|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 21 new of 42 responses total. |
tonster
|
|
response 22 of 42:
| 
Mar 27 22:44 UTC 2003 |
resp:18,resp:19,resp:20,resp:21 : I've talked to Rex, and he's
aware of the issue. WWNet does not wish to call Level3 or XO (their 2
providers, who are currently null routing us) until EOB today, because if the
attack is still ongoing, they do not wish to have their customers impacted. We
understand this. Dave will contact both Level3 and XO this evening and have
those null routes removed and plug m-net back into the wwnet network. Here is
the information I received from james this afternoon regarding the exact
circumstances of the incident:
03/27/2003 @ 13:14:40 james: well last night there was a huge DoS attack
on them... so they are unplugged here, as well as being null routed at
level3 and xo
03/27/2003 @ 13:14:54 james: dave said it was enough to take down all of
xo michigan
03/27/2003 @ 13:18:35 james: it looked like it was a botnet that was
spoofing packets.... some of the IPs were real, but most of them were
not valid IPs
03/27/2003 @ 13:21:30 james: i dont know if the attack is still going
on, but we need to contact level3 to have them remove the filters when
its stopped
03/27/2003 @ 13:23:37 james: oh yeah, we only have 20Mbits from them and
it was full... but the amount of bandwidth wasnt the major problem it
was the packets per second that hurt
03/27/2003 @ 16:02:54 james: dave said he wasn't going to try to get it
removed from level3 until after business hours... if it was still going
on and it gets removed it would fuck everything up
|
aryeh
|
|
response 23 of 42:
|
Mar 27 23:04 UTC 2003 |
sounds like a bunch of your liberal friends decided that shutting
down m-net as a civil disobedance act to protest the war.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 24 of 42:
|
Mar 27 23:09 UTC 2003 |
More like aryeh threw a fit.
|
aryeh
|
|
response 25 of 42:
|
Mar 27 23:17 UTC 2003 |
your a fine one to be talking ;-)
|
aryeh
|
|
response 26 of 42:
|
Mar 28 08:02 UTC 2003 |
so whats the story now?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 27 of 42:
|
Mar 28 11:15 UTC 2003 |
We've notifed Homeland Security.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 28 of 42:
|
Mar 28 14:26 UTC 2003 |
Homerland Insecurity
|
naftee
|
|
response 29 of 42:
|
Mar 28 14:37 UTC 2003 |
DID ARYEH DO IT OR POLYTARP? WHICH ONE TONSTER?
|
jp2
|
|
response 30 of 42:
|
Mar 28 14:50 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 31 of 42:
|
Mar 28 15:35 UTC 2003 |
Because polytarp pissed off the intarweb.
|
edina
|
|
response 32 of 42:
|
Mar 28 16:21 UTC 2003 |
Tony, thanks for doing so much on this.
|
iggy
|
|
response 33 of 42:
|
Mar 28 17:13 UTC 2003 |
yeah, thanks.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 34 of 42:
|
Mar 28 19:09 UTC 2003 |
I didn't do anything.
THANK U DONEY!
|
jep
|
|
response 35 of 42:
|
Mar 28 19:54 UTC 2003 |
M-Net is back up now.
|
naftee
|
|
response 36 of 42:
|
Mar 28 20:59 UTC 2003 |
DANKS DONY AND JEP
|
iggy
|
|
response 37 of 42:
|
Mar 28 21:28 UTC 2003 |
really? coool
|
jep
|
|
response 38 of 42:
|
Mar 29 02:53 UTC 2003 |
You're welcome. I'm glad you appreciate my efforts in the matter for
I certainly strove mightily to combat the awful forces which separated
us all from M-Net.
|
krokus
|
|
response 39 of 42:
|
Apr 30 14:33 UTC 2003 |
M-box is unreachable. Trace ends at a Cisco within wwnet. Is it
another DoS attack?
|
iggy
|
|
response 40 of 42:
|
Apr 30 15:33 UTC 2003 |
all i know, was that it was ugly and it *pooped*
and i cant get on mnet.
|
jor
|
|
response 41 of 42:
|
Apr 30 16:59 UTC 2003 |
and down.arbornet.org is also
|
iggy
|
|
response 42 of 42:
|
Apr 30 19:11 UTC 2003 |
i can get on THAT..
|