|
Grex > Agora46 > #121: California's Governor Gray Davis facing recall election | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 264 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 193 of 264:
|
Sep 2 16:35 UTC 2003 |
It is much more complicated than that. Even the agricultural lobby makes
the main claims for ethanol that it reduces dependence on foreign oil
imports, creates jobs, helps farmers by creating a more stable market and
- yes - reduces some vehicle emissions. There are details at
http://platts.com/features/altfuelvehicle/ethanol.shtml.
|
russ
|
|
response 194 of 264:
|
Sep 3 01:56 UTC 2003 |
Re #192: I understand that the replacement of the vehicle fleet and
improvements in refining have eliminated the need for oxygenated fuels
to cut cold-start emissions; I have even seen claims that they are
actually counterproductive with the current vehicle mix, and only going
to become more so.
If so, there is no air-quality argument for either MTBE or ethanol in fuel.
It is purely a sop to the farm lobby.
.
|
gull
|
|
response 195 of 264:
|
Sep 3 12:38 UTC 2003 |
I hadn't heard that. I'd be interested in seeing an article about it,
though.
|
drew
|
|
response 196 of 264:
|
Sep 3 18:37 UTC 2003 |
Is ethanol cheaper per gallon of actual volume than gasoline? (I know it's
more expensive per gallon-equivalent.)
|
gull
|
|
response 197 of 264:
|
Sep 3 18:42 UTC 2003 |
It varies from state to state, depending on how heavily it's subsidized.
|
russ
|
|
response 198 of 264:
|
Sep 4 12:18 UTC 2003 |
Figures I recall for the actual cost of ethanol is about $2/gallon.
Ethanol has about 75% of the energy of gasoline, per unit volume.
.
|
pvn
|
|
response 199 of 264:
|
Sep 6 07:39 UTC 2003 |
Compared to the actual cost of gasoline? (Think taxes)
|
russ
|
|
response 200 of 264:
|
Sep 6 17:16 UTC 2003 |
Re #199: Ethanol is subsidized to the tune of about $2/gallon,
because a 10% ethanol mix is exempt from the Federal motor-fuel
tax (currently about 20 cents a gallon, if memory serves).
If ethanol actually had to pay its own way as a fuel additive,
nobody would want to buy it.
|
drew
|
|
response 201 of 264:
|
Sep 6 20:48 UTC 2003 |
I don't want to buy it as it is - not without a substantial discount which
overwhelms the BTU loss at least, which I never see.
|
gull
|
|
response 202 of 264:
|
Sep 6 23:58 UTC 2003 |
I'd rather have it than MTBE, that's for sure.
|
richard
|
|
response 203 of 264:
|
Sep 7 08:42 UTC 2003 |
From cnn.com, presidential candidate Howard Dean campaigns with Gray
Davis in California:
"LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- Presidential candidate Howard Dean
Saturday urged Californians to vote against the effort to oust Gov.
Gray Davis, calling it part of a plan by right-wing Republicans to
subvert democracy.
"I think this is the fourth attempt to undermine democracy in this
country by the right wing of the Republican Party since the 2000
elections," said Dean.
Other examples, he said, were the refusal by the "conservative-
dominated United States Supreme Court" to order a recount of the votes
in Florida during the 2000 presidential election and separate GOP-led
redistricting efforts in Colorado and Texas that could result in a loss
of seats currently held by Democrats.
"I believe the right wing of the Republican Party is deliberately
undermining the democratic underpinnings of this country," Dean told a
news conference.
"I believe they do not care what Americans think and they do not accept
the legitimacy of our elections and have now, for the fourth time in
the fourth state, attempted to do what they can to remove democracy
from America."
Davis expressed optimism that the voters would allow him to serve out
his term.
"This recall is nothing more than an attempt by Republicans financed by
the right wing to steal an election they could not win. They lost fair
and square and, I believe, at the end of the day, voters will do the
right thing."
Although Davis expressed gratitude for Dean's support, he did not
reciprocate when asked whether he would support Dean's bid for the
Democratic nomination for president.
"I'm taking one election at a time," he said.
Only after the October 7 recall vote will he decide whom to support for
the Democratic presidential nomination, Davis said. But, he added about
the former Vermont governor, "he has precisely the right experience to
be president."
The recall effort picked up steam when, shortly after he was elected to
a second term as governor last year, Californians were told they faced
a $38 billion deficit.
Dean said it would be unfair to hold Davis wholly responsible for the
state's budget deficit, which has since been pared to $8 billion.
"The deficit that was incurred last year is directly traceable to the
president of the United States' extraordinary financial policy in which
he managed to turn the largest surplus in the history of America into
the largest deficit in the history of America in only two-and-a-half
years," he said.
Davis said that since George W. Bush became president, the country has
lost 3.3 million jobs, equivalent to 3,500 jobs per day. (Full story)
Asked whether his presidential bid might be adversely affected by his
support for Davis, Dean responded, "I don't care. My trademark is I say
what I think, for better or for worse."
He added, "I'm tired of having this country run by the right wing. That
is not where most people are in this country, and I think we ought not
to put up with this anymore."
Asked whether he believed the White House was involved in the effort to
unseat Davis, Dean said, "Absolutely. I think [Bush chief political
adviser] Karl Rove and George Bush have their hand in this."
The White House has said it is not involved in the race.
Although Dean is the first of the nine Democratic presidential
candidates to stump for Davis, all have signed a letter opposing the
recall effort and others will soon follow Dean's lead, Davis predicted"
Now you can start to understand why Dean is gaining such support among
Democratic party activists. Will the other presidential candidates
stand up and be counted? I'm waiting to see Kerry, Gephardt and
Leiberman come out to California and stand next to Davis and call
things the way they are!
|
tod
|
|
response 204 of 264:
|
Sep 7 15:09 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 205 of 264:
|
Sep 7 18:08 UTC 2003 |
Yes. Apparently in California more voting = less democracy..
|
klg
|
|
response 206 of 264:
|
Sep 7 21:17 UTC 2003 |
We owe thanks to Dr. Dean for providing the comic relief.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 207 of 264:
|
Sep 7 21:19 UTC 2003 |
i dunno, ah-null is pretty funny.
|
klg
|
|
response 208 of 264:
|
Sep 7 21:29 UTC 2003 |
Yes. You "dunno."
|
happyboy
|
|
response 209 of 264:
|
Sep 8 08:05 UTC 2003 |
you're right...he is not funny at all.
|
gull
|
|
response 210 of 264:
|
Sep 8 15:00 UTC 2003 |
He's funny in the sense that it says a lot about California that he's
considered a serious candidate at all. He's not really funny in the
"ha-ha" sense of the word.
|
tod
|
|
response 211 of 264:
|
Sep 8 16:44 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 212 of 264:
|
Sep 8 16:46 UTC 2003 |
OH HELL YES!
|
albaugh
|
|
response 213 of 264:
|
Sep 8 17:20 UTC 2003 |
"A vast right-wing conspiracy."
|
gull
|
|
response 214 of 264:
|
Sep 8 18:45 UTC 2003 |
Actually, it's only half-vast.
|
slynne
|
|
response 215 of 264:
|
Sep 9 16:25 UTC 2003 |
I am surprised no one has made a film short called "Total Gubernatorial
Recall" starring Arnold Schwartzenegger.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 216 of 264:
|
Sep 9 17:02 UTC 2003 |
Good one! :-)
|
scg
|
|
response 217 of 264:
|
Sep 10 23:23 UTC 2003 |
Such a film couldn't be shown on TV at the moment due to equal time
provisions, but there have certainly been lots of "total recall" jokes here.
|