|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 140 responses total. |
scott
|
|
response 25 of 140:
|
Dec 15 05:09 UTC 2003 |
Re 23: Actually *I* have speculated, here on Grex, that perhaps Saddam had
been captured long ago.
|
sj2
|
|
response 26 of 140:
|
Dec 15 05:15 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sj2
|
|
response 27 of 140:
|
Dec 15 05:21 UTC 2003 |
Re #24, you are forgetting the half-a-million or so Iraqi
children who died for the lack of food and medicines during a decade
of sanctions. It is appalling, how the international community can
demonize Saddam for it and not take any blame for that??!!
The Lancet
Volume 351(9103)
February 28, 1998
p 657
------------------------------------------
Does Iraq's depleted uranium pose a health risk?
Birchard, Karen
-------------------------------------------
The office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights has
received a report hypothesising that the current health and
environmental problems in Iraq may be linked to US and British weapons
left behind after the Gulf War in 1991.
The literature review, compiled by Bill Griffin, an Irish petrochemical
engineer, with access to material in both the West and Iraq, points out
that the mortality rates among children have increased sharply: as
many as 500 children a day are dying in Iraq along with cancer rates.
He proposes that radioactive waste caused by projectiles containing
depleted uranium (DU) may have played a part. DU weapons were
developed by the Pentagon in the late 1970s as anti-tank armour-
piercing shells but were not used in combat until the Gulf War. DU is
a radioactive by-product of the enrichment process used to make
nuclear fuel rods and nuclear bombs.
The report notes that the death rate per 1000 Iraqi children under 5
years of age increased from 2.3 in 1989 to 16.6 in 1993. Cases of
lymphoblastic leukaemia have more than quadrupled with other cancers
also increasing "at an alarming rate". In men, lung, bladder,
bronchus, skin, and stomach cancers show the highest increase. In
women, the highest increases are in breast and bladder cancer, and non-
Hodgkin lymphoma. Diseases such as osteosarcoma, teratoma,
nephroblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma are also increasing with,
according to the review, the most affected being children
and young men. Congenital malformations have also increased, as have
diseases of the immune system.
The review says that a confidential report by the British Atomic Energy
Authority in 1991 estimated that at least 40 tonnes of DU were
dispersed in Kuwait and Iraq; but according to Greenpeace-based on US
government information released under the Freedom of Information Act-
"over 300 tonnes of DU mostly in fragmented form (dust) were left on
the battlefields in Iraq and Kuwait".
--------------------------------------------------------------------
See the whole item here:
http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/1999/msg00246.html
Who accounts for these??
|
sj2
|
|
response 28 of 140:
|
Dec 15 05:29 UTC 2003 |
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E8C356F9-E89F-4CD3-88B5-
BBBDF9E085C1.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uranium/0,7368,419839,00.html
While you celebrate and thump your chests at the arrest of Saddam, who
cares about these?? The Iraqi children and thousands of soldiers - US,
British and Iraqi - who got affected by DU shells?
The British government admitted that there might be a link. The US
flatly denied it.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 29 of 140:
|
Dec 15 06:48 UTC 2003 |
It is possible that Saddam will cooperate with the US, tell all, and
offer to speak to his country to tell the guerillas to lay down their
arms and cooperate in rebuilding the country. It might save his skin -
or even make him a candidate for the Nobel prize.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 30 of 140:
|
Dec 15 07:26 UTC 2003 |
Despite some of the truly appalling Peace Prize awards over the years
(Kissinger? Arafat?) I doubt Hussein will be planning a trip to Oslo
any time in the near future..
|
bhoward
|
|
response 31 of 140:
|
Dec 15 07:31 UTC 2003 |
Uh, yeah.
So you want to like pass some of whatever it is your having
down this way?
:-)
|
bhoward
|
|
response 32 of 140:
|
Dec 15 07:32 UTC 2003 |
(Re#30 slipped in)
A trip to the Hague is more likely.
|
clees
|
|
response 33 of 140:
|
Dec 15 09:43 UTC 2003 |
Not unless the US recognizes the International Court of Justice.
Btw, by the looks of him I truly think I have seen Saddam scurrying
around the dustbins nearAmsterdam Central Train Station, the last
couple of months.
Seriously,
I am curious what details mr. Hussein is going to provide in about the
US schemes in the eighties when they supported him in the war against
Iraq. Or before that when they virtually helped get into power.
Every single time this happened with republicans in office. Coincidence?
|
bhoward
|
|
response 34 of 140:
|
Dec 15 10:01 UTC 2003 |
The US isn't a signatory to it and therefore does not consider its
nationals under its jurisdiction. I'm not certain that simple fact
would at all stop it from turning over a national from another country
to the court or to authorities of a country that has signed onto the
international court.
|
twenex
|
|
response 35 of 140:
|
Dec 15 10:10 UTC 2003 |
Neither the US nor Iraq recognise the ICC. However, if the new Iraqi
administration chooses to recognise it, they might turn him over
instead of trying him in their own courts.
Also, a separate war crimes tribunal could be set up under the UN (the
court that is trying Milosevic is a war crimes tribunal, not the ICC).
However, this would require the legalization under UN law of the
occupation of Iraq, otherwise the UN would have no jurisdiction.
|
jp2
|
|
response 36 of 140:
|
Dec 15 13:24 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
twenex
|
|
response 37 of 140:
|
Dec 15 14:24 UTC 2003 |
Pax Americana?
|
scott
|
|
response 38 of 140:
|
Dec 15 14:25 UTC 2003 |
Hmm... Bush secretly flies into Baghdad just a few days before Saddam is
finally captured... maybe it's time for a conspiracy item?
|
twenex
|
|
response 39 of 140:
|
Dec 15 14:35 UTC 2003 |
Agora *is* the conspiracy item.
|
bru
|
|
response 40 of 140:
|
Dec 15 14:54 UTC 2003 |
"27 of 39: by Siddhartha Jain (sj2) on Mon, Dec 15, 2003 (00:21):
Re #24, you are forgetting the half-a-million or so Iraqi
children who died for the lack of food and medicines during a decade
of sanctions. It is appalling, how the international community can
demonize Saddam for it and not take any blame for that??!!"
Well, do you think you could try and blame Saddam Hussein, who spent millions
of dollars building palaces adn buying the loyalty of his batthist party adn
the army rather than buying food to feed and medicine to cure these children?
|
sj2
|
|
response 41 of 140:
|
Dec 15 16:29 UTC 2003 |
"It is appalling, how the international community can
demonize Saddam for it and not take any blame for that??!!"
Implies that Saddam is definitely to blame but so are the countries
that supported the crippling sanctions.
And you conveniently skipped the BIG issue of DU shells!!
|
gull
|
|
response 42 of 140:
|
Dec 15 17:07 UTC 2003 |
Re resp:19: I'm just hoping they call Rumsfeld as a witness. After all,
he used to be Saddam's buddy. ;>
Re resp:25: I never believed that conspiracy theory about Saddam, or the
parallel one about Osama. Too many people would have to know about it
for it to stay secret for long.
Re resp:41: I think, given all the known cancer-causing petroleum
byproducts that were strewn over Iraq when the Kuwaiti oil wells were
set on fire, it's a stretch to conclude that an increase in cancer rate
is due to depleted uranium.
|
lk
|
|
response 43 of 140:
|
Dec 16 00:14 UTC 2003 |
For a potential link between Saddam/Iraq and Osama/AlQauida, see:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/14/wterr14.xml
&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/14/ixportaltop.html
|
russ
|
|
response 44 of 140:
|
Dec 16 04:25 UTC 2003 |
On Saddam's capture and what it means:
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/13422.htm
Several extremely insightful (and LONG) posts on related issues:
http://www.denbeste.nu/
Did you read about the anti-terrorist, anti-Baathist demonstration
in Baghdad? No? Probably because the liberal media didn't think
it was news. But thanks to independent media you can see it anyway:
http://www.donaldsensing.com/2003_12_01_archive.html#107109864088011111
And someone who seems to have read Scott's mind:
http://www.americandigest.org/mt-archives/000749.html
|
sj2
|
|
response 45 of 140:
|
Dec 16 09:04 UTC 2003 |
There was Saddam-got-captured celebrations. There were saddam-got-
captured protests (though, definitely smaller is number). Half of the
Arab world celebrated the capture of a tyrant and the other half was
humiliated by the capture of an Arab hero who stood against the Jews
and Americans.
There were communistst waving flags in the streets of Baghdad. There
were religious political parties waving.
Al-Jazeera shows a cartoon of Uncle Sam hoisting Saddam first, then
pulling him down and then arresting him. Fox reports nothing about the
blasts in Baghdad or US Army blowing kids to bits in Afghanistan.
Saddam's sister accused that he had been drugged before capture. An
american soldier said Saddam wanted to *negotiate* the capture.
Rumsfeld sneered that Saddam didn't even fire his pistol and
surrendered meekly.
Saddam himself cooperated after the arrest and for the medical
examination. But thereafter is reported to be spouting anger and
abuse. He is reported to be defiant and showing no remorse.
Blair could be seen on a definite high in the British parliament -
attacking the opposition and shouting loudly.
The Sanchez guy in Baghdad was grinning ear-to-ear all the time. There
were more blasts in Baghdad meanwhile killing more people.
So and so forth.
|
lk
|
|
response 46 of 140:
|
Dec 16 11:47 UTC 2003 |
There are rumors that Lebanese terror mastermind Imad Mughniyeh has
arrived in Iraq to boot anti-US violence. For those not familiar with
the name, this is the person who according to some terrorism experts
made Osama bin Laden look like small potatoes.
I've also seen an analysis that Saddam was being held captive in the
mother of all spider pits, his captors negotiating for the $25M bounty.
It is unclear if he was snatched away from them or if this was part
of the bargain. [That he was allowed to keep his handgun seems to
contradict this, but perhaps he hadn't realized his friends had turned
on him.]
|
gull
|
|
response 47 of 140:
|
Dec 16 14:48 UTC 2003 |
Re resp:44: Actually, I heard about the anti-Saddam celebrations. On
liberal NPR, no less!
(Do you actually ever watch/listen to/read any of the "liberal media",
or do you just make assumptions based on what you think their bias is?
Also, by what stretch of the imagination is Fox News "independent"?)
Incidentally, have you noticed that the reaction of Iraqis to pretty
much anything seems to be to fire guns into the air? During the same
newscast yesterday I heard about one incident of them firing into the
air in celebration, and another of them firing into the air in mourning.
That country is like the NRA's wet dream. ;>
|
twenex
|
|
response 48 of 140:
|
Dec 16 15:23 UTC 2003 |
LOL.
|
sj2
|
|
response 49 of 140:
|
Dec 16 16:41 UTC 2003 |
And BBC News is liberal?? How about CNN?
Hehehe ... I don't know if this is true ... but still thought it was
worth posting.
From http://www.moderateindependent.com/v1i3mediawatch.htm
MAY 15, 2003 MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA Taking on those Democrats and
others who are unpatriotic , Australian-owned Fox News, USA Today, NY
Post, Chicago Sun Times, and numerous other Aussie-controlled news
operations promise to clear things up by presenting the true, American
view of things.
Rupert Murdoch, owner of all the above listed news sources and many,
many more helped explain his Americanizing mission from his
original home town of Melbourne, Australia.
As someone who was born in Australia, said Rupert Murdoch, speaking
beside a barbie on which he was throwing another shrimp, and who is
married to a woman who is from China, I feel that I and my Australian-
owned news sources are the most qualified to present the true American
perspective on things. Those other, American-owned news sources, like
the New York Times and NPR, simply don t know anything about being a
good American. They betray American values on a daily basis, as far as
I can tell from down here on the other side of the world, where I was
born and all my family live.
The American flag a permanent fixture on the screen of his Fox News
Network, Murdoch sits stroking his pet koala, eating some Vegamite,
pointing out a kangaroo in the distance. Of course my news sources
are the real American ones. How could some paper owned by New Yorkers
be more patriotic than the ones owned by me? Or a radio network funded
by donations from American listeners? No, no, no. I know the true
voice of America, like no American possibly could if I didn t spell it
out for them on a daily basis.
Throughout the interview, his love and respect for his wife Wendy Deng
Murdoch was very much apparent. Any time I have some doubts about
whether I since I am not from America am striking the right
American note, I ask Wendy, who is also from the other side of the
world. Between my Down-Under upbringing and her Red China view of
things, we come up with the real American perspective like no actual
American possibly could.
|