|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 24 new of 48 responses total. |
cross
|
|
response 25 of 48:
|
Feb 5 01:58 UTC 2018 |
Wow. So homophobic.
|
walkman
|
|
response 26 of 48:
|
Feb 10 00:34 UTC 2018 |
Someone is REALLY preoccupied with male sexuality.
LOL!!!
"i don't know which is the most idiot"
We should hold a contest to see who is the "most idiot."
|
tod
|
|
response 27 of 48:
|
Feb 10 01:34 UTC 2018 |
which witch is which
can i be the more idiot
|
mijk
|
|
response 28 of 48:
|
Feb 10 18:50 UTC 2018 |
Being an idiot won't get you laid. ;)
|
tod
|
|
response 29 of 48:
|
Feb 12 04:08 UTC 2018 |
re #28
Whew!
|
tfurrows
|
|
response 30 of 48:
|
Jan 14 00:08 UTC 2019 |
|
walkman
|
|
response 31 of 48:
|
Jan 20 00:21 UTC 2019 |
I know right?
|
walkman
|
|
response 32 of 48:
|
Sep 25 11:49 UTC 2019 |
Impeachment will backfire.
Let's watch it unfold.
|
walkman
|
|
response 33 of 48:
|
Oct 5 23:34 UTC 2019 |
How's it unfolding so far? I wrote that last comment 10 days ago.
Then again since Grex is dead I'm just talking to myself.
Looks like we now know:
1. Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly
eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand
knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This magically before the
whistleblower comes forward with no direct, first hand-hand knowledge.
Do you think this opens the door to endless whistleblowers in the
future? Or will the loophole magically close once impeachment is
concluded? LMAO
2. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has
informed Schiff, the California Democrat and chairman of the
Intelligence Committee, that he will not forward a whistleblower s
complaint to the committee, as required by law.
What is he hiding? That there's nothing of substance?
There is a process for whistleblowers in such situations, one that has
been established by federal law. A whistleblower must first submit a
complaint to the IG, who determines whether it s an urgent concern and
credible. If so, the DNI shall forward the complaint to the
congressional intelligence committees. Why go around the process? ;)
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/18/mystery-adam-
schiff-whistleblower-takes-dangerous-new-turn/
3. Despite the fact that Rep. Adam Schiff claimed otherwise, he met with
the whistleblower before the report became public. Coaching, colluding
and interfering with the 2020 election.
4. One of Schiff s staffers took a trip to Ukraine in August to meet
with and speak to their former president, Petro Poroshenko (strong ties
to Obama Administration). Does conducting a secret meeting with a
foreign leader who was duly replaced by a rival in an election count as
foreign meddling? Pot/Kettle
Speaking of which,a 2016 Politico report indicated that a Democratic
National Committee operative worked with Ukrainian government officials
to dig up Russia-related opposition research on Donald Trump. The
operative later shared that information with the DNC and the Clinton
campaign.
Karl Marx: Accuse your enemy of what you are doing, as you are doing it
to create confusion .
5. 61 percent of Americans oppose impeaching Trump: poll
https://nypost.com/2019/06/12/61-percent-of-americans-oppose-impeaching-
trump-poll/
6. My own conjecture: Once the House votes for impeachment, it will go
to the Senate where it will likely be voted down. Controlled by
Republicans. Trump uses the incident to portray himself as a martyr. His
supporters will crawl over glass and fire to vote for him again. End of
story. Of course, Trump has many neocon enemies in the Senate, so I
could be wrong. Regardless of the outcome, I'm sure my life will not
change in any significant way.
#EatTheBabies for the climate.
|
papa
|
|
response 34 of 48:
|
Oct 6 21:02 UTC 2019 |
resp:33
That sounds about right. The Dems are so obssessed with impeaching Trump,
they are guaranteeing his reelection.
|
walkman
|
|
response 35 of 48:
|
Oct 7 10:50 UTC 2019 |
#34 Democrat voters should be upset. They voted for people who
promised change. All they got were more promises but of impeachment.
What have Democrats done since January 2017? Nothing I know of.
"Oh but Trump will never sign..." would be the excuse.
What happened to "reaching across the isle"? Making deals? That is
what they are there for. Otherwise, why bother voting?
Democrat voters were betrayed by their own party. I wonder if this
will get people thinking about the Democrat Plantation. Just keep
voting and they will keep promising.
When will people finally decide they've had enough and start
exploring third parties? It seems like the lock down on a 2 party
system is tighter that ever.
I've felt from the beginning that Trump isn't a Republican. To me,
he seems like a populist Reagan Republican/Libertarian hybrid.
Definitely not a fundamentalist GOP or neocon; though ignorant (or
disingenuous) critics almost always portray him that way. He
definitely has plenty of room for criticism but an honest approach
always has more impact.
Why are his supporters not asking what happened to the wall? What
about his out of control spending? Space Force - what happened to
smaller government and conservative spending? What about not closing
on those trade deals? Plenty more to discuss. But with the extreme
polarization, no one wants to discuss anything without turning into
a rage monster.
|
papa
|
|
response 36 of 48:
|
Oct 7 13:13 UTC 2019 |
resp:35
I think a two-party system is good, but the US needs two different parties
than the corrupt ones we have now.
|
tod
|
|
response 37 of 48:
|
Oct 12 04:47 UTC 2019 |
June 13, 2013 (Chula Vista) During a visit to Southwestern College in the San
Diego area on Monday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi fielded questions
from local media on Edward Snowden. Snowden has fled the country over fears
of possible espionage charges for leaking classified documents revealing that
the National Security Administration (NSA) has been accessing phone records
for millions of Americans.
The former House Speaker called for a balance between liberty and security...
...She added that if there was someone leaking classified information that
is against the law and that we have a responsibility as a country to balance
security and liberty, privacy and strength.
In her view, we might not like the laws, and may not even not voted for them,
but they are the law.
Asked if she viewed him as a criminal or hero, Pelosi said, No matter who he
is, if he has leaked classified information, thats against the law.
~~~~
Not sure why I dug that up. Maybe because she had that PATRIOT ACT gravy
train for a long time and nothing has changed.
|
cross
|
|
response 38 of 48:
|
Oct 14 14:47 UTC 2019 |
Donald Trump is, truly, the biggest pussy in the history of the US presidency.
This guy is such a goddamn wimp. Erdogan came calling and he rolled over like
a beaten dog.
I'm amazed at the people who think he's some kind of tough guy. Dude's
anything but.
|
walkman
|
|
response 39 of 48:
|
Oct 21 16:42 UTC 2019 |
#38
Worst Hitler ever.
|
lar
|
|
response 40 of 48:
|
Mar 14 01:01 UTC 2020 |
I miss the ole grex days....so many have passed on, janc,rcurl and a few
others.
|
walkman
|
|
response 41 of 48:
|
Mar 15 14:19 UTC 2020 |
I didn't know Rane had died... oof
|
gelinas
|
|
response 42 of 48:
|
Apr 1 05:46 UTC 2020 |
Apparently, he died May 12 of last year. I didn't know it, either.
|
cross
|
|
response 43 of 48:
|
Apr 2 19:23 UTC 2020 |
Very sad. He was an irascible character, but fun to have around.
|
walkman
|
|
response 44 of 48:
|
Apr 2 20:53 UTC 2020 |
I always pictured him in a cardigan sweater and reading glasses.
|
walkman
|
|
response 45 of 48:
|
May 13 23:35 UTC 2020 |
Essential viewing:
https://youtu.be/Imhbncy9RJg
|
tod
|
|
response 46 of 48:
|
Apr 27 04:41 UTC 2022 |
re #45
And nothing has come of it. They got away with it - and even proved
that the Clinton Foundation paid DNC for it.
|
walkman
|
|
response 47 of 48:
|
Apr 27 11:26 UTC 2022 |
From mass hysteria to mass formation psychosis to mass starvation.
Oops I didn't mean to be a spoiler.
"Alexa, what is Martial Law?"
"Alexa, is thing on?"
Watching the left, who often parrots, "it's a private company they can
do what they want, naner-naner" when they support a corporation that
reflects their anti-human, anti-American views melt as a free-speech
proponent buys Twitter. They are against corporate welfare unless it's a
pro-pedo company (Disney) that is about to lose it's tax-free, self-
governing status. Putin is in every bedroom closet, lurking. If you
invoke him, he sits on your chest and steals your oxygen.
|
walkman
|
|
response 48 of 48:
|
Apr 27 11:26 UTC 2022 |
I would take it all with stride, knowing an election is coming and the
fed-up Americans could just exercise their right to kick these ghouls
out. But we all know there's an effective system in place where vote
theft, ballot harvesting and dead people ensure victory, regardless of
actual votes. Question it and you are officially a terrorist who
threatens Democracy.
If you accept that democracy = official subversion of democracy, you
earn social credits and can finally eat.
|