| Grex > Coop13 > #111: A Proposal to Clarify Grex's Stance on Deleting Items |
| response 214 of 235: | 
Mar 15 17:41 UTC 2004 |
Yet no-one has any fucking idea what it does.
| response 215 of 235: |
Mar 15 17:52 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
| response 216 of 235: |
Mar 15 18:08 UTC 2004 |
Exact wording is in response #154.
| response 217 of 235: |
Mar 15 18:20 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
| response 218 of 235: |
Mar 15 18:32 UTC 2004 |
No, I don't think it can be twisted to include parody items. It's not intended to be so twisted, any way.
| response 219 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
| response 220 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:20 UTC 2004 |
uh ?
| response 221 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:27 UTC 2004 |
Past experience has been that such duplicate items are caught before people reply substantively to them. The responses I've seen have been "This is a duplicate" and "Kill it, please," responses that shouldn't cause a problem when removed with the offending item. Others would have to be judged on a case-by-case basis by those involved.
| response 222 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:29 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
| response 223 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:39 UTC 2004 |
YEs, because they're about a DEAD MUSICIAN. Get it? HAhahaahaha
| response 224 of 235: |
Mar 15 19:58 UTC 2004 |
Not after people have responded to them.
| response 225 of 235: |
Mar 15 20:30 UTC 2004 |
It was a joke.
| response 226 of 235: |
Mar 15 23:58 UTC 2004 |
Why don't you just post once and ask someone to link?
| response 227 of 235: |
Mar 16 00:05 UTC 2004 |
(Because that wouldn't test the wording of the just-approved policy.)
| response 228 of 235: |
Mar 16 00:12 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
| response 229 of 235: |
Mar 16 00:19 UTC 2004 |
This item violates Grex's general principles. It must be deleted now.
| response 230 of 235: |
Mar 16 00:20 UTC 2004 |
#229: /s/item/response
| response 231 of 235: |
Mar 16 00:25 UTC 2004 |
Keep in mind, other, that even if only response contains the actual violating material, the policy Grex just adopted means the whole item has to go.
| response 232 of 235: |
Mar 16 01:27 UTC 2004 |
Then why hasn't item 7 in the agora40 conference been deleted yet, even though I've asked for it to be gone PRECISELY because it contains information that JEP wished to be gone ?
| response 233 of 235: |
Mar 29 02:01 UTC 2004 |
UYEAH' ANSWER THIS JERKS"
| response 234 of 235: |
Mar 29 02:22 UTC 2004 |
allo
| response 235 of 235: |
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE