|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 536 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 206 of 536:
| 
Oct 15 02:15 UTC 2003 |
(You could put it in a file in your www directory and post a link to
it here.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 207 of 536:
|
Oct 15 02:20 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 208 of 536:
|
Oct 17 17:21 UTC 2003 |
RE#190
WHAT!!!! You stupid mother. Do you live in bubble or is it that you have taken
a pychotic break from reality.This truly is a liberal dungeon of mostly
idiots.
gull...where did you hear that from? Are the "voices" speaking to you? Have
you taken your daily dose of melaril lately? As I said before NO_ONE but
faggots,femanazis and STUPID grexers will vote for Dean. That moron is so far
to the left if he goes any further he will do a 180. You idiots have the nerve
to diss Bush? You commie pukes. I wish you would take a page of Johnny Depps
book and move to France. I guess living in Ann Arbor gives you a false sense
of reality. You actually think Dean is ahead of Bush in the polls.
MUHAWHAW. Who did they poll. The ACLU? The NAACP? The Gay rights activists?
Because they sure as hell didn't poll a true cross section sample of America.
Get ready for another four years of TOTAL republican domination.
|
gull
|
|
response 209 of 536:
|
Oct 17 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Hmm. OK, the most recent poll I can find does show Dean trailing Bush
by 14%. Clark is only a few percentage points behind, however, almost
within the poll's margin of error.
|
jp2
|
|
response 210 of 536:
|
Oct 17 19:46 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 211 of 536:
|
Oct 17 20:09 UTC 2003 |
Especially when one person is very prominant and other hardly at all.
|
other
|
|
response 212 of 536:
|
Oct 17 20:54 UTC 2003 |
To put it more broadly, political campaigns are wrong, since nothing a
candidate says during a campaign is really reflective of what they'll do
if elected. You have to look at past records for that.
|
tod
|
|
response 213 of 536:
|
Oct 17 20:59 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 214 of 536:
|
Oct 17 21:22 UTC 2003 |
Ok, lemme rephrase: "...nothing a
candidate says during a campaign is *reliably* reflective of what they'll
do..."
It doesn't mean they won't do what they say, but you have no way of
knowing, and the best way to judge is by reviewing their prior record.
|
tod
|
|
response 215 of 536:
|
Oct 17 21:37 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sno
|
|
response 216 of 536:
|
Oct 18 14:20 UTC 2003 |
I'd vote for G.Bush before Howard Dean. And I'm looking for a reason
not to vote for Bush.
|
tod
|
|
response 217 of 536:
|
Oct 18 14:22 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 218 of 536:
|
Oct 19 19:00 UTC 2003 |
he's probably a strict missionary feller...
(not that his wife is likely aware of him)
i wonder what sort of hypnotic meds he and cheney are
feeding laura "stepford wife" bush to keep her looking
like such a *good little lady* in public.
gawd, i miss hillary
|
slynne
|
|
response 219 of 536:
|
Oct 19 19:33 UTC 2003 |
Me too!
|
tod
|
|
response 220 of 536:
|
Oct 19 21:55 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 221 of 536:
|
Oct 20 00:38 UTC 2003 |
Heck, I wanna know what happened to those hot, hard-drinking Bush daughters.
|
tod
|
|
response 222 of 536:
|
Oct 20 15:22 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 223 of 536:
|
Oct 20 15:36 UTC 2003 |
Thanks!
|
gull
|
|
response 224 of 536:
|
Oct 21 13:48 UTC 2003 |
Wesley Clark is apparently going to skip the Iowa Caucus and concentrate
on primaries he's more likely to win. McCain tried this same tactic in
2000.
|
tod
|
|
response 225 of 536:
|
Oct 21 15:34 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 226 of 536:
|
Oct 21 16:10 UTC 2003 |
"Weasley" is not "likely" to win any primaries, as far as we can tell.
|
tod
|
|
response 227 of 536:
|
Oct 21 16:48 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 228 of 536:
|
Oct 22 01:45 UTC 2003 |
(We have no pets.)
|
tod
|
|
response 229 of 536:
|
Oct 22 15:41 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tinman
|
|
response 230 of 536:
|
Oct 22 17:12 UTC 2003 |
HEY SABRE I WENT TO ARBORNET AND HACKED RYAN`S ACOUNT I DIDN`T THINK I COULD
DO IT BUT AFTER FINGER IT GAVE ME SOME clues and woolah it was hacked
his account has patron privleges so its cool to telnet to differant sites..
talk to you later.......
|
