You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-19   19-42         
 
Author Message
24 new of 42 responses total.
polytarp
response 19 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 21:44 UTC 2003

WE SHOULD IMPEACH HIM / WE DID IT TO VOID!
iggy
response 20 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 22:09 UTC 2003

how are things going re getting ,mnet up?
tod
response 21 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 22:26 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tonster
response 22 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 22:44 UTC 2003

resp:18,resp:19,resp:20,resp:21 : I've talked to Rex, and he's
aware of the issue.  WWNet does not wish to call Level3 or XO (their 2
providers, who are currently null routing us) until EOB today, because if the
attack is still ongoing, they do not wish to have their customers impacted.  We
understand this.  Dave will contact both Level3 and XO this evening and have
those null routes removed and plug m-net back into the wwnet network.  Here is
the information I received from james this afternoon regarding the exact
circumstances of the incident:

03/27/2003 @ 13:14:40 james: well last night there was a huge DoS attack
on them... so they are unplugged here, as well as being null routed at
level3 and xo
03/27/2003 @ 13:14:54 james: dave said it was enough to take down all of
xo michigan
03/27/2003 @ 13:18:35 james: it looked like it was a botnet that was
spoofing packets.... some of the IPs were real, but most of them were
not valid IPs
03/27/2003 @ 13:21:30 james: i dont know if the attack is still going
on, but we need to contact level3 to have them remove the filters when
its stopped
03/27/2003 @ 13:23:37 james: oh yeah, we only have 20Mbits from them and
it was full... but the amount of bandwidth wasnt the major problem it
was the packets per second that hurt 
03/27/2003 @ 16:02:54 james: dave said he wasn't going to try to get it
removed from level3 until after business hours... if it was still going
on and it gets removed it would fuck everything up
aryeh
response 23 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 23:04 UTC 2003

sounds like a bunch of your liberal friends decided that shutting
down m-net as a civil disobedance act to protest the war.
polytarp
response 24 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 23:09 UTC 2003

More like aryeh threw a fit.
aryeh
response 25 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 23:17 UTC 2003

your a fine one to be talking ;-)
aryeh
response 26 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 08:02 UTC 2003

so whats the story now?
cyklone
response 27 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 11:15 UTC 2003

We've notifed Homeland Security.
happyboy
response 28 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 14:26 UTC 2003

Homerland Insecurity
naftee
response 29 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 14:37 UTC 2003

DID ARYEH DO IT OR POLYTARP? WHICH ONE TONSTER?
jp2
response 30 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 14:50 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

twinkie
response 31 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 15:35 UTC 2003

Because polytarp pissed off the intarweb.

edina
response 32 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 16:21 UTC 2003

Tony, thanks for doing so much on this.
iggy
response 33 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 17:13 UTC 2003

yeah, thanks.
polytarp
response 34 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 19:09 UTC 2003

I didn't do anything.

THANK U DONEY!
jep
response 35 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 19:54 UTC 2003

M-Net is back up now.
naftee
response 36 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 20:59 UTC 2003

DANKS DONY AND JEP
iggy
response 37 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 21:28 UTC 2003

really? coool
jep
response 38 of 42: Mark Unseen   Mar 29 02:53 UTC 2003

You're welcome.  I'm glad you appreciate my efforts in the matter for 
I certainly strove mightily to combat the awful forces which separated 
us all from M-Net.
krokus
response 39 of 42: Mark Unseen   Apr 30 14:33 UTC 2003

M-box is unreachable.  Trace ends at a Cisco within wwnet.  Is it
another DoS attack?
iggy
response 40 of 42: Mark Unseen   Apr 30 15:33 UTC 2003

all i know, was that it was ugly and it *pooped*

and i cant get on mnet.
jor
response 41 of 42: Mark Unseen   Apr 30 16:59 UTC 2003

        and down.arbornet.org is also
iggy
response 42 of 42: Mark Unseen   Apr 30 19:11 UTC 2003

i can get on THAT..
 0-19   19-42         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss