|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 84 responses total. |
edina
|
|
response 25 of 84:
| 
Apr 18 18:20 UTC 2002 |
Ok - *that's* funny!
|
jp2
|
|
response 26 of 84:
|
Apr 18 18:53 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 27 of 84:
|
Apr 18 20:59 UTC 2002 |
You and me against the world?
|
md
|
|
response 28 of 84:
|
Apr 18 21:31 UTC 2002 |
23: Surely you don't mean that the person in question is even stupider
and worse-educated than *you*? ;-)
|
jp2
|
|
response 29 of 84:
|
Apr 18 21:59 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
flem
|
|
response 30 of 84:
|
Apr 19 00:30 UTC 2002 |
iwbg iwbg
|
oval
|
|
response 31 of 84:
|
Apr 19 01:09 UTC 2002 |
i don't use a twit filter. i'm not surprised that the few people who do use
it, are also the least tolerant people. i wonder if leeron uses one?
it doesn't upset me when jamie insults me or tells me how much he hates me.
i know he does it just cuz he really LUVS me. <blows a kiss to jamie>
|
jep
|
|
response 32 of 84:
|
Apr 19 01:19 UTC 2002 |
I don't use a twit filter. I've seen so many twits become interesting
people, I'd be afraid to.
|
jazz
|
|
response 33 of 84:
|
Apr 19 04:08 UTC 2002 |
Again, filtering depends on context. If agora became flooded with
people posting garbage, even if there was the potential that eventually they
would say something worth reading, I might filter it. Of course, it getting
flooded in the first place tends to kill off any real conversation anyway.
|
gull
|
|
response 34 of 84:
|
Apr 19 13:56 UTC 2002 |
I'm too paranoid to filter. I'm afraid the people I filtered would
figure out I was filtering them, then make comments about me behind my
back. ;)
|
edina
|
|
response 35 of 84:
|
Apr 19 16:52 UTC 2002 |
Oh yeah, because that never happens.
|
jp2
|
|
response 36 of 84:
|
Apr 19 16:56 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
edina
|
|
response 37 of 84:
|
Apr 19 16:56 UTC 2002 |
jamie - it's not nice to make me just bust out laughing like that.
|
jp2
|
|
response 38 of 84:
|
Apr 19 16:58 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 39 of 84:
|
Apr 19 17:00 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
blaise
|
|
response 40 of 84:
|
Apr 19 21:32 UTC 2002 |
I filter one twit (*not* Jamie or brighn) because the twit has never entered
a post that I have any interest in reading and at one point was so prolific
that half my available online time was spent forgetting posts s/he had
entered.
|
oval
|
|
response 41 of 84:
|
Apr 19 21:36 UTC 2002 |
who?! (unless it's me, then i won't get an answer:(
|
jp2
|
|
response 42 of 84:
|
Apr 19 23:59 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 43 of 84:
|
Apr 20 02:41 UTC 2002 |
I've used party's 'ignore' command. Usually because it was the only way to
control the scrolling. "Freedm of speech" does NOT mean anyone has to listen.
|
brighn
|
|
response 44 of 84:
|
Apr 20 04:25 UTC 2002 |
My guess for #40 would be Sindi.
|
jp2
|
|
response 45 of 84:
|
Apr 20 06:56 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
sarkhel
|
|
response 46 of 84:
|
Apr 20 19:00 UTC 2002 |
Why some people think that they are the guardians of the humanbeings, they
are the guardians of the so called good things and they are the ONLY one to
deceide what to be read and what not? We must remember that the world is
changing, today if one thing is BAD tomorrow it may be GOOD and noone in this
grex is God or the son of the God
|
morwen
|
|
response 47 of 84:
|
Apr 20 19:04 UTC 2002 |
Jamie, I have a question for you.
If you dislike grex so much and think you are so much better, why,
then, do you participate?
|
jp2
|
|
response 48 of 84:
|
Apr 20 19:31 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 49 of 84:
|
Apr 20 20:59 UTC 2002 |
That's quite true. Maybe someday you'll be one.
|