You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   163-187   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-312   313-323      
 
Author Message
25 new of 323 responses total.
edina
response 188 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 2 18:10 UTC 2004

Peter's professor that threatens to fail him becomes (I'm forgetting the name)
some sort of lizard man.  Jonah Jameson's son goes to space (he's an
astronaut, remember?) and comes back as something else.
tod
response 189 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 2 18:22 UTC 2004

Peter's Aunt goes to prison for tax evasion and comes back as Martha Stewart.
albaugh
response 190 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 4 17:19 UTC 2004

Re: #188 - those references must come from the comix.  Besides *introducing*
those characters, I didn't see any foreshadowing of evil (except perhaps the
a-naut's jilting at the altar being a motivation for revenge...).
mcnally
response 191 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 4 19:14 UTC 2004

  re #190:  that's correct, the inclusion of other characters from the 
  Spiderman universe is probably mostly a nod to fans of the comic book
  who are familiar with its history.

  However, these particular minor characters wind up becoming supervillains
  in the classic Spiderman pattern:  they violate the natural order and mess
  with Something Which Man Was Not Meant to Know (John Jameson flies through
  space and visits the moon; Connors experiments with limb regeneration iirc)
  and both wind up transformed into id-dominated monsters (Jameson a
  werewolf-like creature, Connors a lizard-man.)
richard
response 192 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 01:09 UTC 2004

Speaking of comic book movies, the next Batman movie is currently filming in
England, with Christian Bale (the british actor who starred in American
Psycho) as Batman, and the villains are Liam Neeson as the Scarecrow and Ken
Watanabe as the evil Ras Al Ghul, with Gary Oldman as Commissioner Gordon
and Michael Caine as Alfred.  Sounds promising.
edina
response 193 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 13:24 UTC 2004

I know!!  Christian Bale has been mentioned for possibly taking over James
Bond.  I have to admit, of everyone out there, he is my fave.
mooncat
response 194 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 19:30 UTC 2004

Christian Bale is wonderful, and I think he'll play a great Batman. 
jvmv
response 195 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 08:48 UTC 2004


     I'm discouraged with the future works of 
     James Bond series. One of the best films 
     of adventures & action is surely James 
     Bond. However, when it was produced by 
     English, because it lost the same quality 
     after it began to be produced by North 
     American. 
     
     Hereafter, I hope the production comes back 
     to the English hands. The North Americans are 
     transforming James Bond in a kind of mediocre 
     mercenary as other created by the hoolywoodian 
     studios.

     ...


tod
response 196 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 13:59 UTC 2004

Its all about Cubby Brocolli
twenex
response 197 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 22:43 UTC 2004

It's about time they laid the ghost of Batman movies to rest, imnsho.
Then again, I said that when they cast Michael Keaton in the first one.
Ouch....

I, Robot: OK, so maybe it's nothing like the book; damned if I know as I
haven't read it. Bloody good movie. Effects are getting better all the
time - but don't worry, this movie actually has a /plot/, too. Wow. Will
Smith sure picks some winners. Gets good lines, too.
mary
response 198 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 23:09 UTC 2004

Am I the only one who while watching "Spiderman" is wondering about 
the poor slob who is going to get the job of cleaning up all those 
sticky spider web thingies Spidy's ejecting all over town?

Body secretions.  Sticky body secretions.  Yuck.

tod
response 199 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 23:20 UTC 2004

It's NYC. Plenty of it already..
remmers
response 200 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 22:30 UTC 2004

I think they dry in a few hours, turn into dust, and blow away.
Problem solved.
mary
response 201 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 23:19 UTC 2004

If true, then spiders would need to find another way to catch
prey and survive.  And Karen wouldn't have to dust all those high
corners.

Nope, I'm not buying the "not a problem" thing.  It's a problem.
Be denialistic all you want.  It's the dirty side of herohood and
nobody wants to talk about it.
gelinas
response 202 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 02:41 UTC 2004

Real spiders eat their webs.  Peter had to devise his own, as well as
the device to launch it (ignored or glossed over in the movie), so I've
always assumed his web-formula was bio-degradable:  He needed the webs to
last for an hour or so at most, to hold the bad guys until the cops arrived.
richard
response 203 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 05:34 UTC 2004

MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE-- this wasn't as good as the original, but is a fine
movie in its own way.  Directed by Jonathan Demme (Silence of the Lambs),
and starring Meryl Streep and Denzel Washington (in the Angela Lansbury
and Frank Sinatra roles)  I liked the way this was updated, now instead of
the communists being the big evil, it is corporate power/greed.  Same
story, different enemy.  Both Streep and Washington deliver oscar caliber
performances, and Liev Schrieber (in the other principal role, played by
Laurence Harvey in the original) is also quite good.  This movie is quite
appropriate for an election year.  It raises the serious question of "to
what extent are we all brainwashed/controlled by the power of big multi
national corporations?
anderyn
response 204 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 05:52 UTC 2004

Watched "Hildago" today. I had been wanting to see it ever since I first saw
the previews, but hadn't managed to make it to the theater. But it was quite
good on the small screen. Viggo Mortensen managed to make his character, Frank
T. Hopkins, sympathetic and charismatic, although Hildago, the horse, did
steal the show. :-) It wasn't very original, plot-wise, being a take on the
old-time serials, but it was quite fun. I liked it a lot.
tod
response 205 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 15:09 UTC 2004

Watched Starsky & Hutch with Stiller and Wilson. It was very fun.
edina
response 206 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 18:49 UTC 2004

"Don't give up on us baby . . ."

Between that and "Do It", I still howl.
tod
response 207 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 19:25 UTC 2004

This is gonna get kinda weird...but I wanna see TWO dragons
mcnally
response 208 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 01:51 UTC 2004

 re #199-201:  In the comic books, the webs were shot from a mechanical
 device that Peter invented, not something that came from his body. 
 As originally written, those webs did indeed dissolve after a fairly
 short time.  But since Raimi and the scriptwriters messed with the web
 issue for the films perhaps Mary has a point.
edina
response 209 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 12:54 UTC 2004

RE 207  LMAO!!!!  
gregb
response 210 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 17:14 UTC 2004

For continuity's sake, I stick with the comics.  As for what the movie
did, well, that's just their goof.
albaugh
response 211 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 21:22 UTC 2004

First, I remember seeing (maybe it was on "The Ghoul") this really horribly
badly made "Dracula versus Frankenstein" movie with Lon Chaney as a pitiful
shell of himself.

Then last summer we had "Freddy versus Jason".

Now soon to be released is AVP.  Who is lined up already to see this one? :-)
tod
response 212 of 323: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 21:25 UTC 2004

What's AVP?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   163-187   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-312   313-323      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss