You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 223-247   248-272   273-297   298-322   323-347   348-372   373-397   398-422   423-424 
 
Author Message
25 new of 424 responses total.
jp2
response 248 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 23:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 249 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 00:00 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

richard
response 250 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 01:56 UTC 2004

that is forcing staff to do all the scribbling of jep and valerie's items.
wouldn't they have to be logged on as "valerie" to scribble valerie's items?
I note that when I posted an item from mnet on grex in an agora item where
we were discussing whether user's owned their own words, and it was decided
to remove that post, that marcus (who took the action) did not scribble it,
he went in and edited the post and put xxx's through everything.  Can staff
actually "scribble" a post of another user without being logged on as that
user?  If staff would have to use root and edit each individual post and take
out the words one by one, that would take a lot of time.  Why pass such a
proposal unless its clear that somebody on staff is willing to volunteer to
take the time to do all that work?
jp2
response 251 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 02:31 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 252 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 03:34 UTC 2004

And John Remmers has volunteered to do the grunt work.
jp2
response 253 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 14:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

mary
response 254 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 15:15 UTC 2004

Please consider removing all but what was part three.  That
last is more editorial comment and doesn't belong in the
motion.
jp2
response 255 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 15:48 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

willcome
response 256 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 15:53 UTC 2004

I'd like to thank naftee for brining this matter to our attention.
jp2
response 257 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 15:53 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 258 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:07 UTC 2004

Hi, this is your friendly voteadm person again.

The wording in Section 1 of #255 is acceptable, although I don't
think Section 2 is necessary and could give a misleading impression.
By default, policies take effect as soon as a passing result is
announced, and staff is always supposed to implement policies as
soon as practical.  Having that language in the proposal suggests
that those things are not the default.  Jamie, are you willing
to take that part out?

It appears that for the first time in Grex history we might be
voting on more than one proposal at the same time.  The current
vote program can handle that okay with a minor amount of
hack-work on my part, but I'm working on a rewrite that will
handle parallel votes with different expiration times gracefully,
and that will automate some things that I currently do by hand.  
I'd like to delay the start of voting until tomorrow (Saturday)
to see if I can get that operational.  If I do, I'll start the
vote using the new program; if not, I'll start it using the old
one.  Hopefully that's acceptable to folks.
jp2
response 259 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:14 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 260 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:32 UTC 2004

Thanks for the willingness to be flexible.

Refresh my memory -- was more that one staff member involved in
deleting the items?  The proposal refers to "staff members".
jp2
response 261 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:43 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 262 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 04:25 UTC 2004

I would also like to thank willcome and jp2 for their tireless efforts in
discussing the matter with the users of GreX.
ryan
response 263 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 16:38 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 264 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 17:27 UTC 2004

Re #261: You can avoid naming names and still be factually accurate.
remmers
response 265 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 22:02 UTC 2004

To clarify:  I think the wording in #259 is okay except that the
phrase "by staff members" is contrary to fact.  Simplest fix would
be to leave it out.  Once that's fixed, I'll start a vote whenever
Jamie says.  Other things came up this weekend that slowed down work
on the new vote program, and I doubt I'll have a chance to work on
it again until next weekend, so in the interest of expediting 
a decision it may be best to start the vote under the old program.
jp2
response 266 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 01:11 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 267 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 02:26 UTC 2004

(That only works if the bill is sure to pass, jp2.  You know that.  Except
in the case of "poison pill" riders, which are added to ensure the basic bill
does NOT pass.)
jp2
response 268 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 10:54 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 269 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 11:06 UTC 2004

When I start seeing some kickbacks for my efforts, I'll give more
serious consideration to imitating shady legislative practices.  But
darn it, Jamie didn't offer me any bribes at all.  You get what you
pay for.  :)

Okay, I'll start the voting either later today or first thing
tomorrow.
jp2
response 270 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 11:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

bhoward
response 271 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 13:17 UTC 2004

That ought to buy you some creamer for your Starbucks latte, James.
jp2
response 272 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 14:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 223-247   248-272   273-297   298-322   323-347   348-372   373-397   398-422   423-424 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss