You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 211-235   236-248         
 
Author Message
13 new of 248 responses total.
davel
response 236 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 16 20:56 UTC 2002

For whatever it's worth:  I send (from off site) several messages a day to
a couple of people on Grex.  From the system where I send them, I see them
hanging in the queue for long periods.  Usually the error message given is
  Deferred: Connection timed out with grex.cyberspace.org.
but sometimes it is
  Deferred: Interrupted system call

Given what's been said, I assume that it times out because there are too many
of these half-open connections.  But I have to wonder if the "Interrupted
system call" error doesn't occur because I somehow get a half-open connection.
At any rate, I thought I'd mention this message.
dang
response 237 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 02:42 UTC 2002

resp:235 That depends on how the particular kernel detects SYN floods. 
I would classify "sevaral" half open connections at at time from the
same IP as a SYN flood.  How you define "several" depends on the system
and it's load, I suppose.

Many kernels have tunable SYN timeouts, which could be useful here. 
Time them out quicker.  (Incidentally, my Linux 2.4 box has a max of
1024 backloged SYNs.)
mdw
response 238 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 06:02 UTC 2002

The half-open connections are typically from several *different* IP
addresses.  So, anything that thinks a syn flood comes from one IP
address isn't going to recognize this.  Another technique is just to
randomly close out several connections in the middle of the queue - that
would work better here, but would probably also randomly trash real
connections that were too slow to complete.

"Interrupted system call" isn't something grex can create directly.
This would result from an interrupt caused by some event on the remote
end (such as alarm(2)) that caused a system call to be aborted.
Probably that means something was too slow at grex's end, although that
seems difficult to believe, tcp & standard smtp timeouts are pretty big.
Perhaps it means something quite different.
russ
response 239 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 03:28 UTC 2002

I just got a piece of mail, delivered 2-something Wednesday morning.
It had been sent at 6:08 AM on Monday. 

I got another piece of mail, delivered 3:30 PM Wednesday afternoon.
It had been sent about 7 PM *last Saturday night*.

This mail-refusal problem is way out of hand.  Something Must Be Done.
gelinas
response 240 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 03:47 UTC 2002

Russ, can you look at the Received: lines and tell where it got hung up?
jep
response 241 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 14:22 UTC 2002

Grex is running really slowly.  The load average is down to around 6 right
now, but was up to 19+.
keesan
response 242 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 15:29 UTC 2002

Still running slowly, on and off.  I waited close to a minute to open my
mailbox with Pine (100 plus message, I admit).  BBS is okay.
russ
response 243 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:50 UTC 2002

(trying again after crash during upload)

The hangups are getting to Grex; what else?  Here are the headers,
with some info abridged.

Received: from FOREIGN.SYSTEM (FOREIGN.SYSTEM [NNN.NNN.NNN.NN]) by
grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id CAA17563 for
<russ@cyberspace.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:41:57 -0500 Received: (qmail 13305
invoked by uid 0); 16 Dec 2002 11:13:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO
OTHER.SYSTEM) (unknown)
  by unknown with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 11:13:00 -0000
Received: from OTHER.SYSTEM (IDENT:25@localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by OTHER.SYSTEM (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBGBAn6k019152;
        Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:10:50 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
        by OTHER.SYSTEM (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBGB8n3o018402;
        Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:08:49 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:08:49 -0500

From USER@SOMESITE.COM Wed Dec 18 15:31:51 2002
Received: from ashd1-2.relay.mail.uu.net (ashd1-2.relay.mail.uu.net
[199.171.54.246]) by grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA05636
for <russ@cyberspace.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:31:49 -0500 Received: from
smtp.SOMESITE.COM by mr1.ash.ops.us.uu.net with SMTP 
        (peer crosschecked as: SMTP.SOMESITE.COM [NN.NNN.NNN.NNN])
        id QQntgq19875
        for <russ@cyberspace.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:11:46 GMT
Received: from Connect2 Message Router by smtp.SOMESITE.COM
        via Connect2-SMTP 4.32; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:17:31 -0500
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:06:00 -0500

As you can see the first message took more than 44 hours to make the
last hop to Grex; the second took 6 minutes to get to uu.net (note
the time change from EST to GMT, and that the clock at the message
router is fast), and then it took until Wednesday afternoon to get
to Grex (over 92 hours).

That's pretty pathetic.  You could get a message round-trip to
Pioneer 11 in about half that time.
gull
response 244 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 00:07 UTC 2002

Reminds me of sending stuff via packet radio.  If it arrived faster than
snail mail, it was a good day.
gelinas
response 245 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 00:39 UTC 2002

Thanks, Russ.
krj
response 246 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 18:44 UTC 2002

The RoadRunner ISP has decided to block mail from Grex because
they think Grex is offering an open proxy server.
 
----------
From daemon Fri Dec 20 02:27:07 2002
Received: from localhost (localhost) by grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12)
with internal id CAA19965; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:27:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Dec
2002 02:27:06 -0500 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
<MAILER-DAEMON@cyberspace.org> Subject: Returned mail: Remote protocol error
Message-Id: <200212200727.CAA19965@grex.cyberspace.org> To: krj@cyberspace.org
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="CAA19965.1040369226/grex.cyberspace.org" Status: R

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--CAA19965.1040369226/grex.cyberspace.org

The original message was received at Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:27:01 -0500
from krj@localhost

   ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
XXXXXX@austin.rr.com  (unrecoverable error)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to txmx01.mgw.rr.com.:
>>> MAIL From:<krj@cyberspace.org>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.93.104.34 - See http://security.rr.com/mai
l_blocks.htm#proxy
... while talking to txmx02.mgw.rr.com.:
>>> MAIL From:<krj@cyberspace.org>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.93.104.34 - See http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#proxy
----------

... and etc down a whole list of mail servers.
tpryan
response 247 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 20:15 UTC 2002

(remmers will now probably remind us how he used to send packets
by carrier pigeon, and his ISP number was 3).
tsty
response 248 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 22 08:05 UTC 2002

2
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 211-235   236-248         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss