|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 293 responses total. |
scott
|
|
response 190 of 293:
| 
Feb 10 22:26 UTC 2002 |
The things themselves, so the perps try to bring over their own versions in
hope of getting around the "crippled" Grex versions. Except that the Grex
versions are not actually crippled, it's the network side that's blocked.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 191 of 293:
|
Feb 11 00:18 UTC 2002 |
OK. I knew that there were some things not allowed, and properly blocked ;)
but your comments opened the possibility that large compiles, themselves, were
unwelcome. (I've never written a really large program, so I don't really know
what troubles they would cause other users.)
|
jhudson
|
|
response 192 of 293:
|
Feb 11 19:38 UTC 2002 |
The larger a single file, the larger the symbol table must be
to compile it. Breaking the project into many files that are
careful about using static whenever possible would greatly
reduce the compilation load.
|
ea
|
|
response 193 of 293:
|
Feb 11 21:03 UTC 2002 |
Earlier today I was having trouble logging in with backtalk. Telnet
worked fine ... It seems to be fixed now.
|
russ
|
|
response 194 of 293:
|
Feb 15 22:59 UTC 2002 |
Dialing in tonight I got queue-droppings before I could log in.
Only one level deep, but that's just *wrong*.
|
keesan
|
|
response 195 of 293:
|
Feb 20 17:43 UTC 2002 |
Has anyone else been getting incessant chat requests from smart007
and if so can this account be cancelled? (I will put this login
on my don't acceptlist now).
|
glenda
|
|
response 196 of 293:
|
Feb 20 20:11 UTC 2002 |
Accounts are not cancelled on Grex. It does no good with an open system.
Another account can just be taken out and we are running out of usable UIDs.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 197 of 293:
|
Feb 20 21:00 UTC 2002 |
I can't imagine Grex cancelling an account because of annoying behavior!
None of us would be left except the last-standing staff member.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 198 of 293:
|
Feb 20 22:29 UTC 2002 |
I don't see that there should even be a problem with smart007, since
you can block anyone from chat requests.
|
keesan
|
|
response 199 of 293:
|
Feb 20 23:35 UTC 2002 |
I did that, but first I had to waste time dealing with a chat request every
3 second for about 20 minutes while in themiddle of another chat.
|
jp2
|
|
response 200 of 293:
|
Feb 21 01:17 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 201 of 293:
|
Feb 21 05:30 UTC 2002 |
It takes less than half a minute to add someone to your .nowrite file,
and even less if you write a simple shell script to do it.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 202 of 293:
|
Feb 21 05:53 UTC 2002 |
You would not have had to waste 20 minutes if you had excused yourself
from that chat and taken care of the problem.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 203 of 293:
|
Feb 21 06:48 UTC 2002 |
She would not have to have done anything if an obnoxious user hadn't
accosted her. keesan is not the villain here..
|
oval
|
|
response 204 of 293:
|
Feb 21 06:51 UTC 2002 |
but she _is_ the whiner here.
|
other
|
|
response 205 of 293:
|
Feb 21 07:18 UTC 2002 |
To put this in absolutist perspective, the effort keesan put into
complaining about this abuser is far beyond what would have been required
for her to eliminate the problem he represented to her.
|
glenda
|
|
response 206 of 293:
|
Feb 21 12:43 UTC 2002 |
Sindi, did you tell the person that you did not want to chat right now? If
you did and s/he persisted than complaining is appropriate. If you did not,
how is the person supposed to know? Granted the requests should have stopped
after 2-4, but maybe the person is clueless to how it all works.
|
jp2
|
|
response 207 of 293:
|
Feb 21 15:41 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 208 of 293:
|
Feb 21 15:49 UTC 2002 |
#205> Yes, but it wouldn't have gotten her nearly the attention.
#204> Hear, hear.
|
keesan
|
|
response 209 of 293:
|
Feb 21 16:43 UTC 2002 |
Is there some way to send a telegram while I am chatting with someone else?
The people I chat with often have trouble understanding English and this
particular one would have been offended if I tried to hang up to do so, or
change my plan, so I just kept hitting Ctl-L every time the chat request
scrambled the screen (every few seconds). (It took about 20 minutes to say
goodbye after that, he wanted to chat for just another 30 min, but I finally
promised to be online Friday at noon - it is hard to find someone to chat with
you in your own language.) After changing my write permissions, I sent a
short and polite letter to smart007 explaining what had happened and
suggesting that they request a chat only once, and first do a who to find out
what the other person is doing at the moment. Did not hear back.
|
oval
|
|
response 210 of 293:
|
Feb 21 16:53 UTC 2002 |
suspend the process.
|
slynne
|
|
response 211 of 293:
|
Feb 21 17:56 UTC 2002 |
Cant you shell out of write with a !?
|
tpryan
|
|
response 212 of 293:
|
Feb 21 18:11 UTC 2002 |
I keep chats and writes off until I am done with other
things and are ready to recieve them.
|
keesan
|
|
response 213 of 293:
|
Feb 21 20:13 UTC 2002 |
I have had a few chatters get offended when they tried to reach me and I was
in Pine (cannot get chat requests while in Pine). One clever guy sent me an
email that he was online.
Can you shell out of chat?
|
mdw
|
|
response 214 of 293:
|
Feb 21 21:35 UTC 2002 |
^Z works with talk. use "fg" to get back to it.
!man tcsh
for more info on fg, ^Z, and all that.
chat/write support ! escapes, and I think it's possible to suspend them too.
|
