You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-306       
 
Author Message
25 new of 306 responses total.
rcurl
response 213 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 01:11 UTC 2004

I even think it could not have gotten into the theaters at all except for
the "Jesus" cover. Once that button is pushed a whole bunch of people go
into mental lock-step like zombies. 

rcurl
response 214 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 01:34 UTC 2004

_Matchstick Men_ (DVD, 2003): a little flim-flam caper goes awry - or does
it? In any case, WE were the one's flim-flammed. I was tempted to watch
it again to see if I could catch the trick.

_The Endurance_ (DVD, 2000): The story of Sir Ernest Shackleton's
ill-fated 1914 expedition to Antarctic, which foundered in the Weddel Sea
ice pack, leading to a 635-day self-rescue marathon. The film is mostly a
narration of the photographs taken by the ship's photographer, with
supplemental current on-site views and partial reenactments. Shackleton's
27 crew members all survived. It is nearly unbelievable story of personal
courage and leadership.

mcnally
response 215 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 02:38 UTC 2004

  I wonder if that's the same Shackleton-expedition film I saw in IMAX
  format in Seattle a few years ago..
bru
response 216 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 03:06 UTC 2004

tell us all "why" it is anti-semetic.
rational
response 217 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 03:08 UTC 2004

Did you not notice how all the Jews had huge noses and wallets?
rcurl
response 218 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 06:50 UTC 2004

Besides that....it is anti-semitic because of the centuries of blame by
Christians of the Jews for the alleged crucifixion. You can't turn around
that centuries old tradition overnight - and I bet the thought is still
harbored by a lot of Christians, especially fundmentalists. Anti-semitic
acts are still frequent (burning of synagogues, graffitti on tombstones
and buildings, etc.). 

md
response 219 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 12:33 UTC 2004

I've seen the swastika graffiti.  There was an incident in my home town 
once: a brand-new modernistic synogogue - an architectural masterpiece, 
set in a beautiful wooded area - was covered with swastikas in the 
night.  Turned out to be a bunch of rich drunken frat boys, but I don't 
doubt the Christians of Rane's colorful imagination - whipped up to a 
vandalous frenzy by watching Mel Gibson's movie - are capable of it, 
too.

"Frequent burning of synagogues" is another matter.  I don't recall 
hearing about synagogues burning down even once in a while, much 
less "frequently."  Anyway, I'm afraid the most likely perps in any 
future such arson and vandalism, especially where I live, won't be 
fundie Christians.
remmers
response 220 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 12:37 UTC 2004

Re #212, #216:  Safire's column on "The Passion" can be found at
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/01/opinion/01SAFI.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEdi
tor
ials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fWilliam%20Safire

(Sorry about the long URL.)
rational
response 221 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 12:55 UTC 2004

http://url.rexroof.com/, newb
remmers
response 222 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 13:19 UTC 2004

http://url.rexroof.com/515
rational
response 223 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 13:56 UTC 2004

Thanks!
bru
response 224 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 15:09 UTC 2004

In 1965's historic Second Vatican Council, during the papacy of Paul VI, the
church decided that while some Jewish leaders and their followers had pressed
for the death of Jesus, "still, what happened in his passion cannot be charged
against all Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the Jews of
today." 

That was a sea change in the doctrinal interpretation of the Gospels, and the
beginning of major interfaith progress

William Safire


I don't kniow what planet Safire lives on, but my church never taught that
jews were responsible for the death of Christ.  Of course I am not Catholic,
and we were taught the pope was full of hooey.
rcurl
response 225 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 16:25 UTC 2004

Safire expressed more eloquently than I have my sense that this movie is a
piece of the same anti-semitic "tradition" of the classic passion plays. 
It is also an example of "religious excess" - carrying aspects of
religious mythology way too far as a means of emphasis. But here these
seeming "traditionalists" go too far. They are the ones that complain that
violence depicted in movies creates a society more tolerant of violence. 
How can they applaud this extreme excess of violence? 

albaugh
response 226 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 18:37 UTC 2004

> Once that button ["Jesus"] is pushed a whole bunch of people go
> into mental lock-step like zombies.

Really, rcurl, such caustic generalizations don't become you.
rcurl
response 227 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 20:04 UTC 2004

Well, I did feel that I had perhaps gone too far with that one. But
there is a variety of religious fanaticism that obscures peoples'
senses of proportion (is that a kinder way of saying the same thing?). 
I think Passion dips into that kind of fanaticism.
twenex
response 228 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 23:58 UTC 2004

"the pope [is] full of hooey". Well, someone once said that 95% of everthing
is crap, which I suppose means that (a) most of us are capable of a lot hooey;
(b) moany of us are full of hooey; (c) a small proportion of us are
responsible for a disporportionate amount of hooey. I wonder which bru agrees
with?
tod
response 229 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 00:02 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

twenex
response 230 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 00:12 UTC 2004

If it could, the GOP would be the party *least* interested in lessening
America's dependence on foreign oil and ruining Alaska.
jmsaul
response 231 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 02:29 UTC 2004

Re #224:  Safire is talking about Catholic doctrine before Vatican II.  He
          lives on the same planet you do, but he's better read, apparently.
richard
response 232 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 02:35 UTC 2004

this is the MOVIE REVIEW item...can we move the religious discussion drift
to a new item?  what movies have you seen lately?
jmsaul
response 233 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 02:38 UTC 2004

Unfortunately, none.  The current crop of movies doesn't look interesting to
me.
bru
response 234 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 03:08 UTC 2004

I kniow what he was talking about Joe.  But I spent 8 years in a Christian
SChool during that period.  While not catholic, I did grow up in a catholic
neighborhood.  I always found the catholics reatehr demented in their
attitude, what with being able to commit sins and then go to confession and
be absolved.

But I never heard any schools or churches in our area that blamed Jews for
the death of Jesus during that period, either before or after.
aruba
response 235 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 03:55 UTC 2004

We saw "The Triplets of Belleville" at the Michigan Theater tonight.  It was
weird.
albaugh
response 236 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 18:06 UTC 2004

I didn't know that Belleville had anything interesting enough going on to make
a movie about.  Well, maybe the Strawberry Festival...  ;-)
remmers
response 237 of 306: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 18:09 UTC 2004

Right, the Belleville I know is *so* dull that only Michelangelo Antonioni
would consider making a movie about it.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-306       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss