|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 378 responses total. |
edina
|
|
response 22 of 378:
|
Mar 3 23:48 UTC 2006 |
Apparently not.
|
tod
|
|
response 23 of 378:
|
Mar 4 00:20 UTC 2006 |
Lynne, I hope you go to see a doc for a checkup and listen to everything the
doc says. You don't have to believe the doc or anything, but at least you
can get some data on how you're doing. I go to the doc every 2 years at
least. He's my age. He tells me "Hey, you know..I've got another patient
about your build and he started the Atkins and lost 60 lbs and he feels great
and his good cholesterol levels improved." So I did Atkins and now I'm back
to low calorie nutrition just cuz its better on my skin. I totally know I'm
overweight and that its bad for my long term health. I'm doing what I
can...lots of walking and eating a couple apples and yogurts every day along
with tons of water..and yea I have a decent meal for dinner or lunch depending
on my hunger. The big thing for me is keeping the kitchen and my work
backpack supplied with nutritious stuff and making sure I get out to walk to
relieve stress and enjoysunshine, etc etc etc
8 years is too long. Please go get a checkup. I'm not judging you or
anything but I'm just advising you cuz at our age we can't afford to slack
off from the doc more than maybe 3 years at a time. History of smoking and
being overweight is nothing to take lightly.
|
keesan
|
|
response 24 of 378:
|
Mar 4 01:47 UTC 2006 |
Jim was told that his cholesterol was too low (145 total) so he started eating
eggs and cheese once in a while. 160 is supposed to be ideal. I have not
bothered measuring mine. Changing the types of things you eat affects your
weight without trying to diet. I weighed 20 lb more when I ate school food,
which was always greasy and had a lot of desserts.
My grandmother was obese all her life and died at about age 70 of diabetes.
Nobody else in the large family has had diabetes. I have one neighbor,
overeight, with diabetes, who was told to lose weight and it would get better.
|
slynne
|
|
response 25 of 378:
|
Mar 4 03:28 UTC 2006 |
resp:21 - It is reasonable for a doctor to tell a patient to eat a
healthy diet and to exercise. It is not reasonable for a doctor to tell
a patient to lose weight especially when 95% of the people who go on
diets to lose weight end up putting it back on which probably is
harmful. It isnt even reasonable for a doctor to assume that an
overweight patient doesnt already eat a healthy diet or exercise.
resp:23 - I have an appointment for March 27. I have some books I might
bring with me though including _The Diet Myth_ by Paul Campos. And I
know that doctors dont know everything and have their own biases
including bias against fat people. If I dont like the doctor, I'll fire
her and get another. On a side note, I am kind of bummed that the health
center at EMU doesnt take my insurance because when I went there a
couple of years ago to get some Zoloft they were really respectful. When
it was time to be weighed and I hesitated, the doctor suggested that I
get on the scale backwards so I wouldnt see the number. She said that it
is more important to focus on behavior like eating well and exercising
than a number on a scale. I think more and more doctors are coming
around to that way of thinking. FWIW, smoking is WAY worse for a person
than being fat.
resp:24 - Well, heck..if we are going to bring anecdotal evidence into
this. Out of my four grandparents, three died at the age of 88. All
three were of normal weight their entire adult lives. One of them
developed type 2 diabetes when he was in his seventies. My one living
grandparent, who is currently well into her nineties, is obese and was
fat her entire life. She has lost some weight in the past couple of
years but that is very common with older people. She has never had
diabetes or cancer. She has a heart problem but I am going to go out on
a limb here and say that it has more to do with her age than her weight.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 26 of 378:
|
Mar 4 07:34 UTC 2006 |
I didn't say that a doctor should tell a patient they should lose weight
(though it is a reasonable thing for a doctor to do). Because of your
sensitivity to the subject of losing weight I said "Isn't it reasonable
for a doctor to tell people....... what their most healthy weight would
be?" Then you can decide what you will do about it (but don't blame the
doctor if you get sick).
I don't understand the argument that doctors should not tell patients to
lose weight because the patient will inevitably (really?) gain it back
again. That sounds like the patient intends to gain it back again. After
all, if one goes through the trouble of losing weight, it is less trouble
to keep it off.
Re #24: I am surprised that Jim's doctor thinks a cholesterol level of 145
is too low. Mine is 135 and my doctor is delighted.
|
furs
|
|
response 27 of 378:
|
Mar 4 11:56 UTC 2006 |
re 25. Go see Dr. Thiry in AA. he's awesome. I went there when I
was at my heaviest and I think he handled it the way it should be
done. He just said after my annual physical that I was very healthy
and that at some point my weight might become a factor and if I ever
wanted his help, just to ask. He never brought it up again after
that, until I did. I love that guy.
I think generally if you are over weight, you can be healthy, and I
have been living proof of that. I think there are lots of overweight
people who are healthier than some thin people. However, if you are
over weight and can't walk up a flight of stairs without being winded,
you might want to focus on some exercise.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 28 of 378:
|
Mar 4 12:53 UTC 2006 |
You'd be winded too Jeanne if you had 100lbs on your back and carried it
up a flight of stairs! ;)
|
slynne
|
|
response 29 of 378:
|
Mar 4 13:58 UTC 2006 |
resp:26 Doctors are not supposed to advise people to do things that will
harm them. Studies have shown that a stable weight is more healthy than
a weight that goes up and down. Studies on weight loss show that 95% of
the people who lose weight gain it back. It is not more trouble to keep
it off than it is to lose it. Trust me, we live in a fat phobic society
where fat people are not treated well so people have a seriously
powerful motivation other than their health to lose weight and keep it
off. I would say that with that kind of failure rate, only the most
dedicated people manage to lose weight and keep it off. So it is more
like race or gender than you might think. It isnt something people have
that much control over. It is, however, something people like to think
they have a lot of control over. This is why I say that a doctor telling
a patient to lose weight is very much like a doctor telling a patient
to change their race or gender for health reasons.
As for telling a patient what their ideal weight should be and then
letting them decide. How would a doctor know what that patient's ideal
weight should be? A BMI chart? Those are very flawed. The idea that
there is just one "right" weight is flawed. There isnt even all that
much evidence that being less than a 100 lbs overweight causes one to
have any health issues at all. Oh sure, there are studies that show a
correlation between being overweight and bad health. But there are
studies that show that black people tend to have poorer health than
white people, that less educated people have poorer health than more
educated people, that people in lower socio-economic groups have poorer
health than people in higher socio-economic groups. My thought,
sometimes, is that it is the stress of living in a fat-phobic culture
that could be the cause of increased health problems of overweight
people and that it isnt the actual weight that is the problem
resp:27 I did consider going to Dr Thiry. But ultimately I decided that
I would really prefer a woman doctor. Re stairs, here is what I dont get
about stairs. I can go up one flight of stairs, no problem. Two flights
and I get only very slightly winded but three flights and I am *winded*
It goes from totally fine to panting really suddenly. Never could figure
that out.
|
furs
|
|
response 30 of 378:
|
Mar 4 14:05 UTC 2006 |
re 28. I have had that in the past.
re 29. That's because you're starting to reach your capacity with
your lungs. What would be interesting it to check your heart rate
after each flight to see how much it increases.
|
slynne
|
|
response 31 of 378:
|
Mar 4 14:13 UTC 2006 |
hmmm. I never thought of checking my heart rate after each flight.
Sounds like a good lunch time project at work ;)
|
slynne
|
|
response 32 of 378:
|
Mar 4 14:15 UTC 2006 |
except there are only two flights of stairs to go up there. I'll need to
go to a taller building. I sometimes wonder if the two flight thing is
related to the fact that usually the only stairs I climb are at work so
I have gotten used to going up two flights.
|
mary
|
|
response 33 of 378:
|
Mar 4 14:53 UTC 2006 |
My 2 cents: I don't need to see morbidity statistics to see the
correlation between obesity and illness. I see it daily. I see the 25
year old 300 pound (but otherwise healthy) woman who presents post
appendenctomy where the wound wouldn't close. She'll have months
and months of potent antibiotics, painful wound irrigation and packing,
and eventual scarring. And that's if all goes well. I see the obese
patient who thinks he is doing just fine (avoiding routine physicals)
right up to the point where they suddenly can't seem to "get enough air".
When the chest xray is done it's discovered there is already profound
cardiomegaly, secondary to the strain that extra weight has put on the
heart. Irreversible cardiomegaly. Get a cold and lay around on the
couch for two or three days and your risk for a lethal PE goes way up
if you are 100 pounds overweight. And on, and on.
You quote the stastic that 95% of all diets fail. Is that true for
those in the catagory of morbidly obese who enter a structured
program under medical supervision?
|
slynne
|
|
response 34 of 378:
|
Mar 4 16:41 UTC 2006 |
If you know of a study of morbidly obese patients who enter a structured
weight loss program where the success rate was better than 95% over a
five year period, please share it. I tried to find one via google but
wasnt able to. The only weight loss method that I found that had better
success rate was gastric bypass surgury (and that was on a website put
up by people who do gastic bypass surguries).
There are health risks associated with severe obesity, especially if a
person is more than a hundred pounds overweight (as I am). I dont doubt
that severe obesity even causes some things like joint pain just like I
dont doubt for a minute that excess body fat is a complication in
surgury. I havent ever heard about the PE thing from sitting on a couch
for a couple of days but that doesnt surprise me. But since the failure
rate for diets is so high and because dieting causes health problems of
its own, telling people to lose weight is not good medicine imho. People
should be encouraged to be as healthy as they can be at whatever weight
they happen to be. (some of those healthy behaviors might cause some
patients to lose weight and that is great but it is the healthy
behaviors that should be the focus)
I also have seen statistics that show that obese people are less likely
to seek regular preventative health services. Based on my own experience
and on what I have heard a lot of other fat people say, it is likely
that is due to way doctors and nurses often treat fat people. Even when
the doctors and nurses are completely professional, they still often
share our culture's idea that it is immoral to be fat and that can come
out in subtle ways.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 35 of 378:
|
Mar 4 21:37 UTC 2006 |
First of all, I'm skeptical of your repeated reference to the 95% failure
rate. Is it really failure if there's SOME regain, if ultimately there is
still a reduction? I guess I'd defer to Mary on this one.
Do you also realize that you are essentially lumping the obese in with
children and the elderly in terms of cost exteralization? Our society
willingly pays greater costs for those groups (as compared to the average
person) presumably because there is a sense that they are not as able as
others to be responsible for their health needs. Overweight people impose
similar costs on society, much like smokers. If the failure rate for
quitting smoking was 95% would you also suggest that society should just
give up on trying to motivate smokers to quit and stop externalizing the
costs of their addiction on society?
|
slynne
|
|
response 36 of 378:
|
Mar 4 22:54 UTC 2006 |
resp:35
I first read that statistic in "The Obesity Myth" (aka "The Diet Myth")
by Paul Campos. I gave my copy away though but it was my impression that
yes, 95% (give or take depending on the study) of participants gained
back all of the weight they had lost or were actually heavier than when
they started. The current book I am reading which was writting by a
couple of eating disorder experts mentions it too but doesnt cite
specific studies, unlike Campos.
No, I am lumping obese people in with everyone else who has something
about them that is a health risk that either would be impossible to
nearly impossible to change. I remember my health econ prof, while
talking about health studies and evidence based medicine, mentioning
that being male is a huge health risk. He said it wasnt as risky as
smoking but it was about as risky as being obese. But being male isnt
something a person can control, you say. It is a state of being and not
a behavior. But is obesity also a behavior? Or is it a state of being?
Eating a healthy diet is a behavior. Exercising is a behavior. Being fat
is not a behavior.
|
mary
|
|
response 37 of 378:
|
Mar 4 23:11 UTC 2006 |
I went to:
http://scholar.google.com
and put in "maintaining weight loss", and found a lot of articles that
spoke to the issues of, essentially, the efficacy of weight loss diets.
I'll link to one abstract - "Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a
meta-analysis of US studies", published in 2001. Here is the bottom line:
"In conclusion, this meta-analysis of 29 reports of long-term weight-loss
maintenance indicated that weight-loss maintenance 4 or 5 y after a
structured weight-loss program averages 3.0 kg or 23% of initial weight
loss, representing a sustained reduction in body weight of 3.2%.
Individuals who participated in a VLED program or lost 20 kg had a
weight-loss maintenance at 4 or 5 y of 7 kg or 29% of initial weight loss,
representing a sustained reduction in body weight of 6.6%. Although
success in weight-loss maintenance has improved over the past decade, much
more research is required to enable most individuals to sustain the
lifestyle changes in physical activity and food choices necessary for
successful weight maintenance."
It's pretty much understood that an obese person can make a significant
improvement in health by losing just 10% of their body weight. Someone
need not reach and maintain a goal weight to make their loss worthwhile.
Keeping off 23% of a weight loss, for five years, sounds positive
to me. Heck, not gaining sounds positive, which is what probably
would have happened had they given up and not tried to lose weight to
begin with.
Anyhow, the link:
http://intl.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/74/5/579
|
slynne
|
|
response 38 of 378:
|
Mar 5 00:33 UTC 2006 |
Interesting study. Thanks for the link.
Some comments about the study mentioned in resp:147
*It studied only two very specific types of diets. I dont know anything
about them. They do seem to be two types that involve more medical
intervention than the average self imposed diet.
*a lot of the people in the original groups (some groups had as few as
50% of the original subjects available) that lost weight were not
available for the 4 or 5 year followup. I think the possibility for self
selection should be considered i.e. people who gained all of their
weight back would be more likely not to want to participate in the
followup.
*There is no mention of the percentage of original subjects who had any
weight loss at all. Which means that when they say something like that
there was an average weight loss of 3.0kg (Which is around 6.5 lbs)
there is no way to know if 3.0kg is a typical amout of weight loss for
most people in the study or if a few people lost large amounts of weight
.
Mary says, "It's pretty much understood that an obese person can make a
significant improvement in health by losing just 10% of their body
weight."
I am not sure that is true but I dont exactly doubt it either. But ok,
lets assume that you have a 300lb person who is 6ft tall and who loses
30lbs by eating a healthy diet and exercising regularly. Would you say
that person is healthy? Would you say that person is doing all they can
for their health assuming they dont engage in other high risk behaviors?
I would. But that person would still be over a hundred pounds
overweight!
Mary says, "Heck, not gaining sounds positive, which is what probably
would have happened had they given up and not tried to lose weight to
begin with."
I dont believe that is true necessarily. FWIW, most of the people I know
who have stable weights dont diet. I havent gone on an "official" diet
in around five years and I havent gained any significant weight during
that time. (not counting when I gained back the weight I lost when I
went on Zoloft a couple of years ago).
FWIW, I am not advocating that people start stuffing their faces with
pizza or french fries or snickers bars or anything like that (although I
think if someone does want to do that, they should be able to without
being subject to ridicule and shame but that is another subject). I am
saying that for a lot of people, dieting is harmful for their health.
Not all weight loss diets are healthy. Most weight loss diets fail.
Diets can lead to eating disorders.
I am not even against weight loss, btw. I think that whenever an
overweight person with a bad diet and poor exercise habits changes those
behaviors, they will probably lose some weight. That is natural. But
they will not necessarily lose enough weight to put them into a normal
weight catagory. Some people will still be fat even if they eat a
healthy diet and exercise.
|
furs
|
|
response 39 of 378:
|
Mar 5 00:34 UTC 2006 |
I think people do gain weight back after diets a lot, don't know the
percentage. But lets say you lost 100, but kept 75 of it off for over
10 years. In theroy you have "failed the diet" because you gained
back, but have your really failed? I think not.
|
scholar
|
|
response 40 of 378:
|
Mar 5 01:07 UTC 2006 |
at first, i was going to read mary's post, but then i realized it wasn't about
me. :(
|
naftee
|
|
response 41 of 378:
|
Mar 5 05:10 UTC 2006 |
i always read scholar's posts !
|
mary
|
|
response 42 of 378:
|
Mar 5 12:41 UTC 2006 |
Re: 38 The research looked at two different types of diets, not really
specific diets. VLEDs are very low energy diets (low calorie) diets and
HBEs are diets where the Harris-Benedict equation is used to calculate a
person's specific caloric needs and then setting a caloric goal just under
maintainance requirements.
"But ok, lets assume that you have a 300lb person who is 6ft
tall and who loses 30lbs by eating a healthy diet and exercising
regularly. Would you say that person is healthy?"
I would say that person is healthier.
"I am saying that for a lot of people, dieting is harmful for their
health. Not all weight loss diets are healthy. Most weight loss diets
fail. Diets can lead to eating disorders."
Agreed, not all diets are safe. But for the most part people don't tend
to tolerate reckless diets for long so they don't damage their bodies as
much as they give themselves the message they are failures and it makes
it harder to try again. And if someone weighs ~300 pounds they already
have an eating disorder.
|
keesan
|
|
response 43 of 378:
|
Mar 5 13:04 UTC 2006 |
Slynne, what sorts of foods do you eat? Do you consider that you are eating
a healthy diet? I know someone who lost 5 lb/month by not drinking soda.
|
slynne
|
|
response 44 of 378:
|
Mar 5 15:34 UTC 2006 |
resp:39 - I would consider such a diet a success too!
resp:42 I think I will have to disagree with you. I think it is possible
for a person to be overweight and healthy. In fact, in my own family, my
severely obese grandmother has been healthy her whole life (until
recently) and is currently in her nineties. I think that when you get
into the over 100lbs catagory, there are some weight related health
risks but because diets fail so frequently, it causes more harm than
good to tell people to lose weight. It is better to recommend a healthy
diet and to encourage exercise.
Here is an exerpt form Laura Fraser's book _Losing It_ where she talks
about a study done at Cornell.
"The health risks of being underweight haven't been calculated into any
of these equations... In a 1996 study, David Levitsky and his colleagues
at Cornell University analyzed 60 previous studies involving weight and
early deaths, involving 357,000 men and 249,000 women (many times more
than the Nurses' Health Study), and found that the health risks of
moderate obesity were exaggerated, whereas the risks of being
underweight have been neglected. For women, there was little
relationship between weight and early death at all. For men, after
controlling for confounding factors such as smoking and disease, the
data showed . . . those men who were very underweight were as likely to
die early as people who were seriously obese. For everyone between the
extremes, weight wasn't a substantial factor in their death. "The health
risks of being moderately underweight are comparable to that of being
quite overweight and look more serious than most people realize,"
Levitsky said."
Here is an exerpt from an article in The New England Journal of Medicine
written by Jerome P Kassirer, MD and Marcia Angell, MD.
"Given the enormous social pressure to lose weight, one might suppose
there is clear and overwhelming evidence of the risks of obesity and the
benefits of weight loss. Unfortunately, the data linking overweight and
death, as well as the data showing the beneficial effects of weight
loss, are limited, fragmentary, and often ambiguous."
I also do not necessarily think that every person who is overweight or
even severely overweight has an eating disorder at least not in the way
I think of eating disorders. I think anyone who eats when they are
hungry, eats reasonably healthy foods, and who stops eating when they
are no longer hungry probably doesnt have an eating disorder. Of course
if one defines an eating disorder as having any eating habits that lead
to be one being fat than any fat person would have an eating disorder by
definition.
However, I will grant you that it is probably pretty hard to find
someone who weighs over 300lbs who doesnt have some sort of messed up
ideas about eating. Partially because I doubt you can find anyone who is
that overweight who hasnt tried just about every diet in the universe.
And partially because of the way our culture treats obesity as a moral
issue. If a person is given the message that being fat is a moral
failing (and trust me, every fat person gets this message in one way or
another), and that no one who eats a healthy diet and who exercises can
possibly be fat, then every bite of food gets questioned and a person
might find they have food issues.
resp:43 - I think there is a lot of room for improvement in my own diet.
But, my diet isnt totally bad. I eat a lot of fruit and veggies. I never
have been a big fan of pop and have recently pretty much cut it out of
my diet totally because I have decided not to eat high fructose corn
syrup. I did buy a pop imported from Mexico and made with sugar last
week though so it isnt that I dont drink it. On a typical day I will
have oatmeal for breakfast although twice a week, I have pancakes and
sausage. For lunch, I'll have something like baked chicken and a side of
veggies from the work cafeteria. Dinner is often pasta with garlic and
olive oil and maybe some parmesan cheese and a salad or something.
Sometimes I have toast and goat cheese and sliced fruit. I used to eat a
lot of processed food for dinner (i.e. frozen dinners) but I have been
getting away from that. I usually take an apple to work in case I get
hungry. I snack on fruit a lot and veggies less often. Sometimes I will
eat sweets in the evening. Not every day but often enough that I am
probably eating too much sugar. Until I hurt my knee in January, I took
the dogs on a half hour - 45 minute walk 3 or 4 days a week which is
more exercise than a lot of thin people get but not exactly a huge
amount of exercise either.
FWIW, I probably have an eating disorder although on the spectrum of
eating disorders, I would say that I have a mild case. I binge once or
twice a year, usually as a response to stress. I have found that I eat
on a schedule more than as a response to actual hunger. I respond to
external cues about when to stop eating (i.e. I clean my plate) . I did
get a book recently about eating disorders and I am following their plan
for overcoming it. I am not totally sure about all of their advice yet
but I have decided to give it six months. Even if I do happen to
normalize my relationship with food, I dont expect that I will lose much
weight.
|
mary
|
|
response 45 of 378:
|
Mar 5 17:33 UTC 2006 |
I respect your willingness to share your point of view. What we eat and
how we deal with the related health issues tends to be an area few people
are comfortable talking about, publicly. Kind of a shame because we can
learn from each other. Thanks for entering this item.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 46 of 378:
|
Mar 5 19:20 UTC 2006 |
http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8157
Just amazing!
|