|
Grex > Music2 > #279: Napster: Thieves or Coolness? |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 11 new of 206 responses total. |
polygon
|
|
response 196 of 206:
| 
Sep 27 20:23 UTC 2000 |
Copies at the U-M library are 7 cents with a copy card. Finding a
specific book that was published 50 years ago is difficult and expensive.
And I can mark up the copy.
|
polygon
|
|
response 197 of 206:
|
Sep 27 20:25 UTC 2000 |
Er, I should say, finding a specific old book is time-consuming, expensive,
and often futile, even with Ebay and Bibliofind.
|
brighn
|
|
response 198 of 206:
|
Sep 27 21:10 UTC 2000 |
Precisely. Which is why it makes sense to copy entire out-of-print books and
in-print academic books, and less sense to copy entire in-press mainstream
books, economically speaking.
|
raven
|
|
response 199 of 206:
|
Oct 14 22:44 UTC 2000 |
Now linked to cyber punk along with the other 2 mp3 items.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 200 of 206:
|
May 4 04:43 UTC 2001 |
Prince appeared on The Tonight Show this evening. Leno said something about
Napster, to which Prince replied, "The artists don't get paid anyway." So
Leno asked for clarification, mentioning Mariah Carey's $20M contract. Prince
pointed out that an album sells for $18 and asked how much of that would Leno
give the artist. Leno said, "Half", so Prince said that 1 million copies
would mean $10M to Mariah, 2 million would be $20M, and 3 million would be
$30M: "I think Mariah got screwed."
How long does it take to sell a million copies?
|
carson
|
|
response 201 of 206:
|
May 4 22:49 UTC 2001 |
(it depends on the artist. for example, Janet Jackson's most recent
album entered at #1 on the Billboard charts after selling over 600,000
copies in its first week of release. on the other hand, Dido's album
has been out for nearly two years and is only triple-platinum, with a
significant portion of those sales coming within the past few months.)
(most artists don't "go platinum" [sell a million copies], but Mariah
does so routinely. each of her first eight [!] albums sold over 3
million copies.)
|
ashke
|
|
response 202 of 206:
|
May 5 01:17 UTC 2001 |
Well, unless you're a boy band...don't forget them.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 203 of 206:
|
May 5 04:26 UTC 2001 |
That's about what I thought. I'm reminded of a scene from _The Glenn Miller
Story_. His prospective father-in-law is disparaging his profession and
asks how much he makes per record. Miller answers, "Two or three cents."
"And how many did you sell last year?" "Five hundred thousand," and starts
to walk off. Father-in-law starts counting on his fingers, and starts, "But
that's . . ." Miller looks back and says, "Yes, it is" and leaves. In
the Thirties, $10,000 was a fair amount of money. Today, it's not so good.
|
ashke
|
|
response 204 of 206:
|
May 5 06:05 UTC 2001 |
not when you have to pay lawyers, studio time, other things related to the
album and THEN you pay for your house, expenses...
|
dbratman
|
|
response 205 of 206:
|
May 9 21:39 UTC 2001 |
But don't the artists get a bit more than 2 or 3 cents per copy now?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 206 of 206:
|
May 10 03:33 UTC 2001 |
That depends entirely on what kind of deal they signed..
|