|
Grex > Accordions > #116: Discuss (disguss), rave(n) about birds....fontly did it! |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 23 new of 47 responses total. |
otaking
|
|
response 25 of 47:
| 
Apr 19 12:18 UTC 1997 |
If the cavalry are custard, what flavor are they?
/
|
font
|
|
response 26 of 47:
|
Apr 20 02:57 UTC 1997 |
purple?
|
brenner
|
|
response 27 of 47:
|
Apr 23 07:28 UTC 1997 |
Sorry Boss! I wdn't even dream of it.
Honest.
|
font
|
|
response 28 of 47:
|
Apr 23 17:35 UTC 1997 |
Well, dreams are either junk, or an extention of ourselves. What'll it be?
|
otaking
|
|
response 29 of 47:
|
Apr 26 12:32 UTC 1997 |
I think that dreams are extensions of ourselves. I'd rather interpret them
than forget them. Dreams are cool and fun to remember. Analysis helps you
pay attention to the details.
|
font
|
|
response 30 of 47:
|
Apr 26 18:46 UTC 1997 |
Yea, but can you saunter up to a bar and order that?
|
otaking
|
|
response 31 of 47:
|
Apr 28 12:29 UTC 1997 |
It depends. Are you buying?
|
font
|
|
response 32 of 47:
|
Apr 28 21:23 UTC 1997 |
entropy for one.
|
otaking
|
|
response 33 of 47:
|
Apr 29 11:59 UTC 1997 |
I think I'll head to the bar and order one myself.
BTW, do you realixe that if Texas becomes its own country, Chuck Norris
would be a foreign actor?
|
font
|
|
response 34 of 47:
|
Apr 30 06:47 UTC 1997 |
And then we would have had a forgeiner for president....good ol' georgie...
<bronx cheer>
|
otaking
|
|
response 35 of 47:
|
May 5 12:48 UTC 1997 |
Since a president has to be a natural citizen, wouldn't that invalidate his
entire presidency?
|
font
|
|
response 36 of 47:
|
May 5 20:36 UTC 1997 |
That's what they want you to think. It never happened. Or perhaps we could
empeach him as an ex-president. "George, you can't be an ex-president. Now,
undo everything that your administration ever did, on the double!"
|
otaking
|
|
response 37 of 47:
|
May 7 12:16 UTC 1997 |
Considering that, let's throw California out of the US so we can invalidate
Reagan's presidency too.
|
font
|
|
response 38 of 47:
|
May 8 04:40 UTC 1997 |
As bad as he was, at least then people wern't so damn compliant.
I almost think the current administration is worse. You don't know
who'se side Buddy Bill <wince> is on. With Regan, at least,
the direction was clear and there was a strong voice against him.
NOw were all wishy-washy...at least public opinion is.....
and it's kind of funny...because now public oppinion for what it's worth
is siding with regan.....<shivver>
|
raven
|
|
response 39 of 47:
|
May 8 13:39 UTC 1997 |
True they used to call Raygun the teflon president, but I think "Slick
Willy," is the true teflon man. Raygun at least would make some true
gaffers like "seen one Redwood you've seen them all," after statements
like that membership in environmental groups would soar (same situation
for civil rights etc). With slick willy it's like everythings OK we're
taking care of it, GO BACK TO SLEEP. <sigh>
|
otaking
|
|
response 40 of 47:
|
May 12 11:56 UTC 1997 |
I think we all inhaled before voting for him (like the alternatives were any
better).
|
mdw
|
|
response 41 of 47:
|
May 15 10:37 UTC 1997 |
I voted for Ralph Nader.
|
raven
|
|
response 42 of 47:
|
May 15 19:06 UTC 1997 |
I voted for Ralph as well...
|
font
|
|
response 43 of 47:
|
May 18 03:14 UTC 1997 |
ditto....
|
otaking
|
|
response 44 of 47:
|
May 21 11:54 UTC 1997 |
Okay, so by voting for Clinton, I'm actually in the minority here. Not only
am I thrilled by that, and the fact you didn't choose Dole, I didn't see a
viable alternative that stood any chance of winning. Even Perot couldn't
get too many votes. Ah, if we only had a more parliamentary form of goverment
like in Britain. Then the Republic of Texas could have voted separatists into
Congress. That would`ve been entertaining.
|
font
|
|
response 45 of 47:
|
May 31 21:17 UTC 1997 |
Yeah, at least intertainment comes from parliment's antics politically as well
as their personal lives, as opposed to here....<snore>
|
otaking
|
|
response 46 of 47:
|
Jun 1 08:21 UTC 1997 |
Yea, like who REALLY cares about the Paula Jones trial when you compare it
to nuclear disarmament or NATO negotiations? The media were more concerned
with what Bill does in hotel rooms than in an international conference.
That's just wrong. And compared to British sex scandals, downright boring.
|
font
|
|
response 47 of 47:
|
Jun 6 00:53 UTC 1997 |
AGgreed! This country is really screwed up informationally speaking.
|