|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 251 responses total. |
cross
|
|
response 209 of 251:
| 
Mar 4 16:31 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 210 of 251:
|
Mar 4 17:03 UTC 2003 |
Incidentally, it appears this isn't exploitable on some systems. It
depends on how the binary is structured, so it may vary from build to build.
|
gull
|
|
response 211 of 251:
|
Mar 4 17:07 UTC 2003 |
I've always wondered a little if postfix is really more secure, or just
less common (and hence under less scrutiny.) I'm always a little
suspicious of claims of (in)security based on the number of *discovered*
bugs.
|
cross
|
|
response 212 of 251:
|
Mar 4 21:09 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jhudson
|
|
response 213 of 251:
|
Mar 4 22:49 UTC 2003 |
I'm going to get a good laugh when somebody tries to exploit that
bug against us! I don't think very many hackers can write
SunOS shellcode.
|
cross
|
|
response 214 of 251:
|
Mar 4 23:34 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tsty
|
|
response 215 of 251:
|
Mar 6 08:35 UTC 2003 |
script-kiddies suck.
|
dpc
|
|
response 216 of 251:
|
Mar 6 14:49 UTC 2003 |
So is it correct to assume that the widely-reported bug
in sendmail doesn't affect us?
|
cross
|
|
response 217 of 251:
|
Mar 7 07:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
saizen
|
|
response 218 of 251:
|
Mar 7 08:35 UTC 2003 |
i am trying to work with centering but it seems i need the glib library 1.2
or more new... Some body could renove it? it's very important for me.
Saizen
|
dpc
|
|
response 219 of 251:
|
Mar 7 21:45 UTC 2003 |
Dan, I drew my conclusion because no staff has said otherwise,
and because staff has already hacked sendmail. Plus, no outside
crazies have seized root. I hope. 8-)
|
cross
|
|
response 220 of 251:
|
Mar 8 03:46 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 221 of 251:
|
Mar 10 03:32 UTC 2003 |
It hasn't been patched with the 'official' patch yet, at very least. So
it's probably vulnerable.
AFAIK there's no working exploit for this on SunOS (or any other OS)
yet, not that anyone should be reassured much by that.
|
jep
|
|
response 222 of 251:
|
Mar 10 17:34 UTC 2003 |
Backtalk isn't responding but telnet is working fine.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 223 of 251:
|
Mar 10 19:50 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 224 of 251:
|
Mar 10 21:02 UTC 2003 |
Web server was probably down for some reason.
|
gull
|
|
response 225 of 251:
|
Mar 11 01:30 UTC 2003 |
Incidentally, if you haven't already, you might want to email staff about
the sendmail thing. They tend to read email a lot more often than they read
this item.
|
goose
|
|
response 226 of 251:
|
Mar 12 00:04 UTC 2003 |
I tried the Backtalk interface today, and could not get the Abelone(sp?)
one to work, it just sat there.
|
jhudson
|
|
response 227 of 251:
|
Mar 13 16:44 UTC 2003 |
They all just sit there for a while. Be patient. This screen took
2min to come up.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 228 of 251:
|
Mar 13 18:59 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
russ
|
|
response 229 of 251:
|
Mar 14 02:44 UTC 2003 |
Re #228: That may not be Grex, it might be your browser (or web
proxy server) timing out more quickly than Grex responds.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 230 of 251:
|
Mar 14 15:00 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
russ
|
|
response 231 of 251:
|
Mar 14 23:20 UTC 2003 |
Almost no mail has been delivered today. Something's wrong.
|
gull
|
|
response 232 of 251:
|
Mar 15 01:20 UTC 2003 |
I've gotten a fair amount of mail. About as much as I normally expect,
anyway.
|
davel
|
|
response 233 of 251:
|
Mar 15 01:35 UTC 2003 |
Same here.
|
