|
Grex > Coop7 > #140: Does Grex need a new fair-witness for the Poetry conference? |   |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 88 responses total. |
shade
|
|
response 25 of 88:
| 
Dec 26 00:15 UTC 1995 |
Ha. I'll do it if no one else wants to.
Or if someone realy feels like making me do it.
red\garding 23#: Yes linking items has been one of the main
things that's come up over the past couple months, as well as deleting
extraneous (oops I didn't mean to type enter quite yet) items.
And no, at this point, the cf does NOt really need any promotion.
though it has it's lull's over the summer.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 26 of 88:
|
Dec 26 00:18 UTC 1995 |
We have about 5 people who post heavily and, for the most part, have a defined
style. It would be nice to get some new faces in Poetry. A couple days ago,
I put a plug for the Poetry cf in Agora so hopefully that'll atract some new
poets! :)
|
shade
|
|
response 27 of 88:
|
Dec 26 00:41 UTC 1995 |
I doubt it...I try to get individual people to come in. But it's hard, because
there's some many old items it's overwhelming. I remember when I first logged
on there were 110 items and THAT was overwhelming...
And then I know there are people who've posted poems and never came back
to check the responses and even I can't remember how to set it so
your files consider everything old read.
And you have to remember, a godly fraction of the poeple in the world
dislike poetry. Goodly, that was.
But really, this item shouldn't be an arugement about issues. We should get
an active FW to complain to first, ya know?
|
popcorn
|
|
response 28 of 88:
|
Dec 26 01:26 UTC 1995 |
Jenne, I think you'd be a great choice of fair witness for the poetry
conference.
(By the way, the command to make it look like you've read everything in a
conference is "fixseen", or just "fix").
|
shade
|
|
response 29 of 88:
|
Dec 26 04:54 UTC 1995 |
I think some people woudl disagree with you, valerie, but thank you anyway
|
brighn
|
|
response 30 of 88:
|
Dec 26 05:46 UTC 1995 |
Oh, hush, Jenna... :)
There isn't going to be anyone that everyone would agree with,
especially with this conference. Too many clashing egos. Honestly,
it's a minor administrative position! We just need to find someone
who won't delete all of user X's poetry on a snit... :)
And your snits are bad, Jenna, but you wouldn't do that sort of thing.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 31 of 88:
|
Dec 26 05:52 UTC 1995 |
Do you have proof?!? >8)
|
brighn
|
|
response 32 of 88:
|
Dec 26 06:00 UTC 1995 |
Can it, Rob. You already turned it down.
I wouldn't 100% trust anybody who comes in here. The ones I trust
most, more than myself in fact, are Jenna, Remmers, and Erinn...
*shrug* but tht's just my opinion... I guess we should let the
administrators decide.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 33 of 88:
|
Dec 26 06:27 UTC 1995 |
That, brighn, which you see in response 31 was a joke. A joke and just that.
Nothing more. And usually, Jenne would be aware of that. You're right though,
I don't want to be the fair-witness. Nevertheless, I wonder if you might
entertain me by not telling me to "can it" anymore. Jenne can take care of
herself and nowhere did I say that I didn't trust Jenne and that she wouldn't
make a fine fair-witness.
|
shade
|
|
response 34 of 88:
|
Dec 26 06:33 UTC 1995 |
re 30: My snits...oh yeah...I'd delete all of MY poetry on a whim.
But I could do that now. :}
|
shade
|
|
response 35 of 88:
|
Dec 26 07:09 UTC 1995 |
re: this entire item...thank you all. Politics made me decide to go back
to poetry :}
|
popcorn
|
|
response 36 of 88:
|
Dec 26 13:55 UTC 1995 |
Re 32: Really, I'd rather see the conference participants decide.
|
bubu
|
|
response 37 of 88:
|
Dec 26 15:52 UTC 1995 |
Jenne gets my vote.......
|
rlawson
|
|
response 38 of 88:
|
Dec 26 16:15 UTC 1995 |
Jenne has my vote as well.
|
shade
|
|
response 39 of 88:
|
Dec 26 19:50 UTC 1995 |
re 36: I quite agree. At least in cases where there already are conference
particpants.
|
bruin
|
|
response 40 of 88:
|
Dec 26 23:24 UTC 1995 |
Another Grexer for Jenne!
|
brighn
|
|
response 41 of 88:
|
Dec 27 00:26 UTC 1995 |
Geez, Rob, I apologized privately for that... you don't have to jump
down my throat publicly.
Harumph. Moody artists.
And Rob is pretty moody, too.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 42 of 88:
|
Dec 27 01:05 UTC 1995 |
When I asked what you apologized for, brighn, I had no idea what you were
talking about!! I hadn't read this item before we talked. It all makes sense
now. Please forgive me brighn, I had no idea. I was tired. <robert feels all
stupid and stuff>
|
brighn
|
|
response 43 of 88:
|
Dec 27 16:43 UTC 1995 |
No problemo. :)
Isn't the first snitfit fight we've had, not gonna be the last.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 44 of 88:
|
Dec 27 17:18 UTC 1995 |
There have been other snifits I don't know about!!
|
shade
|
|
response 45 of 88:
|
Dec 28 02:37 UTC 1995 |
So, before this item gets any mroe monstrous, is there a conclusion?
|
rlawson
|
|
response 46 of 88:
|
Dec 28 02:47 UTC 1995 |
We have to wait for James to come back and declare the official weinner (yes,
Jenne, that would be you).
|
brighn
|
|
response 47 of 88:
|
Dec 28 05:18 UTC 1995 |
Eh, I get in so many snitfits, I forget who tehy were with...
oh wait, the one I'm thinking of was with someone else... you're right,
Robert, I've never had a pointless juvenile fight with you before.
*giggle*
I believe this item has lost all critical perspective.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 48 of 88:
|
Dec 28 05:45 UTC 1995 |
That's okay... I believe this is one of those things we can laugh about later,
yes? ;)
|
remmers
|
|
response 49 of 88:
|
Dec 28 14:26 UTC 1995 |
Re #46: Don't you mean the official *weiner*?
|