You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-94       
 
Author Message
25 new of 94 responses total.
popcorn
response 25 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 23:53 UTC 1996

It's fine with me to meet at Jan's place, too, especially if he wants an
excuse to clean up.  :)

I've added the meeting time to the motd.
janc
response 26 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 04:23 UTC 1996

Actually, I kind of would like an excuse to clean the place up.  I've got more
chairs than Valerie, but fewer plants, rodents, and puzzle games.  Otherwise
it is pretty much six of one, half-dozen of the other.  Valeries shouldn't
all the time have to host.  I'm near intersection of Plymouth Road and Barton
Drive.
popcorn
response 27 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 15:11 UTC 1996

Ok, then let's meet at your place.
Cool beans!
janc
response 28 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 21 07:24 UTC 1996

Cool.  Basic directions now, more detail later:

   Address:  1031 Barton Rd, Apt #210

This is in Traver Knoll Apartments, right near the intersection of Barton
Drive with Plymouth road.  The apartment complex is on the right immediately
after you turn onto Barton from Plymouth.

Once in the complex, keep left when the road forks.  My apartment is on the
far end of the second building.  Park in any empty space.
janc
response 29 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 22 18:17 UTC 1996

I promised more complete directions, but I think they are really kind of
unnecessary, since it's not all that hard to find.  However, for the sake
of overkill, here's the same info with extra redundancy:

Instructions:
   - Get on Plymouth Rd (it's an exit off US-23 for out of towners).
     I'm not very far from the Broadway Bridge end of the street.
   - Drive until you reach the light at the Barton Dr, which is the only
     light on a long stretch otherwise without lights.
   - Turn onto Barton Dr.
   - First Right into Traver Knoll Apartments
   - Keep left at Y intersection.
   - 1031 Barton is at far end of the second building on right.
   - Park in any empty space.
   - Buzz #210 to get in (my name is on the mailbox, but not the buzzer).
         
Totally unnecessary map:

 --------------     ------------    
                     Traver st.      Far end of second building is
 ---------------   --------------    1031 Barton.  Jan's apt is #210
               | B |                 on second floor.  X marks spot.
               | a |          ____________________________________
               | r |         /  _________________________    ______
               | t |         | | +--------+   +--------+ \  / +---
               | o |         | | |        |   |      X | | |  |   
               | n |         | | +--------+   +--------+ | |  +---
               |   |________/  /                         | |___
               | D  ________  (  Traver Knoll Apartments \_______
               | r |        \  \___
 Ann Arbor     |   |         \_____ wrong way!  Stay left at Y!
 Railroad      |   |                    
 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
               |   |
 ---------------   -------------------------------------------------
                light         Plymouth Rd
 ---   -------------------------------------------------------------
<-- to Broadway Bridge & Downtown      To North Campus & US-23 --->
davel
response 30 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 22 21:09 UTC 1996

show-off!
rickyb
response 31 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 02:00 UTC 1996

        {nice map anyway...sorry I won't be there.}

scg
response 32 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 07:38 UTC 1996

Sorry I missed it.  I over slept.
janc
response 33 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 19:35 UTC 1996

I think Valerie will post full minutes.  But highlights:

 - We were all surprised to find ourselves in good enough shape budgetarily
   to be able to undertake some modest growth.  It looks like we can afford
   to (a) add two more phone lines, (b) get a UPS to put all our equipment
   on, and (c) set up a News machine.

 - We felt that we did not have enough money to upgrade our network connection
   to an ISDN link (even if we didn't do the above stuff), but since this is
   something that would really be good to do, we'd like to do a fund-raiser
   focused on this issue.  First off we're going to have to figure out
   exactly how much it would cost us and how we'd set up the connection.

 - We thought doing an auction as a general fundraiser real-soon-now would
   be good.

 - There are a variety of near zero-cost projects that we'd like to pursue
   now as staff time is no longer soaked up by the sun 4.  These include
   upgrading the modems (which we already raised money for), Setting up a
   mail forwarder, setting up a kerberous server, bringing Backtalk on line,
   switch over to the terminal server, and half-a-dozen other things that
   slip my mind.
janc
response 34 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 19:37 UTC 1996

(Note:  nothing decided in this meeting is official or final.  It's just a
brainstorming session.  Real decisions will be made at Monday's staff
meeting.)
janc
response 35 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 19:38 UTC 1996

Oops.  Monday's *board* meeting.
nestene
response 36 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 19:42 UTC 1996

What's Backtalk?  And why a mail-forwarder?
srw
response 37 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 22:25 UTC 1996

A mail forwarder is just another machine on our subnet that will be able to
accept incoming mail for Grex when Grex can't. When grex is down or
overloaded, it does not accept mail. The forwarder will hold our mail instead
of the sender's machine. This has a number of advantages for us.
Once Grex is able to accept mail again, it can be transferred to Grex very
quickly.  Because of the nature of SMTP mail, this mail-forwarder is a
relatively simple project.

Backtalk is the new name for a brand new web-based conferencing package.
Backtalk was developed by Jan Wolter and I on our own time.
It is compatible (or will be) with Picospan, and capable of using the
existing picospan conferences. It will give a completely different look to
conferencing for those who use it, but have no effect on those who use
picospan, except that there will be more people to talk to.

Backtalk will be made available for Grex to use for free, but it is
not freeware. Backtalk is not quite "beta" yet. We are "alpha" testing it.
steve
response 38 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 00:45 UTC 1996

   Wish I'd been able to be there.  The items I see in #33: a) phone
lines, b) a UPS, c) news machine  are all good things.  a) is teh
easiest, since it just involved getting the modei, configuraing them
and installing them.  b) is harder, in that we need to figure out
1) how much power we're trying to cover for, 2) how long we're going
to go for it.  c), the news machine is defniately the hardest, since
we have to 1) figure out how we're going to get news into the machine
(uucp link, another line to site XXX, etc), 2) how much disk we can
afford to start (whatever we get won't be enough), 3) getting another
4/200 SPARC CPU card so the news machine is the same as Grex, *and*
configuring the hardwarde, software to do this.
   I like the idea of a fund-raiser for ISDN.
   Lots 'o little cost items too, I agree.
srw
response 39 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 01:37 UTC 1996

One part of the meeting would have taken a different turn if you had been
there, STeve. However, we can continue the discussion on-line. I proposed that
we should not use the VME chassis that used to be Grex as a news server. 
I sincerely believe that it will cost us too much in electricity over the next
three years. 

I agree with you that we do not want to proliferate platforms, though.
We currently have 2 (if you don't count the Road-runner, "greedy").
We have the Sun 4/260 which is Grex, and we have the intel platform running
Free-BSD. (gryps).

I proposed that we abondon the idea of using VME architecture for the news
server and instead inmplement that server on  intel hardware. It can be done
for the same or lower up-front $$, and once it is running we figure that we'll
save $25/month in electricity to operate it (at least) which adds up
to $300/year.

No one was there to contradict me, and i do not know what you 
(or greg or marcus or remmers) would have said had any of you been there, 
but I am sincerely interested in knowing whether I made any error in my 
analysis.  I believe we whould permanently shut down the extra VME box.
steve
response 40 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 03:28 UTC 1996

   You might be right.  It's an interesting issue however, and a little
more complicated than it might seem.  There are several things to
consider when figuing out the practicallity of UNIX boxes.

   I'm not sure how good a platform FreeBSD is for running INN.  I
know of a machine that is a news server for a company in Detroit that
runs a late version of INN on FreeBSD 2.0.  They've had continued 
problems with it, and according to them, heard similar experiences
from other people with regard to INN on that platform.  However, and this
is a big however, they aren't really UNIX folk and don't know that much
yet about UNIX, or news administration in general.  So that might not be
at all relevant.  I will say however that activly used systems based
on NetBSD/FreeBSD/Linux/BSDI still aren't quite up to a properly running
SUnOS system (which I now believe we're running, thanks to being on SunOS
4.1.3!).

   The next issue is cost.  Disk dosn't matter much, except that if
we go to an AT box of any sort, we won't have the ability to use
really large IDE disks, because there aren't any.  We can always use
SCSI disks on the theoritical AT news machine, but thats going to
cost us another $150 for a decent SCSI controller.  Over on the Sun-3,
we have a SCSI controller.  RAM is definitely a factor--32M cards for
$200 are still considerably cheaper than $310 for 16M simms.  Of course,
SIMM prices are wildly fluctuating, and 32M cards are likely to be
falling as SIMM prices fall to at least some extent.  Right now we
have 1 32M card in the Sun-3 available for use.  Next cost item is
electricty.  AT boxes absolutely win there, at least on the surface.
An AT box I will assume is going to use 200W, and a lightly loaded
VME chassis at 600W.  It turns out that the Sun-4 uses a little less
power than we'd thought so 600W should prove semi-accurate.

   This means that it takes about 450 watts extra per hour to feed
a VME machine.  Translated to a 720 hour month, thats $35.64 assuming
$0.11/kWH.  Over the course of a year thats about $426 in power
costs.  That might seem like a lot extra, however, unless we get
donations we'll have to buy:

   + a motherboard (say, a 33MHZ 486)   $100
   + SCSI controller                    $200
   + 32M of RAM                         $300
   + stupid VGA card/monitor            $125
   + ethernet card                      $ 40
                                  total $765

   Now, let's go over what would be needed to get a VME chassis
to be a Sun-4/260 for news
   + 4/200 CPU card                     $200
   + 32M RAM                            $000
   + SCSI controller                    $000
   + video display                      $000
   + ethernet card                      $000
                                  total $200

   Remember, I'm not including disks since they'd be the same in
either case.  Nor am I considering connection costs, however we
do that.

   If the power assumptions are high on the Sun-4, and/or low on
the AT box, then the cost savings are going to be smaller and
thus the pay back rate even longer.

   Considering that there are people who question whether Grex
should get news at all, I think the more prudent thing to do
is use a Sun at this point.  Will that always be true, using a
VME box?  Nope.  At some point we'll find that newer Sun stuff
is so cheap we can junk it all.  But not yet.

   Obviously we need to talk about it more.
popcorn
response 41 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 06:25 UTC 1996

Another cost for using the Sun 4 instead of Intel is the cost of dealing with
all the heat the Sun 4 generates -- a definite concern in the summer months.

Jan's summary is very accurate.  I'll post more details when I'm awaker.
srw
response 42 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 06:34 UTC 1996

Actually the figure we were using for the AT box was 100 W., not 200 W.
If accurate that would shorten up the payback period. Somehow I feel better
spending money on hardware we get to keep, rather than spending it on KWH.
It's like buying versus renting, I guess. I get the willies paying Detroit
Edison so much.
ajax
response 43 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 06:40 UTC 1996

  Steve, I think you underpriced SIMMs for the PC, and overpriced
other components a bit.  Currently I think you'd pay $12-$13 per
meg for used SIMMs (generally falling fast though).  Other prices
are for new equipment.  I'm not sure what ethernet cards would be
supported, so that may cost more.
 
  486-40              $70
  32M RAM            $400
  adaptec scsi        $90
  mono monitor/card  free (have 'em)
  ethernet            $25
  -----------------------
  total              $585
 
  Also, for the 4/200 card, unless you're planning on buying a
spare for backup, they're $100, not $200.
 
  Another cost for the Sun 4 besides power and heat removal is
if you want to keep it on a UPS.  An extra 500VA (approx) of power
protection needed might add another $250 (very roughly) to the UPS.
(Those figures are pulled out of a hat; some further analysis would
be helpful).
janc
response 44 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 18:56 UTC 1996

One other note.  If we take the Intel option, we can sell the Sun 3. 
Apparantly not for much, but this is a plus on the Intel side.  So from
the above:

                       Sun        Intel
   Initial Cost:
     Computer:        $100        $585
     UPS?             $250         ---
     Cooling?         $???         ---
     Sell of Sun 3?    ---       -$???

   Annual Overhead:
     Electricity:     $426         ---
     Cooling?         $???         ---

The electricity cost of the Sun may be more of the Intel box is closer to
100W than 200W, as has been suggested.

It looks like even without the UPS, assuming Cooling costs us nothing, and
not selling the Sun 3, an Intel box pays off in just over a year.  In the
long term, it is obvious that we are not going to stay with the Sun 3.  It
just sucks up way too much power.  An Intel box like the one described is
something that has a long term future of being useful in one capacity or
another.  It is a better place to be spending our money.
ajax
response 45 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 21:38 UTC 1996

  Possible point to ponder: for $300 more, the Intel box could be a
586-133 with PCI bus and PCI SCSI card (assuming FreeBSD has drivers
for one of them).

  By the way, are y'all pretty sure 32MB of RAM is enough for the kind
of news server you want to run?  I saw a web page a while back that told
you how to calculate how much you'd generally want for a given number
of articles per day.  I can probably locate it if there's interest.
janc
response 46 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 22:02 UTC 1996

I'm not sure if anyone was including this in our calculations, but we already
have a 486 chip.  We'd just need the motherboard.
steve
response 47 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 22:31 UTC 1996

   Forget selling any of our Sun's: no one is apt to want them.  Or
if we do find someone, it will have to be local, since shippeing
hundreds of miles would cost as much as the unit itself.
   No, I'm not sure that INN will be completly happy in 32M of ram,
but its a start.  Since its been envisioned that the news machine
would do little else other than news however, we might be able to
get away with it.
   I don't think we need a 133Mhz system for this--we need reasonably
fast I/O, not CPU.  Unforunateley, AT's provide fast CPU cheaply: its
their best advantage over other things.  I/O bandwidth isn't that
great.
  Jan, I agree with you that in the longer term, an AT box of
some sort is going to be the way to go.  I do however question
jumping to one now, given the hardware we currently have.  We're
going to need to raise funds somehow for the news machine--we
need all the disk we can get our hands on.
  People are also neglecting to understand that the VME chassis is
simply more rugged.  At least 4 times last year during power
problems I saw gryps, the 386 based router lose its mind when the
Sun-3 merily went along.  Thats part of the underlying reason
I still favor Sun stuff: it was designed for commercial applications,
and shows it in terms of the way its built.  That is something to
remember.
srw
response 48 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 23:03 UTC 1996

We aren't questioning the value of a sun for the main login machine. 
Since it is much cheaper to put a 100W Intel on good power, I'm not sure I
buy  the ruggedness argument. But even if I did, the second year the sun would
cost a lot more than the Intel. Do we want to spend that kind of money just
so  the news server survives power hits. I don't think so. It's very
non-critical. I agree that a faster machine than the 486 DX 33 that we have
should not be needed.
scott
response 49 of 94: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 23:20 UTC 1996

Either way, we're going to spend $$ on disk.  Probably at the same prices,
since we'll want/need SCSI on either a Sun or an Intel box.  I figure that
the Intel is a no-brainer, since we likely won't need to do anything about
heat this summer (Gryps did OK, as a reminder), while if we run a VME box we
will certainly have to do something extra to remove heat.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-94       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss