You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-21   21-45   46-70   71-95   96-120   121-145   146-170   171-176   
 
Author Message
25 new of 176 responses total.
mynxcat
response 21 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 14:39 UTC 2002

No I'm not a member yet. But I will be. By when do I need to be a member?
remmers
response 22 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 18:55 UTC 2002

You would need to be a member by December 1, the start of the voting
period.
mynxcat
response 23 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 19:08 UTC 2002

Thank you.
janc
response 24 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 21:09 UTC 2002

Re #15:  On grex seconds are not needed, nor are nominations.  All you
gotta do is say you are running.  Self nomination is OK.
janc
response 25 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 21:12 UTC 2002

I'll discuss the question of whether or not I shall run with my campaign
committee.
i
response 26 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 02:31 UTC 2002

<i imagines a gavel-wielding Arlo & a bunch of stuffed animals seated
around a large conference table...several large whiteboards show poll
& focus group results...>
mynxcat
response 27 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 15:26 UTC 2002

Wow! Thats an adorable visualisation!
tsty
response 28 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 17:30 UTC 2002

but are the whiteboard markings legible .... yet  ?
mooncat
response 29 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 29 05:30 UTC 2002

I'm not sure if I will be accepting or not, but thank you for the 
nomination Eric. Will decide shortly.
mary
response 30 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 29 11:46 UTC 2002

You've been a real asset, Anne.  I hope you decide to
go for another term.
aruba
response 31 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 29 23:00 UTC 2002

Likewise.
janc
response 32 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 03:42 UTC 2002

Arlo is of the opinion that instead of running for Grex board, I should play
"wooden railroads" with him.  As usual, he got to be Thomas and I got to be
Percy.  Kendra says "eeoouuu!"  Kendra is doing vowels.  Valerie was neutral,
but not interested in running herself.  I retreated to my chambers to give
the matter some thought, and promptly fell asleep.  We concluded that the
candidate's triumphant return to the public arena should be postponed until
the candidate can stop to think without falling asleep.

I respectfully decline my nomination.
bhelliom
response 33 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 14:04 UTC 2002

I'm sorry it's taken me this long to reply.  Many crazy things have 
been going on for the last several weeks which have demanded and 
drained all excess time and energy, and said craziness was well on the 
way to obtaining majority shares in the company that is the Bhelliom.  
Thankfully, the corporate takeover and subsequent merger were declared 
illegal by the FTC.  That being said, I would like to accept my 
nomination for MB.  Thanks for the nomination from Richard and the vote 
of confidence from Marcus.
mooncat
response 34 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 17:28 UTC 2002

Well, thank you for the words of encouragement. :)

Upon further thought, I have decided that I will accept my nomination.
jep
response 35 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 21:27 UTC 2002

The list of candidates appears to be not just good, but dazzling.  Grex 
wins.
other
response 36 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 04:33 UTC 2002

I love a good slate.
remmers
response 37 of 176: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 11:50 UTC 2002

Here are the people who have been nominated so far and have not
declined:

  aruba, mooncat, bhelliom, krj, remmers, gelinas, mynxcat,
  kaplan, polytarp

Accepted:  aruba, mooncat, bhelliom, gelinas, mynxcat, polytarp
kaplan
response 38 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 14:40 UTC 2002

Thanks to aruba for nominating me, but I do not think I can make time 
to serve on the board this year.  I have not even been keeping up with 
the coop conference lately!
aruba
response 39 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 21:39 UTC 2002

Oh, I'd like to nominate Walter Cramer (i), as well.
i
response 40 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 13:22 UTC 2002

Thank you, aruba, but i'm afraid that i don't currently have the time
to do a good job.
remmers
response 41 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 12:59 UTC 2002

Nominations are open through November 15.  That's a bit over two
more days.  Here's how things stand:

Accepted nominations:  aruba, mooncat, bhelliom, gelinas, mynxcat, polytarp
Nominated but not yet accepted or declined:  krj, remmers

To appear on the ballot, nominees must affirmatively accept in this item,
and be members in good standing, by the time voting starts on December 1.
remmers
response 42 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 13:06 UTC 2002

I should point out in addition that since Grex is incorporated in Michigan,
eligibility to serve is also governed by state requirements.  I believe
that there was a fairly recent change to Michigan law regarding age
restrictions.  It used to be that all members had to be at least 18 years
old, but I think that's been liberalized somewhat.  Unfortunately the URL
that used to point to this no longer works, and I've been unable to track
this down.  Does anybody else know what the current requirements are?

Regardless, I think this would affect the eligibility of at most one of
the current nominees.
mynxcat
response 43 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 14:45 UTC 2002

What exactly is a Member in Good Standing? Does it mean that I have to become
a paying member, or do I have to be a paying member for a certain amount of
time by Dec 1?
aruba
response 44 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 15:29 UTC 2002

It means you have to be a member whose dues are paid through at least the
end of the election.  (Sometimes people's memberships expire, but I keep
them on the rolls for a little while afterward, hoping that they will send
money to renew.  While I'm waiting, those people are still members, but not
in good standing.  (And they aren't allowed to vote.))
mynxcat
response 45 of 176: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 15:46 UTC 2002

Ok, I'll send in my dues soon.
 0-21   21-45   46-70   71-95   96-120   121-145   146-170   171-176   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss