|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 610 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 191 of 610:
| 
May 12 22:40 UTC 1998 |
The person who guessed it doesn't want to go?
|
i
|
|
response 192 of 610:
|
May 13 18:15 UTC 1998 |
You're drafted, remmers! :)
|
keesan
|
|
response 193 of 610:
|
May 13 18:40 UTC 1998 |
I second the motion! It is much more fun to guess than to enter labels.
|
i
|
|
response 194 of 610:
|
May 17 17:25 UTC 1998 |
Looks like our draftee is overdue for his physical. Perhaps the draft
board should refer his file to the dodger patrol.
|
keesan
|
|
response 195 of 610:
|
May 22 23:20 UTC 1998 |
It has been a week, we need a volunteer, quick before I enter a very strange
label from China which nobody will be able to guess. (Total fat 62 mg,
calories from fat 0 - the new miracle food?)
|
valerie
|
|
response 196 of 610:
|
May 23 02:11 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 197 of 610:
|
May 23 12:01 UTC 1998 |
Hm, I guess I was drafted at some point. Sorry, draft notices
aren't binding unless sent by registered mail (the old-fashioned
kind, not email). Well, *maybe* I'll enter something this
morning, maybe not. If keesan beats me to it, so be it. I
shan't complain.
(I'm the only person in the known universe who still says "shan't".)
|
lilmo
|
|
response 198 of 610:
|
May 23 20:53 UTC 1998 |
Not true!! I do, too. Also, re: 62 mg fat, 0 fat calories, fat has 9
calories to the gram, so 62mg would be better expressed as 0.062g, which would
give slightly over 1/2 calorie.
|
keesan
|
|
response 199 of 610:
|
May 24 00:13 UTC 1998 |
Rounded to the nearest calore that is 1 calorie. Remmers, I can wait. Shan't
is British English, are you British in background?
|
remmers
|
|
response 200 of 610:
|
May 24 01:01 UTC 1998 |
Nope, not at all. Born and raised in Indiana.
Okay, hm... I'll have to go peruse the pantry contents.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 201 of 610:
|
May 25 21:59 UTC 1998 |
(is there a difference in meaning between "shan't" and "won't", or are tehy
interchangeable?)
|
keesan
|
|
response 202 of 610:
|
May 25 23:03 UTC 1998 |
Shall is British, will American. In primary school in Boston they tried to
teach us I shall, you will, he will (or was it you shall?). Shan't and won't
are the negatives for these.
|
i
|
|
response 203 of 610:
|
May 26 22:33 UTC 1998 |
(Hopefully His Snordship will soon emerge from the pantry. There might
be plenty of volunteers for the rescue team, but i wouldn't count on any
of them coming back real soon...)
|
remmers
|
|
response 204 of 610:
|
May 26 23:49 UTC 1998 |
Okay, okay, okay. One Mysterious Nutrition Facts Label coming
right up...
Serving size: 4 Tbsp.
Calories 80
Cal's from fat 0
Sodium 115mg (4%)
Total carb. 18g (6%)
Dietary fiber <1g (3%)
Sugars 15g
Protein 1g
Vitamin A 45%
Vitamin C 45%
Calcium 8%
Iron 15%
Vitamin D 50%
Vitamin B-1 60%
Vitamin B-2 45%
Niacin 45%
Vitamin B-6 45%
Phosphorus 8%
|
keesan
|
|
response 205 of 610:
|
May 27 01:56 UTC 1998 |
Vitamin enriched something, I would bet. Those numbers look awfully close
to each other. Sugar-coated cornflakes with vitamins?
|
remmers
|
|
response 206 of 610:
|
May 27 17:06 UTC 1998 |
Yep, it's a vitamin enriched substance that is often consumed for
breakfast. Not cereal though.
|
keesan
|
|
response 207 of 610:
|
May 27 18:41 UTC 1998 |
Since I have no idea what sorts of sugary substances Americans are currently
consuming for breakfast, I will let others guess the details.
|
birdlady
|
|
response 208 of 610:
|
May 27 21:40 UTC 1998 |
Coffee cake?
|
i
|
|
response 209 of 610:
|
May 27 23:05 UTC 1998 |
It appears to be some sort of powdered / syrup breakfast drink mix.
Dunno what.
|
keesan
|
|
response 210 of 610:
|
May 27 23:47 UTC 1998 |
Wonder if it contains chocolate.
|
remmers
|
|
response 211 of 610:
|
May 28 11:53 UTC 1998 |
Not coffee cake. #209 and #210 are on the right track.
|
birdlady
|
|
response 212 of 610:
|
May 28 20:13 UTC 1998 |
Chocolate Slim Fast?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 213 of 610:
|
May 28 21:03 UTC 1998 |
Chocolate Carnation Instant Breakfast?
(If I'm right, I pass to birdlady)
|
birdlady
|
|
response 214 of 610:
|
May 29 04:42 UTC 1998 |
Actually, if you're right, you can take it. I've posted enough in here
already. =)
|
birdlady
|
|
response 215 of 610:
|
May 29 04:43 UTC 1998 |
Okay...that should have read, "If *I'm* right, you can take it". =)
|
