|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 110 responses total. |
carson
|
|
response 25 of 110:
|
Sep 21 13:41 UTC 1994 |
but I just SENT the danged thing!
oh... the *hardware* party... OK, I'll trade you. ;)
|
jep
|
|
response 26 of 110:
|
Sep 24 14:18 UTC 1994 |
re: the hardware conference... please go ahead and find a new fw for
that conference. I found today, to my astonishment, that I hadn't read
all the new responses since June. I knew I hadn't been a very good fw for
the conference, but that's ridiculous.
I plan to continue reading the conference, at least occasionally, but
a better choice can be found for fw.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 27 of 110:
|
Sep 24 22:25 UTC 1994 |
Any volunteers?
|
carson
|
|
response 28 of 110:
|
Sep 24 22:32 UTC 1994 |
John, I don't think that you should give up being a FW just because a
better choice can be found. I can think of SEVERAL conferences that
fit that bill. You really shouldn't let a three-month "absence" bug you
that much either; all that might mean is that you could use a co-FW.
I noticed that you don't have an automated list of conferences
to go through. One of the things I use to help me keep track
of conferences is a .cflist. This list lets me use the check
command to see which of the conferences I read have new responses.
It also lets me use the next command, so that I don't have to
guess at which conferences I haven't been in. A .cflist is rather
easy to set up. From just about any Ok: prompt, you can type:
set list
and you will be placed in your default editor. From there, all you
need to do is type in the names of your favorite conferences. They
can all be on one line, or all on a separate line, or a combo of the
two. PicoSpan doesn't really care as long as there's something on
the list.
Here's hoping you won't give up yet.
|
carson
|
|
response 29 of 110:
|
Sep 24 22:32 UTC 1994 |
#28 was a response to #26. #27 slipped in. I swear, those vultures... ;)
|
almighty
|
|
response 30 of 110:
|
Sep 25 00:25 UTC 1994 |
I'll volunteer to fw the pseudo conference.
|
sarissa
|
|
response 31 of 110:
|
Sep 25 03:05 UTC 1994 |
I want to!
|
popcorn
|
|
response 32 of 110:
|
Sep 25 07:58 UTC 1994 |
Should I break the news to Carson? Yeah, what the hey. John's one
of the most experienced Picospan users on the system. I'm not sure
what his current status on M-Net is, but he's at various times been
root and cfadm and suchlike, over there. Check /u/jep/.cfdir/.cflist
for his .cflist file. :)
<popcorn hugs carson and gives him an A for effort and his good explanation
that surely will be useful to other people>
Re 31: Are you a pseudo?
Re 30: You're definitely a pseudo! Soon as we find out if sarissa is
a pseudo, I'll add one or both of you as fw's for the pseudo conference.
|
carson
|
|
response 33 of 110:
|
Sep 25 08:46 UTC 1994 |
you mean I can't FW the pseudo conference because I"m real? isn't that
realism or something strange like that?
I figured there was something screwy about jep... ;)
|
popcorn
|
|
response 34 of 110:
|
Sep 25 12:51 UTC 1994 |
Where's Hoolie when you need him? :)
|
davel
|
|
response 35 of 110:
|
Sep 25 19:46 UTC 1994 |
I for one didn't know that "set list" was a way to init your .cflist file.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 36 of 110:
|
Sep 26 14:03 UTC 1994 |
It's not written in stone, but it is traditional that the pseudo
conference be fair witnessed by pseudos. I'm still waiting for
sarissa's answer about whether or not she or he is a pseudo....
|
remmers
|
|
response 37 of 110:
|
Sep 26 18:28 UTC 1994 |
Pseudos shouldn't have to tell whether they're pseudos or not.
|
omni1
|
|
response 38 of 110:
|
Sep 26 19:05 UTC 1994 |
I will volunteer for the micros conf. I know the commands. I am a f-w.
I guess that I'm qualified.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 39 of 110:
|
Sep 26 21:51 UTC 1994 |
Cool! Jep - is this OK by you? Do you want to co-fw or pass on the
conference entirely, or something else?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 40 of 110:
|
Sep 26 22:17 UTC 1994 |
Say omni1 - with you in micros and me in hardware, we could crash everything.
|
scg
|
|
response 41 of 110:
|
Sep 27 01:27 UTC 1994 |
I saw ziggy yesterday, and he says he wants a co fw for iq.
|
omni1
|
|
response 42 of 110:
|
Sep 27 02:59 UTC 1994 |
Interesting thought. ;->
|
carson
|
|
response 43 of 110:
|
Sep 27 05:26 UTC 1994 |
I'll volunteer to co-FW IQ. It'd be a nice balance...
|
popcorn
|
|
response 44 of 110:
|
Sep 27 12:13 UTC 1994 |
Cool! Could someone check with Ziggy to be sure that's OK?
|
carson
|
|
response 45 of 110:
|
Sep 27 12:58 UTC 1994 |
I'll check with ziggy. I haven't talked with anyone in that household
in some time. ;)
|
jep
|
|
response 46 of 110:
|
Sep 28 21:34 UTC 1994 |
Boy, you're taking your chances when you ask me something in an
item... heh. Valerie, unless you can think of some reason to leave me in
as a fw that escapes me, being as I've never done a single fw-ish thing
there, and don't ever plan to, I'd say you can remove me. If it's
advertising or something, just have the fw(s) leave my name in the list; I
don't actually have to be a fw. (-:
I'm root on M-Net, vice president of Arbornet, sysop of the K-12
project, member of the Arbornet technical committee, fw of the staff,
ibmpc, unix, sports, and policy conferences, and ex-cfadm on M-Net. Heh.
How is carson supposed to know that? I appreciate your suggestions very
much, carson. I appreciate any attempt to help.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 47 of 110:
|
Sep 28 22:21 UTC 1994 |
Ok, omni is now the fair witness of the micros conference.
|
carson
|
|
response 48 of 110:
|
Sep 29 00:18 UTC 1994 |
actually, jep, I knew most of that. I feel even sillier.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 49 of 110:
|
Sep 29 03:46 UTC 1994 |
Hey - someone suggested making all fair witnesses fw's of the test
conference. That way fw's could test things out before unleashing
them on their own conferences. What do folks think of this idea?
I like it.
|