You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   157-181   182-206 
 207-231   232-256   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-335     
 
Author Message
25 new of 335 responses total.
russ
response 182 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 16 13:48 UTC 2003

RISKS digest volume 22 issue 85 is in /a/r/u/russ/risks/risks-22.85
russ
response 183 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 15:14 UTC 2003

As you might expect, the latest RISKS digest has a bunch of
(very early) commentary on the power outage, but also a lot
on the latest MS worm, confounding factors in medical research
(with lessons for everything else), deceptive URLs used by
scammers, filtered e-mail and more.  /a/r/u/russ/risks/risks-22.85
lk
response 184 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 18:11 UTC 2003

I need a Televideo 990 or 9060 terminal (or two). If you have one sitting
around (or can swap for a Wyse) please let me know.  More details in
Classified item 1137.  Email LK@stratcom.com .
russ
response 185 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 22:17 UTC 2003

In the wake of 8/14, the RISKS digests are flying fast.  RISKS digest
volume 22 issue 86 is in /a/r/u/russ/risks/risks-22.86.
gregb
response 186 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 15:04 UTC 2003

Do we have to boil it first? B-)
dcat
response 187 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 17:03 UTC 2003

Today is my last day in Ann Arbor.
gregb
response 188 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 19:26 UTC 2003

Where U off to, Dcat?
dcat
response 189 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 19 04:56 UTC 2003

U of Pittsburgh, w/ orinoco
albaugh
response 190 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 21 16:56 UTC 2003

IWLTA that I saw in Ohio (must have been near Toledo) a billboard saying
"Raise the drinking age to 25."  I think it was in reference to drunk driving.
They gave a web address for more info, which I forget.  Even if it were to
become law, there are so many practical problems, and who knows if would have
any actual effect on whatever the problem is it's trying to solve.
gull
response 191 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 21 17:22 UTC 2003

My experience has been that the 21 drinking age mostly encourages guys
in the 16-20 age group to drive into corn fields and drink out of the
backs of pickup trucks, then try to drive home.
gregb
response 192 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 21 17:24 UTC 2003

"Practical problems?"  Only for those anxious to suck down some beers 
and whatnot.
goose
response 193 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 21 18:30 UTC 2003

Lower the drinking age to 16, raise the driving age to 21.  I'm actually
serious...I would support that.  I also think on your second DUI, DWI, OUIL,
whatever...you should be charged with attempted murder.
russ
response 194 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 01:29 UTC 2003

RISKS digest volume 22 issue 87 is in /a/r/u/rus/risks/risks-22.87
jep
response 195 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 02:25 UTC 2003

I think Newsweek reported this week that 3.7% of adults will have been 
convicted of felony by 2030 or thereabouts.  I've shifted left on 
another issue and cannot support the addition of more felonies for 
alcohol convictions.  Let's not make felonies the norm.
jep
response 196 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 02:26 UTC 2003

I would support decriminalizing the kicking to pulp of those convicted 
of DUI *misdemeanors*, though.
jmsaul
response 197 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 03:24 UTC 2003

Re #192:  Wrong.  It affects everyone, because it forces younger people who
          are going to drink to do it in private homes (which, unlike bars
          and restaurants, aren't staffed by people trained to shut drunk
          people down and try to take their keys, and don't charge as much
          per drink), cars, parks, and other places like that.  It also
          teaches people early to form binge drinking patterns rather than
          healthy social drinking ones.  Both of those are problems for
          society as a whole, not just for the drinkers.
jaklumen
response 198 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 05:58 UTC 2003

I would ask some questions, perhaps partially rhetorical: how has 
society changed over history?  And how does it vary over the world?  
In colonial America, a 15 year old was expected to drink with the men 
and hold his liquor.  But in the modern U.S., high school and college 
students have binge drinking problems.  We have strigent standards on 
alcohol content, and yet in countries abroad, the booze is stronger 
and the drinking ages are lower.  Are foreign cultures more 
circumspect about propriety in drinking and perhaps have less 
tolerance for public drunkenness?  

And what of the fact that in many of these countries, the legal 
driving age is 18?  Any correlation there?

Something to think on, perhaps discuss.  I've heard a few words on it, 
but not enough that I think I would fully understand it all.
slynne
response 199 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 11:33 UTC 2003

The biggest problem is that in this country, we are dependent on our 
cars. Raising the driving age would be very unpopular because it is 
really hard for folks to get around sometimes without a car. But, 16 
year olds are generally not responsible enough to handle both the 
responsibilities of driving and drinking. They are likely to drink 
alcohol and then get behind the wheel of a car. Personally, I still 
think the better solution is to lower the drinking age and to raise the 
driving age. People are less likely to hurt others while they learn to 
drink responsibly than they are to hurt others whole learning to drive 
responsibly. 
gull
response 200 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 12:59 UTC 2003

Re #199: I think a lot of the problem is simply that age and maturity
are only loosely correlated.  Unfortunately there's no good,
legally-respected way to measure maturity.
jep
response 201 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 13:11 UTC 2003

I think 16 year olds need to drive more than they need to drink.  Take 
away their cars, and in a lot of cases, you take away their jobs.
gelinas
response 202 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 13:24 UTC 2003

Let's continue the 'drinking and driving' discussion in item 171, set up for
that purpose.
jep
response 203 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 13:33 UTC 2003

Good idea.
tod
response 204 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 15:49 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tod
response 205 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 18:55 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jmsaul
response 206 of 335: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 22:11 UTC 2003

Seems reasonable to me.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   157-181   182-206 
 207-231   232-256   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-335     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss