You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-20   20-44   45-69   70-94   95-119   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-219 
 220-244   245-269   270-294   295-319   320-344   345-369   370-394   395-419   420-444 
 445-469   470-480         
 
Author Message
25 new of 480 responses total.
ball
response 20 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 05:48 UTC 2006

My DSL service probably comes with email and Internet news
if their registration system were not Windows-only.  :-/
Never mind, at least it gets me on the net.
cyklone
response 21 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 06:19 UTC 2006

Re #17: Your freeshell account is kind of irrelevant to the overall
decision-making process of grex. 
gull
response 22 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 04:08 UTC 2006

I would hate to see Grex eliminate email.  I don't read email here
anymore, but my cyberspace.org address is convenient because I can
forward it to whatever ISP I'm currently using.
denise
response 23 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 04:27 UTC 2006

Has anyone else been getting tons of spam from 'debora-something/variant'?
I've probably gotten 150-200 of them just this week! Every time I log in, I
have probably 10-20 or more of them. 
keesan
response 24 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 04:46 UTC 2006

Yes, lots of Deborahs.  Why don't you set up a filter to get rid of them,
using procmail.  Just dump anything From  Deborah.  Spamassassin gets most
of my Debora mail.  I set up a sample procmailrc.sample and procmailrc.simple
(not as many additional filters).  Copy to your home directory as .procmailrc
and also copy .forward and you will see 90% less spam.  I can explain how to
eliminate anything from Deborah if you can't figure it out. 
I forget what Deborah is selling - viagra or stocks?
keesan
response 25 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 04:51 UTC 2006

My procmail log shows 27 Deborahs since midnight, some Hi Keesan and then they
switched to just a random name.  This would come to about 200 per week so your
estimate might even be low.  Even a crazy spammer would not be sending out
this many spams so maybe it has infected other machines?
denise
response 26 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 23:58 UTC 2006

I haven't set up any spam filters; I'm not that computer literate! Besides
a few very basic things here-everything else is mysterious to me.
tsty
response 27 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 02:16 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 28 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 05:42 UTC 2006

But I just explained how to copy over a working filter to keep all the
Deborahs out of your mailbox.  cp /a/k/e/keesan/procmailrc.simple .procmailrc
then pico .procmailrc and change keesan to denise, then cp
/a/k/e/keesan/.forward .forward.  This copies my two files and changes one
of them to work for you.  Do you know how to use pico to edit?  I presume you
use it in your mail (with pine).  This should take you a minute or two.  Then
when using pine you type L to get a choice of seeing what is in your Inbox
or what is in your Spam folder.  And you get a list of what went where:
less ~/mail/from   shows you the list and you can delete 'from' every day.
The sample filter only dumps anything with 5 spam points and the rest goes
into the spam folder.  I use 3 points, which works better, and you can change
it to that.  
denise
response 29 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 11:23 UTC 2006

Sindi, I don't know how to use pico or any other editing program and though
I've heard the term 'pine', I have no idea what that is [besides a type of
tree].  Maybe that's partly why I rarely use mail here on grex; I am more
comfortable with the mail I use on my non-grex account. But I get much more
spam here, probably because of the spam filters they use...
mary
response 30 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 13:51 UTC 2006

I think it's amazingly wonderful that despite the fact Denise doesn't 
edit, her responses are clear, typo and spelling error-free.  I 
use an editor and wish I could pull that off.
nharmon
response 31 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 13:58 UTC 2006

People who grew up with pen and paper tend to write slowly and
purposefully. Kids like me grew up with word processors, and often we
type faster than we think. *smile*
mary
response 32 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 14:01 UTC 2006

And TS, please realize that when you repost something like #27
you are simply acting as selfish as the original poster.  Worse,
actually, as you should know better.  

Don't make me filter you again.

nharmon
response 33 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 14:05 UTC 2006

Threatening to filter people is childish, IMO.
slynne
response 34 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 14:28 UTC 2006

Is it? I mean, if someone threatened *me* with filtering, most likely 
it wouldnt alter my behavior. But I might appreciate being told that I 
was being filtered. 
nharmon
response 35 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 14:32 UTC 2006

Yeah, threatening to filter is childish in a bossy "i wont be your
friend unless you do X" sort of way. If you're going to filter, be done
with it. But don't play these games where you threaten to filter someone
because you don't like what they say.
keesan
response 36 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 14:38 UTC 2006

Denise, I can edit the procmailrc file for you if you can manage to copy it
to your own directory.  Let me know.  cp ~keesan/procmail.denise .procmailrc
and then cp ~keesan/.forward .   but you have to be at a prompt to do this,
not a menu.  
I wish someone in staff would set up a filter that people can use who don't
know how to edit, by just typing change and following instructions.  I am
still getting floods of debora and also est* and akst* .
mary
response 37 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 16:47 UTC 2006

Oh, I'll still be his friend.  I just won't be reading re-floods.
slynne
response 38 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 16:55 UTC 2006

resp:35 I think that some people do use the threat of filtering in a 
bossy way but I also think it is something of a courtesy to let people 
know you are considering filtering them. In fact, I generally dont tell 
people when I stop paying attention to them because I dont care enough 
about them to give them that courtesy. I suppose some people might 
actually believe that they are so important that it will come as a real 
blow to others to hear that they are being filtered. But mostly, I 
think people tell others when they do it to give others the opportunity 
to change their behavior if they wish to. 

I dont tell people because I am mean and I dont care if the socially 
retarded figure stuff out. Anyways, I guess what I find is funny is 
that you are calling a certain behavior childish which suggests that 
you think its opposite (i.e. NOT telling someone when they are going to 
be filtered) is a particularly mature behavior. It is funny because I 
engage in just that behavior but motivated not by any "taking the high 
road" sense. My motivation is pure and utter indifference to the 
feelings of certain others. It is unkind and has nothing to do with 
maturity at all. 
denise
response 39 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 23:20 UTC 2006

Re: 30 Thanks, Mary! :-)

Re:36 Sindi, I do use the menu options, so I don't know how to get the other
prompts that I would probably need to copy and such.  Thanks for offering to
help, though.
keesan
response 40 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 00:12 UTC 2006

Could someone who uses the menu explain how to get to a prompt that lets
someone copy files?  It would really help people like denise if there were
a simple command in the menu that would set up a spam filter.
kingjon
response 41 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 01:55 UTC 2006

The "R)un a UNIX Program" option could be used for this, I suppose. (For a
sequence of commands, give a shell like bash as the program to run.)

tsty
response 42 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 08:34 UTC 2006

re #32 ................................again ?????????????????????????
ball
response 43 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 09:14 UTC 2006

Does "!/bin/sh" work from the menu prompt?
remmers
response 44 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 12:21 UTC 2006

Yes.
 0-20   20-44   45-69   70-94   95-119   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-219 
 220-244   245-269   270-294   295-319   320-344   345-369   370-394   395-419   420-444 
 445-469   470-480         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss