You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 213-237   238-260         
 
Author Message
23 new of 260 responses total.
jep
response 238 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:07 UTC 2006

I had Grex removed from comcast.net's blacklist by sending them an e-
mail, so sometimes it can be done.  I also had Sterling Commerce, my 
employer, removed from their blacklist.
bru
response 239 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:54 UTC 2006

I guess the point is that tehr is no harm in trying to speak with these people
adn get the blacklist removed.  All they can do is say No.  One has to ask.
keesan
response 240 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:56 UTC 2006

Can an ISP that is using the sorbs blacklist whitelist grex so grex mail gets
through the sorbs filter?  Are there any grexers who are also paying AOL?
tod
response 241 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:59 UTC 2006

Why would someone whitelist Grex which allows email abuse?
keesan
response 242 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:13 UTC 2006

How is grex allowing email abuse?
bru
response 243 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:32 UTC 2006

because we do not verify people who log in, and our staff does not take action
to halt abuse in a quick and efficient manner.
tod
response 244 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:45 UTC 2006

re #242
Grex allows email attachments which may include viruses and overall allows
anyone to log into grex and send spam unchecked out to the masses (thus
causing these blacklist problems.)
rcurl
response 245 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:46 UTC 2006

Grex is going to start (or already is) losing members - *supporting* members
- if it isn't apparent that eveything possible is being done to allow Grex
users access to these blocking ISPs. I have the impression that some users
here just think this funny. I wonder how many donating members do?
tod
response 246 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 21:01 UTC 2006

I'm a donating member and I think resistance is futile.  Email woes are a flea
the old Grex dog can't scratch.  So..get rid of Internet e-mail or else figure
out how to sub it out to another ISP that will do the hard labor more
efficiently....
kingjon
response 247 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 21:04 UTC 2006

Your first suggestion has already been adopted as a stopgap measure.

tod
response 248 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 21:17 UTC 2006

Well..that should pretty much remedy it I would think.
slynne
response 249 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 23:54 UTC 2006

When it comes to being a provider of email, grex has some issues. One of
them is that our open door policy has led us to be blacklisted. It might
be true that will lead us to lose some paying members. It is too bad.
But if we were to change our open newuser policy, we would lose members
too. 

However, I think the staff are doing a really find job dealing wtih this
email thing and while it might not get us off blacklists we are
currently on, it might prevent us from being added to more. 

i
response 250 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 23:58 UTC 2006

Given that several of the blacklists appear to be IP#-based, how much
good might it do if we moved to another block of IP #'s with Provide.net,
vs. how much hassle would it be do that?
keesan
response 251 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 01:06 UTC 2006

Is anyone still working on a way to limit outgoing mail to non-members and
allowing new users to have outgoing mail again?  IT is not stop-gap if it
lasts indefinitely.
jep
response 252 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 02:21 UTC 2006

I'm a contributor.  E-mail isn't important to me as a function of Grex,
not any more.  I'm sorry we can't really provide it any more, but it is
clear we can't do a good job at it these days.  Fortunately there are
alternatives.
tsty
response 253 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 06:37 UTC 2006

excuse me for speaking up, but, grex has a mission that is severely
compromised, yet again, by *some* sort of .... something.
  
free access, free email, free confrencing, free party, free unix.
  
to me, those are not too difficult to maintain/sustain. 
  
we have lost *old* email and now we are losing *new* email.
  
sombody(ies) "in charge" has/have a serious task to accomplish.
  
hell, even keesan  and rcurl are bitching up a strum&drang. what next?
  
 

rcurl
response 254 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 06:44 UTC 2006

Maybe it needs to be determined what fraction of current supporters would be
lost with the end of reliable e-mail. If it is minor, then why not just give
up e-mail as a service to anyone? Lots more memory and faster processing for
everything else users do. 
bru
response 255 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 12:50 UTC 2006

follow m-nets lead?
keesan
response 256 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 13:49 UTC 2006

Putting on a spam filter would free up a great deal of memory.
tod
response 257 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 19:59 UTC 2006

Spam Cop and throttled outbound SMTP would help a ton but who is going to
maintain and configure it system-wide from the staff?
rcurl
response 258 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 20:08 UTC 2006

Staff?

Inre #254: of course Grex doesn't have to abandon e-mail between its users,
but outbound e-mail is now so compromised by  not having access to AOL and
other servers that it might as well be abandoned. Then Grex can be honest
about the services it offers.
keesan
response 259 of 260: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 22:14 UTC 2006

Someone tried twice to send me an email and it got bounced back due to 'too
much traffic'.  Grex is not the best place to receive mail either.
wilt
response 260 of 260: Mark Unseen   May 16 23:51 UTC 2006

HACKED BY GNAA LOL JEWS DID WTC LOL
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 213-237   238-260         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss