You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-28         
 
Author Message
4 new of 28 responses total.
kentn
response 25 of 28: Mark Unseen   May 15 13:19 UTC 2010

Of course, I don't think we're planning on changing from doing medical
education conferences to assisting children like the organization in 
the link information.  That is definitely a change in purpose for an
organization and would require re-review.  
remmers
response 26 of 28: Mark Unseen   May 23 14:06 UTC 2010

Grex (or more properly, Cyberspace Communication, Inc.) is a
Michigan not-for-profit corporation and as such is legally bound
by its Articles of Incorporation: 
http://grex.org/cyberspace/articles.xhtml

Here's what the Articles say about our mission:

    The Corporation is organized for such charitable and
    educational purposes as may qualify it for exemption from the
    federal income tax under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal
    Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or the corresponding
    provisions of any future United States internal revenue law.)
    More specifically, such purposes include, but are not limited
    to, the advancement of public education and scientific
    endeavor through interaction with computers, and humans via
    computers, using computer conferencing. Further purposes
    include the exchange of scientific and technical information
    about the various aspects of computer science, such as
    operating systems, computer networks, and computer
    programming.

Is anybody thinking of taking Grex in a direction that's wholly at
variance with this?  I'm inclined to doubt it and in any case, the
mission statement is open-ended enough to give us a lot of
flexibility to tweak things, I'd think.  Note the "not limited to"
escape hatch, in particular.

Whatever else it is that we might want to do, I do think that Grex
could benefit from a major facelift to the conferencing software,
which is solid and stable but *SO* 1980s.  My feeling is that the
rigid and venerable conferencing model on which Grex (and M-Net,
and a few other systems) is based needs a serious re-do in the
direction of more flexibility, probably by recasting it as a web
service with an open API.  Something that would facilitate the
development of third-party clients, in much the way that can
currently be done with Twitter, Netflix, and any number of other
web services.

Of course I realize I'm not being very specific at this point, and
that I'm talking about a fairly major project.
rcurl
response 27 of 28: Mark Unseen   May 23 20:29 UTC 2010

As long as it doesn't get fancier (and therefore harder to use) than at
present....
cross
response 28 of 28: Mark Unseen   Jul 11 16:20 UTC 2010

Just do it and see what happens.  No one said we'd have to shut off 
backtalk or fronttalk if there was another conference option available
on  Grex.  Could this be the second system that Mary proposed, or at
least a  prototype of some such thing?
 0-24   25-28         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss