|
Grex > Mnet > #36: Agenda Item for June 13 Board Meeting | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 21 new of 45 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 25 of 45:
| 
Jun 11 22:44 UTC 2000 |
Unfortunately there is an immense gap between "we want to go out of our way
to provide good service to our users" (seldon in resp:22) and
the two-to-three week outage anticipated in resp:24. (We're at Day 11
now, another week would make Day 18.) Does anyone *want* to provide
bad service? I doubt it.
In party, I'm hearing a steady stream of comments along the lines of
"I want my e-mail!" And the most alarming comment: "Is m-net gone
permanently?"
|
void
|
|
response 26 of 45:
|
Jun 12 00:58 UTC 2000 |
this is almost as bad as the three-week m-net outage in the summer
of 1995. we lived without m-net for three weeks then, and even though
it's not particularly pleasant, we can do it again.
|
slynne
|
|
response 27 of 45:
|
Jun 12 01:06 UTC 2000 |
Yeah, grex has gotten a lot faster since the last time I used it regularly.
I am not hurting having to conference here.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 28 of 45:
|
Jun 12 01:07 UTC 2000 |
M-Net is not gone permanently. For further info, inadequate and frustrating
though it may be, see Item 38.
|
jerryr
|
|
response 29 of 45:
|
Jun 12 02:20 UTC 2000 |
is all the griping in the world, all the nay-saying, all the hand-wringing
going to bring m-nut back online any sooner?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 30 of 45:
|
Jun 12 02:56 UTC 2000 |
Nay, I say. ;-)
|
tsty
|
|
response 31 of 45:
|
Jun 12 03:15 UTC 2000 |
at least the grim reaper could be stowed away for a couple of months.
|
polvo
|
|
response 32 of 45:
|
Jun 12 03:26 UTC 2000 |
You are drunk.
|
willard
|
|
response 33 of 45:
|
Jun 12 04:04 UTC 2000 |
#32: That's my conclusion, as well.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 34 of 45:
|
Jun 12 06:43 UTC 2000 |
Normally, I wouldn't accuse him of being drunk...but #31 just left me going
"Huh?"
|
lelande
|
|
response 35 of 45:
|
Jun 12 07:38 UTC 2000 |
we know, kevin.
we know.
|
buzzard
|
|
response 36 of 45:
|
Jun 12 11:11 UTC 2000 |
See?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 37 of 45:
|
Jun 12 13:15 UTC 2000 |
I'm guessing here, but I think he was trying to say that the downtime
shouldn't be counted for purposes of the one-month reap rule.
|
dpc
|
|
response 38 of 45:
|
Jun 12 14:41 UTC 2000 |
That's what I think, too.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 39 of 45:
|
Jun 12 15:48 UTC 2000 |
That is, hold off the grim reaper program to give users a chance
to rediscover that M-net is working again.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 40 of 45:
|
Jun 12 16:46 UTC 2000 |
Yep. And it's a good idea.
|
trex
|
|
response 41 of 45:
|
Jun 12 20:09 UTC 2000 |
thats a good idea. someone will have to remind me of that.. :)
|
tpryan
|
|
response 42 of 45:
|
Jun 12 22:14 UTC 2000 |
Rex, don't forget to hold off the grim reaper to give users a chance
to rediscover that M-net is working again.
sorry, I had prime real estate on that one ;)
|
styles
|
|
response 43 of 45:
|
Jun 12 23:49 UTC 2000 |
Could someone perhaps keep me posted about BoD discussions on improving the
web interface, being that I will most likely not be able to attend, given the
present circumstances (i.e. I live in Brooklyn)?
Thanky.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 44 of 45:
|
Jun 13 00:01 UTC 2000 |
You got it.
|
tsty
|
|
response 45 of 45:
|
Jun 13 09:11 UTC 2000 |
thankxx to the preceptinve for being able to recognize a good idea at
first glance.
|