You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-55        
 
Author Message
25 new of 55 responses total.
mdw
response 25 of 55: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 23:00 UTC 1994

What are what?  Those (potential) costs could be divided as
follows:
        hardware link charges (the phone line) [monthly]
        hardware per-link costs (the modems) [once only]
        router slice costs (the pc-route box, the nas)
                [on our end, once only, but generally
                priced on a monthly basis by most
                internet service providers.]
        indirect network charges - the costs of
                being connected to everything else.
                (ie, "our share" of the other routers
                on the path to the other end.)
                [usually priced monthly on the basis
                of potential bandwidth used.]
popcorn
response 26 of 55: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 23:29 UTC 1994

We pay something like $15 a phone line a month.  For Grex's internet
connection, we pay for two phone lines, one at Grex's end and one
at ICnet's end.
popcorn
response 27 of 55: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 23:30 UTC 1994

We also have 6 regular dial-in lines, at about $15 a month, electricity
at something like $90 a month, and rent for the dungeon at $25 a month.
nephi
response 28 of 55: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 02:37 UTC 1994

Thanks.
lilmo
response 29 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 05:36 UTC 1995

I'm quite new to this discussion, but it seems that you've got an awfully good
deal going with ICNet, a connection I use and rarely have ANY trouble with, 
and the Merit deal, while *perhaps* leading to greater Michigan access, will
be losing a great deal of its value when free public access is cut. (IMHO)
steve
response 30 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 06:10 UTC 1995

   Well, the reason for using Merit would be cost: $84/mo plus two phone
lines (about $160/mo total) is better than the going rate for ISDN which
is $290/mo for a 64Kbps connection.
popcorn
response 31 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 14:42 UTC 1995

Re 29: If I understand it right, the reason for using the Merit deal is
precicely because people will still be able to use Merit to reach Grex
even after free public access is cut.
lilmo
response 32 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 21:42 UTC 1995

In a word:  Huh?  
sidhe
response 33 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 19:53 UTC 1995

        Valerie, how?
remmers
response 34 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 20:46 UTC 1995

What Valerie is saying in #31, I think, is that if Grex becomes a
Merit member, then Grexers will be able to use their Grex login
id and password as Merit validation, at least to access Grex.
lilmo
response 35 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 21:22 UTC 1995

OK, correct me if I'm wrong, but if Merit eliminates free public access (as is
planned, if I recall) then is it not true that significantly fewer ppl will
be able to access Grex through Merit?  If I'm still OK here, then all I am 
saying is that the Merit hookup loses a great deal of its value and appeal at
that point.
robh
response 36 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 22:02 UTC 1995

If I understand it correctly, and that's a big if, if Grex were
on Merit, then access to Grex via Merit would be free,
assuming that we wanted it to be free.  Which sounds like the best
way to keep access open, if (another big if) it's a reasonable price.
mdw
response 37 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 23:42 UTC 1995

It all depends on how you measure "significantly" -- and it also depends
on how it's implemented.  It won't affect Mark's access, for instance,
'cause he's coming in from out of state.  Primarily, it will affect
people who are in michigan, but not local to A^2/ypsi - or something
like 5-10% of our user population (?).  Even there, it's a bit hard to
analyze, because many of those people are students (so will continue to
have access).  An additional factor is that it's entirely possible
libraries, freenets, or other organizations might fill in part of the
gap there, and grant access to some or all of those users.

If a "grex" login meant an "authorized account" to the Merit NAS, then
it's not very likely the Merit people will be at all thrilled by
"newuser".
scg
response 38 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 02:04 UTC 1995

A good way to find out who would be affected by this would be to look at
the wtmp.  Anybody coming in from burrow.cl.msu.edu (MSU Gopher), the
M-Link gopher (whatever its hostname is), Metronet (metronet.lib.mi.us, I
think, but I could be wrong), and maybe a few other places, are probably
coming in through Merit without authorization.  Those people will be
affected by this.  Those coming in from *.merit.edu or *.mich.net probably
won't be, since telnetting directly here from Merit already requires
authorization.
ajax
response 39 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 07:11 UTC 1995

Re #38, the people coming in from those routes will be affected, but some 
will just be inconvenienced (they have other free routes), while some will
probably lose free access altogether. 
sidhe
response 40 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 14:55 UTC 1995

        To make a quick point, this is all acedemic, until grex quits freezing
me out as soon as I log in, when telnetting in directly from michnet.
        I get as far as login, and password, and then the ICNet advertisement,
and then everything grinds to a screeching halt. It doesn't do this to me
when I telnet in any other way, so something is definetly wrong here.
        Oh, and I might add that I'm not the only one who's having such
        problems
.. I was talking to remmers <I believe..> and he said he was encountering the
same problem.
popcorn
response 41 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 15:19 UTC 1995

Yeah, it's been discussed a lot in the "system problems" item in agora.
andyv
response 42 of 55: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 21:01 UTC 1995

Thanks Valerie for mentioning that.  I was wondering where that info was.
tsty
response 43 of 55: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 23:23 UTC 1995

Actually, what sidhe is talking about seems to be amazingly consistant
with my experience. In attempting to get a newuser here, we went
through NAS. It was the most direct route.
  
However, the last thing that would appear on the screen was the
ICNet line - - -then BLANKNESS -total, complete and unremitting.
  
We tried a couple of times on a couple of days. 
  
However, by going through an intermediary machine from NAS to here,
everything worked just nifty!
  
Color us confused.
sidhe
response 44 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 1 16:22 UTC 1995

        That's PRECISELY what my problem is!
tsty
response 45 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 06:29 UTC 1995

staff??
popcorn
response 46 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 18:13 UTC 1995

That's PRECISELY what the known problem with Merit NAS's is, as discussed
in many other places on the system.  As I understand it, Merit's NASs
aren't implementing the network protocols quite right, while Grex's
router expects to talk to systems that do implement the protocol correctly.
Something about a MTU size (I don't know exactly what an MTU is).
Staff needs to talk to Ivars about making a change on his side of the
connection, so Grex can change the MTU(?) on Grex's side of the
connection.  I'm again pretty foggy here, but I think Merit needs a
large number for the MTU, but it's more efficient to use a small number.
Or something like that....
tsty
response 47 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 08:39 UTC 1995

Ummmmm, it the problem is because of some protocol that Merit is
implementing incorrectly, why is the fix Grex's burden? (or ICNet's?)
steve
response 48 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 16:00 UTC 1995

   It's "our" burden, because once we changed routers, things broke
getting to us.  That points the finger at the NetBSD/FreeBSD
implementations for the AT.  We think we have a general handle on
things, and it might be the case that with some tweaking at the
IC-Net portmaster we can fix it.  Maybe.
lilmo
response 49 of 55: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 17:39 UTC 1995

Tell Merit "Thpppbt!" and to fix THEIR machine !!  Bleah.
 0-24   25-49   50-55        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss