You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-39         
 
Author Message
15 new of 39 responses total.
albaugh
response 25 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 17 22:34 UTC 2000

I have, on occasion, thank you.  But this item's contents will constitute
nothing more than a curious and unpleasant spillage on the language
conference's carpet.
davel
response 26 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 17 23:58 UTC 2000

heh
twinkie
response 27 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 03:01 UTC 2000

Well, since this is linked to the Language conference, I'd like to take this
opportunity to say....wait for it....Eat a bag of shitdicks!

rcurl
response 28 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 06:35 UTC 2000

Thank you for the contribution, which I presume represents the epitomy of
your intelligence. 
twinkie
response 29 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 10:50 UTC 2000

Mom! Rane called me a dummy!

Shouldn't you be prattling about puerile doltery?

md
response 30 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 14:34 UTC 2000

Is "epitomy" the epitome of Rane's intelligence?
rcurl
response 31 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 15:58 UTC 2000

"epitomy" is the excision of an epit, dummy. 
lelande
response 32 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 18 21:10 UTC 2000

aka, engineering process improvement team.
(teradyne)
kami
response 33 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 03:39 UTC 2000

Oh! Rane, you beat me to it. Oh well.
orinoco
response 34 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 03:04 UTC 2000

Isn't it "epitome," says the guy reading this from the language conference.
rcurl
response 35 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 05:13 UTC 2000

Go back five squares.
albaugh
response 36 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 23:31 UTC 2000

epitome is like a poem to be read out-of-doors or soemthing...
cwb
response 37 of 39: Mark Unseen   Aug 3 18:13 UTC 2000

To return to the original topic, it is also the case that not all
children are fools.  Some children I know are much wiser than the
"grownups" they hang out with.  Goddess grant they don't get convinced
to buy into the removal of that wisdom.
mooncat
response 38 of 39: Mark Unseen   Aug 3 18:56 UTC 2000

Nah, they'll just use it for devious reasons. ;)
albaugh
response 39 of 39: Mark Unseen   Aug 3 23:35 UTC 2000

"Fool" is best left to describe only those that should know better.  There
are many things that it is not reasonable for kids yet to know.
 0-24   25-39         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss