You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 217-241   242-266   267-291   292-316   317-341   342-366   367-391   392-405   
 
Author Message
25 new of 405 responses total.
keesan
response 242 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 9 21:44 UTC 2004

The following (without any message body) was in my inbox when I got home
today at 17:30 (May 9).  I am sure I did not send it.  Who did?   Is this
some new virus?  No attachment either.


Received: from host217-42-224-55.range217-42.btcentralplus.com
(host217-42-224-55.range217-42.btcentralplus.com [217.42.224.55]) by
grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA13675 for
<keesan@grex.org>; Sun, 9 May 2004 16:32:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 May 2004
16:32:50 -0400 From: Sindi Keesan <keesan@grex.org> Message-Id:
<200405092032.QAA13675@grex.cyberspace.org> Received: from i[8 Apparently-To:
<keesan@grex.org>

jor
response 243 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 00:19 UTC 2004

        There seems to be a rash of new email/spam/virus
        crap, with bogus attachments and ruses like
        imitation email error messages, et cetera.

        'your email to IncreaseViagraSize.com
        failed' . . wait I sent no such email.

        I am thinking about making a list of the 
        symptoms.
albaugh
response 244 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 18:13 UTC 2004

Recent viruses are being sent spoofing the From: address.  This makes it
more likely to spread, as the unsuspecting - and inexperienced! - recipient
will say "How nice, a message from Sindi, I'll just open her attachment"
expecting to see an image of flowers or something, and instead...
keesan
response 245 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 18:35 UTC 2004

I know about the Netsky virus spoofing the address and coming with a 40K
attachment, but this had no attachment and it was from me to me and also had
no message body.  Odd.  
tod
response 246 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 18:40 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

drew
response 247 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 19:24 UTC 2004

I also have gotten mail from myself. One a normal spam, and the other devoid
of any text or attachment, saved in /a/d/r/drew/selfmail. I was going to
change my password but since others are also getting mail from themselves -
what the heck, I'm changing it anyway.
scott
response 248 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 10 19:28 UTC 2004

A really recent virus even has a couple photos of sexy women embedded, to be
used to entice the victim into opening the attachment.
jor
response 249 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 00:30 UTC 2004


        I assume malicious attachments are targeting
        Windows email programs. Are there now malicious
        email attachments which can do damage
        on Unix?

        I don't want to open one to find out.
jhudson
response 250 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 14:40 UTC 2004

There are, but just opening one won't do any damage.
It is hard to get a virus when you have to:

(save file)
$ chmod +x file
$ ./file
keesan
response 251 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 15:03 UTC 2004

I also get 'antivirus warning report' type subjects from the grex MAILERDAEMON
which I presume is also a forget from address.  Can't check, it already went
to /dev/null.
gull
response 252 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 15:10 UTC 2004

There was, for a while, a buffer overflow bug in Pine that would allow a
specially-crafted email message to execute arbitrary code.  I don't know
of any worms that successfully exploited it, though.
tod
response 253 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 16:18 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 254 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 16:52 UTC 2004

resp:242, 245: Sindi: yeah, those are going around, null emails which 
claim to be "From:" the address receiving them.  I have a few and 
have reports of others.  What this means is that the Quality Assurance
department in Virusland is slacking off on the job; you have received
the output from an incompetently written virus.
albaugh
response 255 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 17:10 UTC 2004

While telnetting in late last night, with minimal activity over a span of ~3
hours, I lost my connection 3 or 4 times.  Is that acceptable for a system
such as grex?  If not, is this situation chronic?  Correctable?  Something
that would be in any way better under nextgrex?
tod
response 256 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 17:19 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gull
response 257 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 20:38 UTC 2004

Re resp:255: It looks like it's going to be chronic until someone on
staff has time to fix it.
tod
response 258 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 20:44 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod
response 259 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 11 22:45 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 260 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 03:40 UTC 2004

Is grex off the internet again?
tod
response 261 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 04:55 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

realugly
response 262 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 05:03 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

bru
response 263 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 13:03 UTC 2004

Macdonalds is humiliating?  And what does this have to do with system problems
?  I just got booted again.
realugly
response 264 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 13:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

soup
response 265 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 12 14:34 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

realugly
response 266 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 13 12:32 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 217-241   242-266   267-291   292-316   317-341   342-366   367-391   392-405   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss