|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 49 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 25 of 49:
|
Mar 22 16:38 UTC 1992 |
Whenever I wanted my phono stylus examined under a microscope, I used to
drag it over to Hi Fi Buys. Alas, they are no longer in business. Does
anyone else in the area offer such a free service?
Another question relating to the demise of Hi Fi Buys: who's the nearest
NAD dealer now? Nakamichi? Bang & Olufsen?
|
steve
|
|
response 26 of 49:
|
Mar 22 19:56 UTC 1992 |
I'm sorry to hear about HiFi Buys. No, I don't know of another; I'd
like to know who will be the best in the area now. Sigh.
|
morel
|
|
response 27 of 49:
|
Mar 23 18:07 UTC 1992 |
Have you tried the folks in the old Hi Fi Buys location? Overature
Audio (they changed the name of their business when they realized their
phone number was going to be 662-*1812* ;-) has always been good to me.
I don't know if they offered free stylus checking service, but I would
not be at all surprised if they do. What the hell, I just called them
and sure enough, they do. Was also told if you bring in your turntable,
they'll be happy to set up the new stylus/cartidge to optimum performance
for you if indeed you need a new one. If you stop in, ask for Keith, the
manager(/owner?) and tell him I said hi.
|
krj
|
|
response 28 of 49:
|
Mar 24 05:17 UTC 1992 |
Yeah, but would Overture Audio deign to touch a P-mount cartridge? :-)
I'll give 'em a call, thanks; Overture Audio is descended from the
old Absolute Sound store that used to be on State Street, and they sold
me a really nice turntable once.
|
morel
|
|
response 29 of 49:
|
Mar 24 15:19 UTC 1992 |
Right, Keith Moorman (sp?) used to be the manager at Absolute Sound and
opened Overture when Absolute Sound closed. He and his
co-workers/employees have always done well by me even though I've always
bought equipment that's near the bottom of the line of what they offer.
(They still can't believe I'm happy with my old Dual 506 instead of one of
their Lynn turntables, but $1500 for bottom of the line is a bit steep for
me. ;-)
|
krj
|
|
response 30 of 49:
|
Mar 26 02:53 UTC 1992 |
The Linn Axis has gone to $1500? Oh dear.
|
morel
|
|
response 31 of 49:
|
Mar 26 03:52 UTC 1992 |
(Actually don't quote me on that. This goes back to the Absolute Sound
days, and prices/modles may well have changed since then, and I'm sure my
memory has...)
|
arabella
|
|
response 32 of 49:
|
Jun 26 22:40 UTC 1992 |
Is anyone familiar with the compact Sony DAT recorder, sort of
like the Walkman Professional, only smaller and digital? I've
seen it being promoted as an ideal recorder for vocalists who
sometimes need to make audition tapes and the like. I'm very
happy with my Walkman Professional, but I'm also very curious
about this DAT machine.
|
cwb
|
|
response 33 of 49:
|
Dec 17 04:35 UTC 1992 |
I have two questions. First of all, I'm
considering buying a second set of speakers for surround-sound
effect. A. Can anyone tell me if it's
worth the money? B. My receiver/amp is rated
at 50W. What power range should I be
loking in for speakers? C. Does anyone have
any favorites in this power range?
2. Has anyone heard that Bose Musicbox thing
that's supposed to replace an amp/speakers setup
with one box that "fills a room like
the top-of-the-line stereo equipment today?"
|
eric2
|
|
response 34 of 49:
|
Dec 21 05:12 UTC 1992 |
Unless you have a stereo VCR and you rent a lot of movies, there's no point in
spending the money on surround sound equiptment. Very few movies are available
that were recorded in true dolby surround sound, and it's really not worth the
money (yet, at least). 50 watts is probably okay...most surround sound
speakers are only around 10-30 watts...and many decoders come with built in
amplifiers.
|
daes
|
|
response 35 of 49:
|
Dec 21 22:41 UTC 1992 |
I read somewhere how to make surround sound with just speakers and wire.
Is this really possible, and if so, does anyone remember how to do it?
|
steve
|
|
response 36 of 49:
|
Dec 22 04:39 UTC 1992 |
I doubt it. With a lot of wire to another set of speakers you
*might* be able to induce enough of a phase distortion that it might
sound more like an echo. But the "echo" effect is all you'd get, and
it would take a hell of a lot of wire!
I too think surround sound would be a waste, unless you're life
begins to revolve around vid style entertainment...
|
daes
|
|
response 37 of 49:
|
Dec 22 17:01 UTC 1992 |
Well, I remember that it involved connecting the left speaker to left+ and
the right speaker to right+ and I think connecting the ground to each other,
but I may also remember it wrong--I've done it before.
|
tcc
|
|
response 38 of 49:
|
Jan 3 07:48 UTC 1993 |
I dunno, I kind of like surround sound equipment. Better yet, get an
'expander'... dunno if they are available as components, but I had a Panasonic
boombox that had an 'expander' setting that made the sound three times wider
than the apparent visual speaker seperation.
|
steve
|
|
response 39 of 49:
|
Jan 7 22:33 UTC 1993 |
Ok, does someone want to explain what a "1 bit D/A" is? I just saw
this in the ad copy for a CD player. In general, have portable battry
operated CD players gotten any better in the last 3-4 years? I have a
Sony DT-4 CD/AM/FM player that seems to be getting bitchy about alignment
problems. Wondering if it makes sense to start lusting after a new one?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 40 of 49:
|
Jan 8 16:13 UTC 1993 |
Other than that I'd assume it's a 1-bit Digital -> Analog converter,
I'm at somewhat of a loss to figure out why it's a good thing.. Typo?
|
steve
|
|
response 41 of 49:
|
Jan 8 19:03 UTC 1993 |
No, I don't think so. I've seen it a couple of times now.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 42 of 49:
|
Jan 10 08:55 UTC 1993 |
hmmm..
Well, I broke down and blew some money on stereo equipment this weekend
so now I have something that can legitimately be called a stereo system
(instead of a glorified boombox or my housemate's stereo, which are what
I had access to before..)
|
krj
|
|
response 43 of 49:
|
Feb 13 20:57 UTC 1993 |
After years of living with taped-together headphones, and headphones with
no foam pads which buzzed, Leslie finally bought a new pair of Sennheiser's
more or less on impulse. These are the HD 480 II's. The top end have
the Sennheiser flavor that I'm used to and quite partial to, but the bass
is really too heavy; I think Sennheiser is going for the Koss market.
I usually roll the bass control back a *lot* with these new headphones.
We also got a new decent tape deck; we're finally free of the tyrrany of
Nakamichi!!
:-)
n
|
skeez
|
|
response 44 of 49:
|
Jul 4 16:40 UTC 1993 |
Iv'e got some digital headphones, from Sony, they run for $15.00....They're
great, but are fragile. Also The Panasonic XBS, are around the same price,
but are very durable, and provide ALOT of bass....(Good for those of us who
like alot of BOOM with our tunes.
|
skeez
|
|
response 45 of 49:
|
Jul 4 20:45 UTC 1993 |
Sorry, In response to the bit i wrote about Headphones, the Sony's are called
"MDR-14's....They are really nice...
|
danr
|
|
response 46 of 49:
|
Nov 6 13:11 UTC 1993 |
re #39
A one-bit D/A converter is exactly what the name implies. It takes
the serial data stream off of the CD and turns it into an analog
signal. Depending on the conveter used, it does this with an
effective 16-bit to 22-bit resolution. The trick is that it uses a
sophisticated digital filter to recreate the analog signal from the
serial data stream. I have an app note from Analog Devices if anyone
is truly interested in this.
|
redwood
|
|
response 47 of 49:
|
Nov 9 04:46 UTC 1993 |
I would find this interesting to read. I've been looking at portable
CD players and have found that the one-bit D/A converters sound better.
|
aruba
|
|
response 48 of 49:
|
Apr 30 17:40 UTC 1994 |
My roommate has a pioneer cd player/changer which is cutting out on him.
Could anyone recommend a reputable place to get service done on it?
If anyone wants to discuss the details of the problem, we could do that
too.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 49 of 49:
|
May 31 05:54 UTC 1994 |
A discussion of speaker cables started in classified. This response is
to preserve that discussion - and continue it, as seen fit:
#4 of 19: by Robert Esteves (esteves) on Wed, May 11, 1994 (13:13):
Hello Matt, I am looking for some high end speaker cables. More specifically
Audio Quest clear speaker cables 4' pair in Bi-wire.
#5 of 19: by TS Taylor (tsty) on Thu, May 12, 1994 (23:36):
For "high end" speaker wires - use the thickest stuff you can find,
even welding cable. The oxygen-free and allthat sort of pr is
balony, or worse.
If you can't afford welding cable, run 4-5 strands of #12 ga or #10 ga
together for each "wire." I prefer thhn or thnn or an entire jacket
of romex for each "wire" when I need the current handling and
damping factor impovement.
#6 of 19: by Robert Esteves (esteves) on Fri, May 13, 1994 (14:15):
Matt, I'm still interested in the wire.
but thanks TS
#7 of 19: by Robert Esteves (esteves) on Mon, May 16, 1994 (00:20):
Actually, There is a difference in speaker wire. There is a big problem in
just using huge wires because of the skin effect. The base signal will eat
the high end alive.
Matt, are you still around??
#8 of 19: by Klaus (n8nxf) on Tue, May 17, 1994 (15:30):
Skin effect at 40 KHz! Ha ha! Ok, go to your local hardware store and
buy him out of all the 3/4 in. Cu pipe and fittings he has. Use it to
construct your own speaker wire. (2 runs per speaker.) Get some 4 in.
Cu flashing to make the connections to and from amp. and speakers. Don't
forget to rewind your crossovers and make connections to the drivers with
the same stuff. (...and I use to worry about RG9913 at 400 MHz!)
#9 of 19: by TS Taylor (tsty) on Wed, May 25, 1994 (05:14):
Yeh, the "skin effect" for audio speaker wires is the effect of the
consumer getting "skinned" paying for it.
Love the idiot-sales that the audio industry gets away with.
#10 of 19: by Klaus (n8nxf) on Wed, May 25, 1994 (07:55):
(One of my favorites is the $450.00 clock someone sells that disapates
"wayward electrons" that effect the quality of audio. It's built around
a $9.95 digital clock from K-mart.)
#11 of 19: by TS Taylor (tsty) on Thu, May 26, 1994 (03:46):
You *are* kidding, n8nxf, pleeeeease tell me you are kidding .....
#12 of 19: by Klaus (n8nxf) on Thu, May 26, 1994 (08:46):
Sorry tsty, I can't do that. Many audiophiles haven't a clue when is
comes to science. There are more such fine devices in the high-end
audiophile market. Larry Klein, who writes articles for Electronics
Now, is constantly bashing shuch stuff and, of course, they bash him
in their editorials. Who knows. We each belive what we want to.
Maybe wayward electrons do effect audio quality. Maybe sticking little
self-adhesive dots all over your listening room also improves the
audio quality. (Yes tsty, that's another one.)
#13 of 19: by Robert Esteves (esteves) on Thu, May 26, 1994 (15:06):
Yes there are some silly scams out there. But there is also some science
involved in the audio also.
good cables try to limit the effects of "overshoot" that is the energy
kicked back down the speaker cables by the driver going too far in its travel
and creating energy. If you tell a driver to go x it will be carried to some
x+n by inertia. The n causes the 8 pound magnet to generate a sizable spike.
The cables attempt to limit this effect. The cables are tuned, and they use
no strand greater than 18ga and many many of them. If you want to
demonstrate over shoot hook a flash light bulp up to the low freq input on
There are 5 lines left (85%). Press <space> for more, or 'i' to return.
Message 4/10 From Cathbad@aol.com
Page
2
demonstrate over shoot hook a flash light bulp up to the low freq input on
one of my 801's and carefully move the woofer.
The difference in cables is noticable, I suggest you try it before
saying how 'silly' it is. Try going to an audio store and borrowing some
cables. Either Clear 2's or Dragons; if your system is good enough you
should be able to tell the difference.
#14 of 19: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Thu, May 26, 1994 (17:22):
It has been my observation that, after going to all this trouble for
a minutia of advantage, most so-called hi-fi enthusiasts crank up the
bass and turn down the treble, and wallow in a frequency response very
unlike the original.
#15 of 19: by Klaus (n8nxf) on Fri, May 27, 1994 (08:49):
He he he! So why can't one use solid wire? Why stranded? Of course
your woofer will light a small lamp when you push on the cone as you
mentioned. That driver is nothing more than a linear DC permanant
magnet motor. If you connect your lamp to this type of motor and
spin the shaft, it will light too. Most devices that produce mechanical
energy when electricty is applied will also produce electricity when
mechanical energy is applied. All drivers used in speaker systems exhibit
this effect. The tuning of speaker cable is pure BS! The only reason
you'd want stranded wire is to make it more flexable. Solid wire would be
a better choice, for a given size, since there is no air between the
strands giving it less resistance per unit length. To counter the effects
of driver overshoot you want to couple the drivers as tightly as possible
to the amplifier. On the other hand you want to seperate the speakers
so you can enjoy the stereo effect. The whole point is the reduce the
impedance between the amp. and the drivers. i.e. large wire with low
resistance per unit length! Many, many other things can contribute to
the resistance between amp and the drivers: Terminal resistance, cross
over resistance, resistance between the output drivers inside the amp.
and the amp's speaker terminals, etc. I even have an old Kenwood amp.
that has sense lines that sense the voltage at the speaker terminals
so that it can compansate for any cable losses.
As a further point, anything that I pay a lot of money for and that
the "pros" say does great things for sound quality will sound better
to me. That's human nature. If there really is a differance is a
mute point.
#16 of 19: by TS Taylor (tsty) on Sun, May 29, 1994 (01:46):
esteves, the "good cables" that "try to limit the effects of 'overshoot'" are
teh cables withthe +least+ resistance/impedance! that's the dampening factor
of the ++amplifier++ that succeeds (or fails) at that.
Those amplifiers with "sense" lines for woofer stuff really improved the "t
~p
"tight" bass sound, as did proper acoustic loading of the bass speakers.
|