and some unknown.
Please be careful what you promise in Grex's name.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 28 of 98:
|
Jul 4 19:11 UTC 1996 |
Has Grex ever adopted a policy on member info confidentiality? It isn't
easy to search the board records as a compilation of adopted policies
has not been created. It would be easy to adopt one that conforms to
current practices, which could be cited to answer inquiries like these.
|
danr
|
|
response 29 of 98:
|
Jul 4 22:19 UTC 1996 |
Mary has a point. We can't guarantee that we will never give out that
information. Indeed, we may be legally required to do so. For example, if
we were someone were to dispute the results of an election, we may have to
surrender the membership list.
I do, however, think that we could guarantee that we will not divulge the
information, except when legally required to do so.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 30 of 98:
|
Jul 5 00:35 UTC 1996 |
So we tell the Secret Service we won't cooperate in their investigation
without a warrant and they come back with all the proper paperwork and
take the hardware with them. Quid Pro Quo.
I can think of so many weird scenarios where our promise might get broken
that I think making a promise would be a bad idea. Maybe Grex should
instead continue to boast that we understand how privacy is important to
our users and the Board and staff will do what they can to facilitate
confidentiality. But such a thing is impossible to guarantee in light of
security issues and other situations beyond Grex's control. That would
be an honest statement and a realistic goal.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 31 of 98:
|
Jul 5 07:39 UTC 1996 |
A *promise* isn't necessary. If Grex wants to address the issue, it should
adopt a *policy*, and that policy has to include release of the
information if required by law, or in the event of violation of net
conditions of use. I can't think of any other circumstances that would
require the use of user information without the necessary assent of the
user.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 32 of 98:
|
Jul 5 14:00 UTC 1996 |
Would staff have access to the treasurer's information?
|
kain
|
|
response 33 of 98:
|
Jul 5 15:50 UTC 1996 |
while we're at advertising for memberships howbout this
We do something like gift certificates only with memberships. We could have
a contest for who could design the best certificate. The winner <decided by
a vote of some kind would get maybe a free membership for a month. The
certificate should have the dial in number, the telnet adress, and all the
benifits you get on it. People would buy these certificates to give to other
friends, etc as gifts for their birthday, christmas, chanakuh <I know I
probably spelled that wrong> mothers day, fathers day, whatever. It'd be a
good way to sell a lot more memberships. Then once people have tried it and
if they like it it'd incourage them to renew their memberships. "gift
memberships" if you will.
|
kain
|
|
response 34 of 98:
|
Jul 5 16:01 UTC 1996 |
and back on topic except for two things that might interfere: I'm going to
be gone july 15-august15. I may not be the best at marketing but I do have
a few ideasone is in #33. I think I could do it with some help from a
commitee. So yes I'd volunteer
|
aruba
|
|
response 35 of 98:
|
Jul 5 17:40 UTC 1996 |
I think the idea of gift memberships is a good one. I don't know about
giving away a month's membership for the winner of the contest; we'd have to
talk about that one. Certainly whover designs the certificate should have
their name printed on it ("Certificate designed by ...").
|
kain
|
|
response 36 of 98:
|
Jul 5 18:28 UTC 1996 |
yes maybe that would be sufficianttoo
|
omni
|
|
response 37 of 98:
|
Jul 6 03:31 UTC 1996 |
I'll toss my hat in the ring. I think I know what Grex needs since I've been
logging into this thing for the last 4 years. I don't have any degree in
marketing, but I can sell things.
|
tsty
|
|
response 38 of 98:
|
Jul 6 06:16 UTC 1996 |
#33 has some interesting ideas, many worth thnkningabout
|
rcurl
|
|
response 39 of 98:
|
Jul 6 07:43 UTC 1996 |
Gift memberships seem to me to be a good idea. "Membership" in Grex
represents a personal committment (though one does not have to *do*
anything), but a "one-month trial certificate" that is also a membership,
will require that the recipient make that committment, in order to
remain a member. The certificate should carry the valid period - and
what to do to continue the membership. In a way, monthly memberships
are not really memberships until they continue for three months (when
the member gains the right to vote), so this would not be giving people
legal membership when they are unaware of it.
|
scott
|
|
response 40 of 98:
|
Jul 6 11:55 UTC 1996 |
At the last board meeting, Mary Remmers pointed out that the $6/$60 is in the
bylaws, making things like discounts a bit tricky.
|
kain
|
|
response 41 of 98:
|
Jul 6 14:53 UTC 1996 |
If they're going to work to attract more members we can probably work
osmething out but I don't really think it'll be necessary. And let omni be
the membership chair. I think I'd probably do much better just on the
commitee. I don't have much experience with these things. Should I post an
item for the creation of the certificate.
#39 that's what I'm saying they get how ever long was payed for and then can
renew it if they really want tom make the commitment hey can renew and choose
to continue
|
wfy
|
|
response 42 of 98:
|
Jul 6 16:15 UTC 1996 |
Can any staff (or Root) answer #32 ? Thank you.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 43 of 98:
|
Jul 6 16:15 UTC 1996 |
Right. I was agreeing with you! Come to think of it, the ideal
certificate might be a two (2) months membership. $12 is a modest but
nice gift ($6 is for cheapskates... 8^>), and a two months membership
does not create a fully franchised member unless the person wishes to
continue on their own.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 44 of 98:
|
Jul 6 16:21 UTC 1996 |
I don't think there is a policy at present. What happens now with
violations of condition of use rules, or with other troublemaking, is
that staff follows up via the user's id and domain - i.e., information
always available. I don't know if staff ever asked the treasurer for
additional id info - though most troublemakers are not members, so it is
unlikely. It could be adopted in a policy that release of personal
information by the treasurer requires board action - that's the most
protection possible in a corporation.
|
kain
|
|
response 45 of 98:
|
Jul 6 17:32 UTC 1996 |
yes sounds good. Howbout the contest for the desing what about this. We
desing them between now and the 5 the year aneversary and vote on them there
or at the next board meeting?
|
arthurp
|
|
response 46 of 98:
|
Jul 6 21:19 UTC 1996 |
The certificate idea is excellent. :) I would have gotten one for Marla way
back when to convince her, but she's already convinced now.
|
srw
|
|
response 47 of 98:
|
Jul 6 21:35 UTC 1996 |
Currently the staff does make use of information that is kept on-line.
Membership information is held by the treasurer and not kept on Grex.
No one, staff or other, has ever asked for this information as far as I know.
The purpose for having it is primarily so that an individual whose membership
was revoked due to misbehavior would not be able to recreate the membership.
Actually no member has ever done anything that would result in revocation of
membership. Using Grex for illegal activity, or refusing to comply with
requests not to abuse the privileges of membership would probably be
sufficient to trigger revocation.
There is no desire to turn membership information over to authorities
under any circumstances, but I would imagine we'd have to do so if ordered
by a court.
|
tsty
|
|
response 48 of 98:
|
Jul 6 21:35 UTC 1996 |
i'd accept a cheapskate gift ....
|
tsty
|
|
response 49 of 98:
|
Jul 6 21:47 UTC 1996 |
#47 slipped in.
andin response thereto; you can't turn over what you never possess.
|