| Grex > Agora47 > #30: Howard Dean for President |  |
| response 181 of 536: | 
Oct 9 02:07 UTC 2003 |
I nominate janc.
| response 182 of 536: |
Oct 9 07:27 UTC 2003 |
re #178: only if there's some sort of "blue ribbon panel" involved..
| response 183 of 536: |
Oct 11 03:43 UTC 2003 |
back to the topic at hand .. congress abrogated (as can be read in several screeching texts) its twin responsiblilties of *monetary* and *fiscal* policy back in 1913. both were too much for any political body to consider simultaneoulsy. sicne, it seems, they fscked up monitary policy in mroe gross terms tha fiscal policy, they opted for removing monitary policy to professionals. one can only hope thay would sluff of fiscal policy as well given their abject failures since 1913. house of representatives doesn;t understand *numbers* let alone arithmetic. (forget mathematics - dont' even go there.) remember, please, *ALL* fiscal operations MUST be drawn in HR.
| response 184 of 536: |
Oct 11 22:23 UTC 2003 |
Not entirely correct: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. (Art. I, Sec. 7)
| response 185 of 536: |
Oct 12 08:45 UTC 2003 |
'originate' si the key. what teh senate does or doesn't do seems to matter little.
| response 186 of 536: |
Oct 14 15:48 UTC 2003 |
sheesh..talk about OFF topic. let me steer this thread back on course. DEAN IS A LIBERAL PUPPET AND HE SUCKS. That loser will make Mondale look like a liberal victory *snicker* You could give Dean a head start by awarding him NY and Ca. That is all he would win.... Why don't you liberals back someone that has a snowflakes chance of winning? The only votes he will get are from the fags and feminazies...perhaps a few lotus eating hollywooders will vote for him also.
| response 187 of 536: |
Oct 14 16:52 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 188 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:04 UTC 2003 |
Re 186. I think you have some surprises coming.
| response 189 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:21 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 190 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:26 UTC 2003 |
Isn't Dean polling ahead of George W. Bush?
| response 191 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:28 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 192 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:44 UTC 2003 |
What is the theory behind that?
| response 193 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:54 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 194 of 536: |
Oct 14 17:56 UTC 2003 |
Pee Wee's Big Adventure Syndrome.
| response 195 of 536: |
Oct 14 19:55 UTC 2003 |
re#187 - I must have missed that request.
| response 196 of 536: |
Oct 14 20:05 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 197 of 536: |
Oct 14 20:21 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 198 of 536: |
Oct 14 20:35 UTC 2003 |
Are you talking about authoritive proof that the fed is part of the government? All I have is the stuff from the NY Fed's website that I posted earlier.
| response 199 of 536: |
Oct 14 20:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 200 of 536: |
Oct 14 21:13 UTC 2003 |
Bush is right where most presidents are at this point in their presidency. Whatever the democrats are doing is of little consequence at this point.
| response 201 of 536: |
Oct 14 21:27 UTC 2003 |
So you are saying that the Fed's own website is wrong? Fair enough. That is all I have. That and a blurb from a Macroeconomics text book and what my Macroeconimics professor told me and from what my father told me. Frankly, for me, what two Phd's in Economics, one person with a master's degree and the New York Fed's own web site are enough for me especially when compared against YOUR word.
| response 202 of 536: |
Oct 14 23:06 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 203 of 536: |
Oct 14 23:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 204 of 536: |
Oct 14 23:14 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 205 of 536: |
Oct 14 23:24 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.