|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 14 new of 38 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 25 of 38:
| 
Mar 26 03:33 UTC 1996 |
I can say that again
that that that that that that that that that that that thatthat that that that
that that that that that that that thatthat that that that that that that that
that that that thatthat that that that that that that that that that that
thatthat that that that that that that that that that that thatthat that that
that that that that that that that that thatthat that that that that that that
that that that that thatthat that that that that that that that that that that
that
I can say that again and again and again
|
scott
|
|
response 26 of 38:
|
Mar 28 17:17 UTC 1996 |
I can say that that again too,
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
that that that that that that that that that that that that that that that
(and I can do it more neatly!)
|
srw
|
|
response 27 of 38:
|
Apr 1 01:53 UTC 1996 |
I didn't know neatness counted.
I liked it better when the accordionists were here.
|
scott
|
|
response 28 of 38:
|
Apr 1 01:55 UTC 1996 |
Well, not much has happened since they left.
(and precision in the area of triviality was *always* admired)
|
srw
|
|
response 29 of 38:
|
Apr 1 06:14 UTC 1996 |
I miss the rodent. And he wasn't even here for very long.
|
brenner
|
|
response 30 of 38:
|
Apr 10 00:08 UTC 1996 |
Thank god, the rodent was not ever here. We are safe.
One small place in cyberspace is safe from his
hamster-like clutches.
|
selena
|
|
response 31 of 38:
|
Apr 28 13:15 UTC 1996 |
*Selena's non-hampster-like clutches hugs Brenner TIHGT!>
|
brenner
|
|
response 32 of 38:
|
May 12 04:17 UTC 1996 |
Ouch! ^G!
|
orinoco
|
|
response 33 of 38:
|
Mar 23 03:54 UTC 1998 |
I feel left out. I have never basked in the radiant glow of the great rodent.
Assuming, of course, that said rodent actually has a radiant glow.
One never knows, do one?
|
brenner
|
|
response 34 of 38:
|
Mar 23 07:05 UTC 1998 |
He/she/or it would glow if properly lit.
|
raven
|
|
response 35 of 38:
|
Mar 23 17:16 UTC 1998 |
Lit by illuminations or gasoline?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 36 of 38:
|
Mar 23 17:33 UTC 1998 |
Perhaps electric power would suffice?
|
srw
|
|
response 37 of 38:
|
Mar 25 05:39 UTC 1998 |
neither illumination nor gasoline but probably flammable, though not on
fire.
|
font
|
|
response 38 of 38:
|
Mar 29 08:37 UTC 1998 |
fire, fire, <heh heh heh> fire fire...sayeth the rodent.
<scurry scurry, doith the rodent>
|
